Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › SEA.TO Seabridge Gold IncOpen in the cockpit ↗

Seabridge Gold IncSEA.TOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Canada · CAD·Materials›Precious Metals

Advances the large KSM and Iskut gold-copper projects in northwestern British Columbia.

Momentum weak 35
Mkt cap
$2.87B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
98%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$2.75M
20-day average traded
P/B
3.63×
price to book
ROE
3.3%
delivered
Implied ROE
38.3%
what the price asks
Next earnings
10 days
16 Nov 2026
Close · CADC$37.25
1D+4.1%
1W+10.1%
1M-2.0%
3M-14.3%
6M-8.1%
YTD-8.4%
1Y+17.9%
ATR %5.2%
52w lowhigh31.4% off high

What Seabridge Gold does

Advances the large KSM and Iskut gold-copper projects in northwestern British Columbia.

Has no mine revenue; it pays for engineering and permitting by raising money from shareholders, so its value rests on the gold and copper in the ground and the permits behind them. KSM would need a very large construction budget, which is why Seabridge talks of bringing in a partner to build it.

Products and services

  • KSM project
  • Iskut project
  • Courageous Lake project

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Precious metals
  • Gold-copper exploration & development
  • Large-scale undeveloped deposit

What could go right

  • Gold/copper price strength
  • Potential partner/JV to fund construction

What could go wrong

  • Very large capex requirement to build KSM
  • BC/Alaska transboundary permitting risk

Moat: narrow (installed base). Owns one of the world's largest undeveloped gold-copper deposits, though pre-construction.

Headquarters: Toronto, Canada · Founded: 1999 · Employees: 50

Named competitors

Seabridge Gold at a glance

Size Seabridge Gold (SEA.TO) is a Canada Materials company (Precious Metals) with a market value of $2.87B, the 162nd largest of 420 Canada companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at C$37.25 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 8.1%, against -16.8% for the median peer and +5.2% for the Canada market (cap-weighted) — 9th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Valuation It trades at 3.63× book value against a peer median of 3.32× (9th most expensive of 21).

Price implies The share price implies a return on equity of about 38.3%; Seabridge Gold delivers 3.3%, so the price asks more than the business earns today.

Next results Next results expected around 16 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026SEA.TO 87Peer median 81
Six months, rebased to 100: Seabridge Gold against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Seabridge Gold financials

Reported figures in CAD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueC$0C$0C$0C$0C$0
Revenue growth—————
Gross profit-C$181,000-C$232,000-C$386,000-C$385,000-C$156,000
EBITDA-C$28.1M-C$22.0M-C$21.5M-C$17.3M-C$22.7M
Net incomeC$34.8M-C$53.2M-C$31.2M-C$29.3M-C$7.39M
Free cash flow-C$175M-C$152M-C$120M-C$252M-C$206M
Capital expenditureC$156MC$137MC$106MC$230MC$183M
Total debtC$562MC$600MC$564MC$575MC$265M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Seabridge Gold competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-30%-20%-10%0%-10%0%+10%FVIWDONG3330WAFEMRPDIAAUCARIS001337601069PPTA002237HOCRRLEDRWGXAYASKESEA.TO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Seabridge Gold is the large dot.

Fundamentals: return on equity against price-to-book

-40%-20%0%20%40%20×40×60×80×FVIWDONG3330WAFEMRPDIAAUCARIS001337601069PPTA002237HOCRRLEDRWGXAYAPAFSKESEA.TOReturn on equity →Price / book →
A bank or insurer earning more on its equity usually trades at a higher multiple of book; points far above the trend are priced for more. Seabridge Gold is the large dot.

Capital: ROE delivered against the ROE the price implies

0%200%400%0%200%400%FVIWDONGPDI001337PPTASKESEA.TOROE delivered →ROE the price implies →
Above the diagonal = the price asks for a higher return on equity than the business earns today. Seabridge Gold is the large dot.

