Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 2009.TW First Copper Technology Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

First Copper Technology Co., Ltd.2009.TWCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Materials›Other Metals/Minerals
Momentum neutral 41
Mkt cap
$355M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
61%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$1.48M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-3.9 pp
WACC 5.1%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · TWDNT$32.60
1D-4.1%
1W-11.8%
1M-16.8%
3M-13.2%
6M-14.0%
YTD-32.4%
1Y-20.5%
ATR %3.8%
52w lowhigh43.0% off high

What First Copper Technology does

Employees: 248

First Copper Technology at a glance

Size First Copper Technology (2009.TW) is a Taiwan Materials company (Other Metals/Minerals) with a market value of $355M, the 582nd largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$32.60 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 14.0%, against -33.2% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 7th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 6.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +21.7%); the operating margin is 5.2% (peer median -8.0%).

Valuation It trades at 4.2× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 4.3× (7th cheapest of 13).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.9 points below its cost of capital (5.1% WACC).

Relative performance

608010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20262009.TW 85Peer median 66
Six months, rebased to 100: First Copper Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

First Copper Technology financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$3.19BNT$2.91BNT$3.13BNT$2.65BNT$2.90B
Revenue growth—-7%+18%-9%—
Gross profitNT$229M-NT$11.8MNT$118M-NT$11.2M-NT$48.5M
EBITDANT$258MNT$15.5MNT$142MNT$14.2M-NT$34.1M
Net incomeNT$370MNT$122MNT$266M-NT$9.49MNT$197M
Free cash flow-NT$159MNT$116MNT$209MNT$148M-NT$84.7M
Capital expenditureNT$138MNT$81.3MNT$86.7MNT$50.7MNT$79.1M
Total debtNT$1.76BNT$1.47BNT$1.43BNT$1.56BNT$1.62B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

First Copper Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-50%-25%0%+25%300828RMA1MNDMSLISLVR336370VULWRNA4NJMSSTPLZMSICOTTS600281BRE6035272009.TW6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. First Copper Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+200%+400%+600%0×200×400×300828A1MVULA4NLZM2009.TWRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. First Copper Technology is the large dot.

First Copper Technology competitors and peer comparison

How First Copper Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

First Copper Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure2009.TWPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-16.8%-13.4%10th lowest of 21
6-month return-14.0%-33.2%7th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-43.0%-48.8%8th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+6.8%+21.7%5th lowest of 12
Operating margin5.2%-8.0%5th highest of 13
EV / Sales4.2×4.3×7th cheapest of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital-3.9 pp-21.4 pp5th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA51.7×5.1×most expensive of 4
Net debt / EBITDA6.3×-1.1×most indebted of 5

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
First Copper Technology 2009.TWTaiwan$355M-14%+7%5%4.2×n/an/a
Tianjin Ruixin Technology 300828.SZChina$353M-35%+22%6%3.1×n/an/a
Roxmore Resources RM.TOCanada$357M+65%n/an/an/an/an/a
AIC Mines A1M.AXAustralia$349M-2%+29%25%2.2×n/an/a
Northern Dynasty Minerals NDM.TOCanada$349M-69%n/an/an/an/an/a
Standard Lithium SLI.VCanada$365M-62%n/an/an/an/an/a
Silver Tiger Metals SLVR.TOCanada$344M-12%n/an/an/an/an/a
Solus Advanced Materials 336370.KSSouth Korea$343M-52%+1%-14%2.6×n/an/a
Vulcan Energy Resources VUL.AXAustralia$370M-70%-33%-1,075%33.8×n/an/a
Western Copper and Gold WRN.TOCanada$339M-48%n/an/an/an/an/a
Alpha HPA A4N.AXAustralia$372M-42%+135%-6,320%541.5×n/an/a
Jupiter Mines JMS.AXAustralia$334M-16%-2%25%51.0×44.2%+2.5%
Stalprodukt STP.WAPoland$333M-1%-7%-2%0.2×n/an/a
Lifezone Metals LZMUnited States$378M-30%+652%-850%178.6×n/an/a
Silverco Mining SICO.VCanada$331M-17%n/a-148%40.9×n/an/a
Tintina Mines TTS.VCanada$380M+219%n/an/an/an/an/a
Shanxi Huayang New Material 600281.SSChina$385M-11%+10%-20%5.5×n/an/a
Brazilian Rare Earths BRE.AXAustralia$324M-69%n/an/an/an/an/a
Trilogy Metals TMQ.TOCanada$391M-50%n/an/an/an/an/a
Anhui Zhongyuan New Materials 603527.SSChina$396M-36%+59%0%0.3×n/an/a
Pondy Oxides & Chemicals POCL.NSIndia$317M-32%+49%6%0.9×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are First Copper Technology's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Tianjin Ruixin Technology (300828.SZ), Roxmore Resources (RM.TO), AIC Mines (A1M.AX), Northern Dynasty Minerals (NDM.TO), Standard Lithium (SLI.V), Silver Tiger Metals (SLVR.TO), Solus Advanced Materials (336370.KS), Vulcan Energy Resources (VUL.AX).
Is First Copper Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 4.2× against a peer median of 4.3×, 7th cheapest of 13 in its peer set.
How has First Copper Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -14.0% against -33.2% for the median peer; over one year -20.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.