Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 025540.KS Korea Electric Terminal Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Korea Electric Terminal Co., Ltd.025540.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Information Technology›Electronic Components
Momentum neutral 43
Mkt cap
$369M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
55%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$755,476
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
5.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+3.2 pp
WACC 5.6%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
6 days
12 Nov 2026
Close · KRW₩50,000
1D-1.6%
1W-0.4%
1M-9.1%
3M-19.1%
6M-45.3%
YTD-25.7%
1Y-18.6%
ATR %3.5%
52w lowhigh46.8% off high

What Korea Electric Terminal does

Employees: 1,134

Korea Electric Terminal at a glance

Size Korea Electric Terminal (025540.KS) is a South Korea Information Technology company (Electronic Components) with a market value of $369M, the 420th largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩50,000 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 45.3%, against -18.3% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 4.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.8%); the operating margin is 8.2% (peer median 6.0%).

Valuation It trades at 5.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 12.2× (cheapest of 10).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.2 points above its cost of capital (5.6% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 12 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 80025540.KS 56
Six months, rebased to 100: Korea Electric Terminal against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Korea Electric Terminal financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩1.44T₩1.44T₩1.51T₩1.30T₩1.17T
Revenue growth—-4%+16%+11%—
Gross profit₩274B₩298B₩332B₩247B₩186B
EBITDA₩198B₩217B₩244B₩178B₩128B
Net income₩122B₩106B₩142B₩72.9B₩48.7B
Free cash flow₩162B₩157B₩98.4B₩32.3B-₩74.5B
Capital expenditure₩63.2B₩63.0B₩99.0B₩103B₩126B
Total debt₩82.7B₩98.2B₩147B₩165B₩84.0B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Korea Electric Terminal competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%+50%-40%-20%0%130030132930554927620969084771MEIPACT24786036331263403088676800067030003264498155688391TTG025540.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Korea Electric Terminal is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%+30%5×10×15×20×69084771PACT6036333088676864498155TTG025540.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Korea Electric Terminal is the large dot.

Korea Electric Terminal competitors and peer comparison

How Korea Electric Terminal compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Korea Electric Terminal against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure025540.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-9.1%-21.8%7th highest of 21
6-month return-45.3%-18.3%4th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-46.8%-47.5%10th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-4.4%+8.8%3rd lowest of 21
Operating margin8.2%6.0%9th highest of 21
Forward P/E5.1×12.2×cheapest of 10
ROIC minus cost of capital+3.2 pp-1.8 pp6th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA1.4×9.0×cheapest of 14
Net debt / EBITDA-1.2×1.2×3rd least indebted of 15

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Korea Electric Terminal 025540.KSSouth Korea$369M-45%-4%8%5.1×n/an/a
Trigiant 1300.HKHong Kong$368M-1%+26%12%n/a-13.0%-2.4%
Singatron Electronic (China) 301329.SZChina$372M-35%+37%5%n/an/an/a
Spirox 3055.TWTaiwan$377M+47%+4%-55%n/an/an/a
Apex International 4927.TWTaiwan$359M-24%-10%-22%n/an/an/a
Kinko Optical 6209.TWTaiwan$359M-5%+67%11%n/an/an/a
IRISO Electronics 6908.TJapan$359M-28%+10%9%19.5×-7.6%+11.1%
Vizionfocus 4771.TWTaiwan$355M+8%+26%29%10.2×n/an/a
Methode Electronics MEIUnited States$384M+12%+1%1%n/an/an/a
Proact IT PACT.STSweden$354M+8%+4%7%11.7×-5.8%+5.2%
Ta-I Technology 2478.TWTaiwan$388M+16%+8%14%n/a13.2%+0.1%
Shanghai Laimu Electronics 603633.SSChina$394M-26%+2%-12%19.9×n/an/a
Vinatech Co 126340.KSSouth Korea$395M-56%+66%2%n/an/an/a
Axiomtek 3088.TWOTaiwan$340M-14%+35%12%11.8×-3.5%+8.8%
Tamura 6768.TJapan$339M-22%+8%4%9.3×n/an/a
Youngpoong 000670.KSSouth Korea$406M-54%+40%-2%n/a-14.5%-1.8%
Jinlong Machinery & Electronic 300032.SZChina$411M-35%-18%-4%n/a12.4%-2.0%
APAQ Technology 6449.TWTaiwan$414M-13%+23%18%14.7×n/an/a
Allied Circuit 8155.TWOTaiwan$416M-52%+33%14%12.2×n/an/a
Hi-Trend Technology (Shanghai) 688391.SSChina$418M-23%+4%-4%n/a4.9%+7.3%
TT Electronics TTG.LUnited Kingdom$419M+50%-3%7%14.6×9.9%+2.2%

Questions

Which companies are Korea Electric Terminal's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Trigiant (1300.HK), Singatron Electronic (China) (301329.SZ), Spirox (3055.TW), Apex International (4927.TW), Kinko Optical (6209.TW), IRISO Electronics (6908.T), Vizionfocus (4771.TW), Methode Electronics (MEI).
Is Korea Electric Terminal expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 5.1× against a peer median of 12.2×, cheapest of 10 in its peer set.
How has Korea Electric Terminal stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -45.3% against -18.3% for the median peer; over one year -18.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.