Seabridge Gold competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (SEA.TO vs NEM vs SLVR.TO vs IVN.TO)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROE
Seabridge Gold SEA.TO$2.87B-8%n/a3%3.63×38.3%
Newmont NEM$126B+4%+23%27%3.53×19.7%
Silver Tiger Metals SLVR.TO$344M-12%n/a-4%1.97×28.7%
Ivanhoe Mines IVN.TO$8.43B-26%+109%3%1.38×15.7%
Novagold Resources NG$2.81B-27%n/a-33%6.72×48.1%
Skeena Resources SKE.TO$3.90B+6%n/a-175%31.93×388.4%
Perpetua Resources PPTA$2.44B-35%n/a-38%3.39×14.4%
NGEx Minerals NGEX.TO$3.37B-15%n/a-45%10.88×116.6%

How Seabridge Gold compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Seabridge Gold against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureSEA.TOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-2.0%-3.5%10th highest of 21
6-month return-8.1%-16.8%9th highest of 21
Return on equity3.3%21.9%6th lowest of 21
Price / book3.63×3.32×9th most expensive of 21
Trailing P/E129.8×11.6×most expensive of 16
ROE the price implies38.3%25.5%7th most demanding of 21
ROE delivered3.3%23.0%6th lowest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROEDelivered ROE
Seabridge Gold SEA.TOCanada$2.87B-8%n/a3%3.63×38.3%3.3%
Fortuna Mining FVI.TOCanada$2.87B-5%+6%23%1.61×21.1%23.0%
Wesdome Gold Mines WDO.TOCanada$2.92B+6%+49%47%4.03×21.9%47.4%
Novagold Resources NGUnited States$2.81B-27%n/a-33%6.72×48.1%-32.8%
Lingbao Gold 3330.HKHong Kong$2.94B-28%-10%30%2.55×16.8%30.4%
West African Resources WAF.AXAustralia$2.74B+4%+194%38%2.01×19.3%37.6%
Emerald Resources NL EMR.AXAustralia$3.04B+6%+40%33%4.79×35.9%33.1%
Predictive Discovery PDI.AXAustralia$3.08B-13%n/a-7%2.71×19.2%-7.4%
Allied Gold AAUC.TOCanada$3.24B-19%+54%-14%5.77×31.4%-14.0%
Aris Mining ARIS.TOCanada$3.24B-15%+94%21%1.81×23.3%20.8%
Sichuan Gold 001337.SZChina$2.52B-25%+57%33%7.70×79.2%33.2%
Western Region Gold 601069.SSChina$3.29B-26%+118%10%4.27×39.7%n/a
Perpetua Resources PPTAUnited States$2.44B-35%n/a-38%3.39×14.4%-37.8%
Shandong Humon Smelting 002237.SZChina$2.44B-32%+25%9%1.16×11.1%8.6%
Hochschild Mining HOC.LUnited Kingdom$3.37B-27%+37%37%3.48×25.6%37.4%
Regis Resources RRL.AXAustralia$3.49B-3%+43%38%2.30×25.4%37.7%
Endeavour Silver EDR.TOCanada$2.34B-20%+198%10%3.24×44.6%10.4%
Westgold Resources WGX.AXAustralia$3.64B-2%+79%20%2.21×17.1%20.4%
Aya Gold & Silver AYA.TOCanada$3.68B+40%+265%25%7.41×68.5%25.4%
Pan African Resources PAF.LUnited Kingdom$3.79B-25%+106%45%3.00×26.4%45.0%
Skeena Resources SKE.TOCanada$3.90B+6%n/a-175%31.93×388.4%-175.2%

Questions

Who are Seabridge Gold's main competitors?
Named competitors: Newmont (NEM), Northern Dynasty Minerals (SLVR.TO), Ivanhoe Mines (IVN.TO), NovaGold Resources (NG), Skeena Resources (SKE.TO), Perpetua Resources (PPTA). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Fortuna Mining (FVI.TO), Wesdome Gold Mines (WDO.TO), Novagold Resources (NG), Lingbao Gold (3330.HK), West African Resources (WAF.AX), Emerald Resources NL (EMR.AX).
Is Seabridge Gold expensive compared with its peers?
On price / book it trades at 3.63× against a peer median of 3.32×, 9th most expensive of 21 in its peer set. The share price implies a return on equity of about 38.3%; Seabridge Gold delivers 3.3%, so the price asks more than the business earns today.
How has Seabridge Gold stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -8.1% against -16.8% for the median peer; over one year +17.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.