Loading…

Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.PTENCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Energy›Oil & Gas Production

Provides onshore drilling rigs, pressure pumping (hydraulic fracturing) and directional drilling services to oil & gas producers.

Momentum weak 31
Mkt cap
$3.76B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
98%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$89.9M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
26.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-7.6 pp
WACC 8.0%
Hurdle
+9 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BBB- / BBB-
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
96 days
10 Feb 2027
Close · USD$9.92
1D-0.3%
1W-25.5%
1M-13.6%
3M-9.7%
6M-13.1%
YTD+62.4%
1Y+63.4%
ATR %6.4%
Beta-0.27
52w lowhigh25.9% off high

What Patterson-UTI Energy does

Provides onshore drilling rigs, pressure pumping (hydraulic fracturing) and directional drilling services to oil & gas producers.

Rents rigs and crews at a daily rate under contracts of varying length and charges pumping crews by the job, so rig counts and producers' completion activity set volumes. The 2023 all-stock merger with NexTier made it one of the largest US pressure pumpers as well as a drilling contractor.

Products and services

  • Contract land drilling rigs
  • Pressure pumping/hydraulic fracturing
  • Directional drilling services

Customers

  • Onshore US oil & gas E&P operators

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Energy
  • Oilfield services
  • Contract drilling & pressure pumping

What could go right

  • Rising US onshore drilling and completions activity
  • Efficiency gains from automation

What could go wrong

  • Oil & gas capex cyclicality
  • Oversupply of drilling/pumping capacity

Moat: narrow (scale, installed base). Large fleet of modern, high-spec rigs and pumping equipment, but a highly cyclical, price-competitive service.

Headquarters: Houston, Texas, United States · Founded: 1978 · Employees: 7,900

Named competitors

Patterson-UTI Energy at a glance

Size Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN) is a United States Energy company (Oil & Gas Production) with a market value of $3.76B, the 1386th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $9.92 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 13.1%, against -8.3% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 7th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue was unchanged over the last twelve months (peer median +11.3%); the operating margin is 0.4% (peer median 29.6%).

Valuation It trades at 26.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 7.9× (3rd most expensive of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 43% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +34%, so the hurdle is +9 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 7.6 points below its cost of capital (8.0% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $424M at 30 Sep 2026, up 66% on a year earlier — 0.1 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Credit Patterson-UTI Energy has 3 bonds outstanding ($1.24B), rated BBB- by the agencies and trading like BBB- at a weighted spread of 139 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 7.1% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 10 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 91PTEN 84
Six months, rebased to 100: Patterson-UTI Energy against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Patterson-UTI Energy financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$4.84B$4.83B$5.38B$4.15B$2.65B
Revenue growth—-10%+30%+57%—
Gross profit$286M$230M$286M$604M$317M
EBITDA$896M$915M$1.19B$1.16B$684M
Net income-$25.0M-$93.6M-$968M$246M$155M
Free cash flow$266M$372M$497M$390M$129M
Capital expenditure$552M$589M$678M$616M$437M
Total debt$1.29B$1.28B$1.30B$1.35B$856M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Patterson-UTI Energy competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-30%-20%-10%0%-10%0%CRKTPZ605090IPCOCNXMURGPORTALONOGHBRMGYWTTRVISTSEPLENOGSDEVETMAUNEXTBNORPTEN6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Patterson-UTI Energy is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+25%+50%+75%+100%20×40×CRKTPZ605090IPCOCNXMURGPORNOGHBRMGYWTTRVISTSEPLSDEVETBNORPTENRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Patterson-UTI Energy is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+50%+100%0%50%100%TPZ605090CNXGPORMGYVISTSEPLENOGPTENGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Patterson-UTI Energy is the large dot.

