Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › RMS.AX Ramelius Resources LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

Ramelius Resources LimitedRMS.AXCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Australia · AUD·Materials›Precious Metals

Australian gold miner operating open-pit and underground mines in Western Australia.

≈ A smaller Western Australia gold producerMomentum neutral 57
Mkt cap
$4.78B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
98%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$19.6M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
19.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-2.0 pp
WACC 10.9%
Hurdle
+3 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
109 days
23 Feb 2027
Close · AUDA$3.67
1D-2.9%
1W+7.3%
1M-1.1%
3M0.0%
6M+2.5%
YTD-11.8%
1Y+4.6%
ATR %4.5%
52w lowhigh28.9% off high

What Ramelius Resources does

Australian gold miner operating open-pit and underground mines in Western Australia.

In one line: A smaller Western Australia gold producer.

Products and services

  • Mt Magnet/Vivien gold operations
  • Edna May/Rebecca-Roe operations

Customers

  • Gold refiners/bullion buyers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Mining
  • Gold mining
  • Western Australia gold production

What could go right

  • Gold price cycles

What could go wrong

  • Gold price volatility
  • Reserve depletion/exploration risk

Moat: narrow (installed base). Established regional processing infrastructure lowers costs for its gold deposits.

Headquarters: Perth, Australia · Founded: 1998 · Employees: 380

Named competitors

Ramelius Resources at a glance

Size Ramelius Resources (RMS.AX) is an Australia Materials company (Precious Metals) with a market value of $4.78B, the 69th largest of 316 Australia companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at A$3.67 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 2.5%, against -0.4% for the median peer and +4.1% for the Australia market (cap-weighted) — 10th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 14.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +50.3%); the operating margin is 42.1% (peer median 44.7%).

Valuation It trades at 19.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 11.8× (3rd most expensive of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 14% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +10%, so the hurdle is +3 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.0 points below its cost of capital (10.9% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 23 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026RMS.AX 105Peer median 100
Six months, rebased to 100: Ramelius Resources against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Ramelius Resources financials

Reported figures in AUD; fiscal year ends 2026-06-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
RevenueA$1.03BA$1.03BA$1.02BA$883MA$631M
Revenue growth—+1%+15%+40%—
Gross profitA$452MA$451MA$610MA$287MA$114M
EBITDAA$764MA$764MA$758MA$460MA$273M
Net incomeA$119MA$119MA$474MA$217MA$61.6M
Free cash flowA$288MA$288MA$637MA$368MA$92.0M
Capital expenditureA$316MA$316MA$160MA$123MA$189M
Total debtn/aA$79.5MA$64.4MA$10.5MA$28.4M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Ramelius Resources competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%-10%0%MAU002155KNTTXR603979GGPCMMCGVAUSSRMGMDPRUSKEPAFAYAOGCWGXSBSWTFPMRRLRMS.AX6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Ramelius Resources is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%10×20×002155KNTTXR603979GGPCMMCGSSRMGMDPRUPAFAYAOGCWGXSBSWTFPMRRLRMS.AXRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Ramelius Resources is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+50%+100%+150%0%100%002155KNTTXR603979VAUGMDAYAWGXRMS.AXGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Ramelius Resources is the large dot.

Ramelius Resources competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (RMS.AX vs GMD.AX vs NST.AX vs EVN.AX)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Ramelius Resources RMS.AX$4.78B+3%-14%42%19.0×13.7%
Genesis Minerals GMD.AX$5.73B+6%+89%45%15.1×7.2%
Northern Star Resources NST.AX$25.3B+19%+19%35%17.8×17.5%
Evolution Mining EVN.AX$18.3B-4%+28%42%13.4×10.8%

How Ramelius Resources compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Ramelius Resources against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureRMS.AXPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-1.1%-0.4%9th lowest of 21
6-month return+2.5%-0.4%10th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-28.9%-22.9%9th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-14.2%+50.3%lowest of 19
Operating margin42.1%44.7%7th lowest of 19
Forward P/E19.0×11.8×3rd most expensive of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)13.7%-1.1%2nd most demanding of 16
Growth delivered (Del g)+10.3%+29.2%lowest of 15
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+3.5 pp-32.7 ppmost demanding of 15
ROIC minus cost of capital-2.0 pp+19.7 pp3rd lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA8.3×5.3×5th most expensive of 17
Net debt / EBITDA-0.7×-0.5×7th least indebted of 17

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Ramelius Resources RMS.AXAustralia$4.78B+3%-14%42%19.0×13.7%+10.3%
Montage Gold MAU.TOCanada$4.79B+17%n/an/a18.4×n/an/a
Hunan Gold 002155.SZChina$4.72B-33%+1%4%15.3×11.1%+27.4%
K92 Mining KNT.TOCanada$4.86B+10%+62%68%11.0×0.7%+31.3%
Torex Resources TXR.TOCanada$5.02B+16%+76%46%7.1×-3.9%+11.5%
JCHX MINING MANAGEMENT 603979.SSChina$5.09B-12%+23%28%9.9×-7.7%+29.3%
Greatland Resources GGP.AXAustralia$5.11B-31%+118%52%13.4×-3.1%n/a
Capricorn Metals CMM.AXAustralia$4.42B-1%+45%58%17.6×12.7%+33.9%
Centerra Gold CG.TOCanada$4.25B+27%+44%27%12.4×6.5%+13.9%
Vault Minerals VAU.AXAustralia$4.19B+21%+35%33%13.0×-0.1%+59.0%
SSR Mining SSRMUnited States$5.66B-17%+39%42%8.1×n/an/a
Genesis Minerals GMD.AXAustralia$5.73B+6%+89%45%15.1×7.2%+182.9%
Perseus Mining PRU.AXAustralia$5.77B+11%+13%48%11.8×-1.1%+26.4%
Skeena Resources SKE.TOCanada$3.90B+6%n/an/an/an/an/a
Pan African Resources PAF.LUnited Kingdom$3.79B-25%+106%54%7.2×-6.7%+25.7%
Aya Gold & Silver AYA.TOCanada$3.68B+40%+265%53%19.2×17.9%+72.4%
OceanaGold OGC.TOCanada$6.27B-5%+56%44%7.1×-5.4%+29.2%
Westgold Resources WGX.AXAustralia$3.64B-2%+79%32%8.8×-7.6%+33.7%
Sibanye Stillwater Limited Sponsored ADR SBSWUnited States$6.30B-29%+59%26%5.9×n/an/a
Triple Flag Precious Metals TFPM.TOCanada$6.54B+1%+45%63%24.7×n/an/a
Regis Resources RRL.AXAustralia$3.49B-3%+43%43%8.5×-9.5%+23.5%

Questions

Who are Ramelius Resources's main competitors?
Named competitors: Genesis Minerals (GMD.AX), Northern Star Resources (NST.AX), Evolution Mining (EVN.AX). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Montage Gold (MAU.TO), Hunan Gold (002155.SZ), K92 Mining (KNT.TO), Torex Resources (TXR.TO), JCHX MINING MANAGEMENT (603979.SS), Greatland Resources (GGP.AX).
Is Ramelius Resources expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 19.0× against a peer median of 11.8×, 3rd most expensive of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 14% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +10%, so the hurdle is +3 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Ramelius Resources stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +2.5% against -0.4% for the median peer; over one year +4.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.