Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › RM.TO Roxmore Resources Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Roxmore Resources Inc.RM.TOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Canada · CAD·Materials›Other Metals/Minerals
Momentum leader 100
Mkt cap
$357M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
87%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$7.51M
20-day average traded
P/B
6.05×
price to book
ROE
-18.8%
delivered
Implied ROE
97.7%
what the price asks
Next earnings
168 days
23 Apr 2027
Close · CADC$6.92
1D+0.1%
1W+1.3%
1M+29.4%
3M+118.3%
6M+64.8%
YTDn/a
1Yn/a
ATR %2.1%
52w lowhigh0.9% off high

What Roxmore Resources does

Employees: 13

Roxmore Resources at a glance

Size Roxmore Resources (RM.TO) is a Canada Materials company (Other Metals/Minerals) with a market value of $357M, the 390th largest of 420 Canada companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at C$6.92 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 64.8%, against -35.2% for the median peer and +5.2% for the Canada market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 21 in its peer set.

Valuation It trades at 6.05× book value against a peer median of 1.83× (4th most expensive of 21).

Price implies The share price implies a return on equity of about 97.7%; Roxmore Resources delivers -18.8%, so the price asks more than the business earns today.

Next results Next results expected around 23 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026RM.TO 167Peer median 63
Six months, rebased to 100: Roxmore Resources against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Roxmore Resources financials

Reported figures in CAD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueC$0C$0C$0C$0C$0
Revenue growth—————
Gross profitC$0C$0C$0C$0C$0
EBITDAn/an/a-C$4.37M-C$481,260-C$327,190
Net income-C$10.3M-C$15.6M-C$4.37M-C$1.72M-C$901,201
Free cash flow-C$13.8M-C$18.2M-C$5.43MC$449,720-C$1.21M
Capital expenditureC$14.3MC$9.17MC$1.12MC$0C$0
Total debtC$160,113C$0C$0C$0C$0

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Roxmore Resources competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-50%-25%0%+25%2009300828SLIA1MNDMVULSLVR336370A4NLZMTTSJMSSTP600281SICOBRE603527ARARM.TO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Roxmore Resources is the large dot.

Fundamentals: return on equity against price-to-book

-200%-100%0%00×1000×2009300828NDMTTS600281TMQRM.TOReturn on equity →Price / book →
A bank or insurer earning more on its equity usually trades at a higher multiple of book; points far above the trend are priced for more. Roxmore Resources is the large dot.

Capital: ROE delivered against the ROE the price implies

0%500%1,000%1,500%2,000%0%1,000%2,000%2009300828NDMTTS600281RM.TOROE delivered →ROE the price implies →
Above the diagonal = the price asks for a higher return on equity than the business earns today. Roxmore Resources is the large dot.

Roxmore Resources competitors and peer comparison

How Roxmore Resources compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Roxmore Resources against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureRM.TOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+29.4%-21.5%highest of 21
6-month return+64.8%-35.2%2nd highest of 21
Return on equity-18.8%-6.6%6th lowest of 20
Price / book6.05×1.83×4th most expensive of 21
ROE the price implies97.7%17.6%4th most demanding of 21
ROE delivered-18.8%-5.9%6th lowest of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROEDelivered ROE
Roxmore Resources RM.TOCanada$357M+65%n/a-19%6.05×97.7%-18.8%
First Copper Technology 2009.TWTaiwan$355M-14%+7%5%1.34×6.9%4.7%
Tianjin Ruixin Technology 300828.SZChina$353M-35%+22%5%2.90×26.0%4.5%
Standard Lithium SLI.VCanada$365M-62%n/a-15%0.97×15.9%-15.5%
AIC Mines A1M.AXAustralia$349M-2%+29%13%1.46×8.1%13.3%
Northern Dynasty Minerals NDM.TOCanada$349M-69%n/a-261%42.65×198.2%-261.3%
Vulcan Energy Resources VUL.AXAustralia$370M-70%-33%-18%0.47×9.5%-17.9%
Silver Tiger Metals SLVR.TOCanada$344M-12%n/a-4%1.97×28.7%-3.9%
Solus Advanced Materials 336370.KSSouth Korea$343M-52%+1%-7%0.74×7.4%-6.6%
Alpha HPA A4N.AXAustralia$372M-42%+135%-14%1.31×14.6%-13.5%
Western Copper and Gold WRN.TOCanada$339M-48%n/a-3%1.70×19.3%-2.6%
Lifezone Metals LZMUnited States$378M-30%+652%-17%4.24×39.2%n/a
Tintina Mines TTS.VCanada$380M+219%n/a-100%173.11×2,008.6%-99.6%
Jupiter Mines JMS.AXAustralia$334M-16%-2%7%0.83×7.2%6.6%
Stalprodukt STP.WAPoland$333M-1%-7%-1%0.34×5.1%-1.5%
Shanxi Huayang New Material 600281.SSChina$385M-11%+10%-59%14.25×102.7%-59.5%
Silverco Mining SICO.VCanada$331M-17%n/a-19%2.07×29.0%-19.4%
Trilogy Metals TMQ.TOCanada$391M-50%n/a-39%3.22×29.5%-39.3%
Brazilian Rare Earths BRE.AXAustralia$324M-69%n/an/a3.55×27.2%n/a
Anhui Zhongyuan New Materials 603527.SSChina$396M-36%+59%1%1.25×11.2%1.1%
Aclara Resources ARA.TOCanada$402M-50%n/a-5%1.98×12.9%-5.2%

Questions

Which companies are Roxmore Resources's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: First Copper Technology (2009.TW), Tianjin Ruixin Technology (300828.SZ), Standard Lithium (SLI.V), AIC Mines (A1M.AX), Northern Dynasty Minerals (NDM.TO), Vulcan Energy Resources (VUL.AX), Silver Tiger Metals (SLVR.TO), Solus Advanced Materials (336370.KS).
Is Roxmore Resources expensive compared with its peers?
On price / book it trades at 6.05× against a peer median of 1.83×, 4th most expensive of 21 in its peer set. The share price implies a return on equity of about 97.7%; Roxmore Resources delivers -18.8%, so the price asks more than the business earns today.
How has Roxmore Resources stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +64.8% against -35.2% for the median peer.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.