Patterson-UTI Energy competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (PTEN vs HP vs PUMP vs LBRT)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Patterson-UTI Energy PTEN$3.76B-13%0%0%26.0×42.6%
Helmerich & Payne HP$3.52B-7%+17%3%26.3×19.9%
ProPetro PUMP$785M-59%-6%0%35.1×n/a
Liberty Energy LBRT$1.95B-64%+14%2%n/an/a

How Patterson-UTI Energy compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Patterson-UTI Energy against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasurePTENPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-13.6%-8.1%5th lowest of 21
6-month return-13.1%-8.3%7th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-25.9%-27.0%9th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)0.0%+11.3%6th lowest of 20
Operating margin0.4%29.6%lowest of 20
Forward P/E26.0×7.9×3rd most expensive of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)42.6%-3.7%most demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)+33.8%+18.6%4th highest of 13
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+8.8 pp-23.7 ppmost demanding of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital-7.6 pp+3.0 pplowest of 21
EV / EBITDA5.3×4.5×7th most expensive of 19
Net debt / EBITDA1.1×1.1×10th least indebted of 19
Bond spread139 bp213 bp2nd tightest of 9

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Patterson-UTI Energy PTENUnited States$3.76B-13%0%0%26.0×42.6%+33.8%
Comstock Resources CRKUnited States$3.94B-5%+17%19%43.4×n/an/a
Topaz Energy TPZ.TOCanada$3.17B-9%+22%60%22.8×5.9%+29.4%
Jiangxi Jovo Energy 605090.SSChina$3.02B-37%-7%9%11.8×-0.6%+17.9%
International Petroleum Corp. (British Columbia) IPCO.TOCanada$2.85B0%+11%19%11.2×n/an/a
CNX Resources CNXUnited States$4.99B-2%+8%40%9.3×-5.8%+14.6%
Murphy Oil MURUnited States$5.16B-3%+8%22%8.6×-0.7%+9.0%
Gulfport Energy GPORUnited States$2.65B-16%+27%42%6.3×-13.4%+10.6%
Talos Energy TALOUnited States$2.48B-1%+13%14%7.9×-5.0%+25.3%
Northern Oil and Gas NOGUnited States$2.43B-2%-3%30%4.9×n/an/a
Harbour Energy HBR.LUnited Kingdom$6.17B-8%+17%40%5.1×n/an/a
Magnolia Oil & Gas MGYUnited States$6.34B-15%+11%38%7.4×3.4%+19.4%
Select Water Solutions WTTRUnited States$2.09B-4%-2%4%28.9×n/an/a
Vista Energy SAB de CV Sponsored ADR VISTUnited States$6.91B-12%+84%40%4.6×-13.4%+55.3%
Seplat Energy SEPL.LUnited Kingdom$7.14B+56%+25%27%19.7×-7.1%+38.0%
Energean ENOG.LUnited Kingdom$1.72B-19%+9%27%4.2×-2.4%+126.8%
Spartan Delta SDE.TOCanada$1.63B-11%+93%32%7.6×n/an/a
Vermilion Energy VET.TOCanada$1.61B-9%-2%14%4.3×-0.8%+9.1%
Etablissements Maurel & Prom MAU.PAFrance$1.57B-29%-11%31%5.4×n/an/a
NextDecade NEXTUnited States$1.56B-23%n/an/an/an/an/a
BlueNord BNOR.OLNorway$1.49B-6%+28%32%10.9×-12.2%+15.0%

Patterson-UTI Energy bonds and credit

Patterson-UTI Energy has 3 bonds outstanding with $1.24B face value. The agencies rate it BBB-; its bonds trade like BBB-. Weighted yield 6.09%, a spread of 139 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Patterson-UTI Energy backlog

Patterson-UTI Energy reported $424M of remaining performance obligations at 30 Sep 2026, up 66% from a year earlier and up 16% from the previous quarter. That is 0.1 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: 1.04.

Questions

Who are Patterson-UTI Energy's main competitors?
Named competitors: Helmerich & Payne (HP), ProPetro Holding (PUMP), Liberty Energy (LBRT). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Comstock Resources (CRK), Topaz Energy (TPZ.TO), Jiangxi Jovo Energy (605090.SS), International Petroleum Corp. (British Columbia) (IPCO.TO), CNX Resources (CNX), Murphy Oil (MUR).
Is Patterson-UTI Energy expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 26.0× against a peer median of 7.9×, 3rd most expensive of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 43% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +34%, so the hurdle is +9 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Patterson-UTI Energy stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -13.1% against -8.3% for the median peer; over one year +63.4%.
What is Patterson-UTI Energy's backlog?
Patterson-UTI Energy's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $424M at 30 Sep 2026, +66% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.