Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › PRTC.L PureTech Health PLCOpen in the cockpit ↗

PureTech Health PLCPRTC.LCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United Kingdom · GBP·Health Care›Biotechnology
Momentum neutral 40
Mkt cap
$394M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
92%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$635,990
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-56.9 pp
WACC 12.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
174 days
29 Apr 2027
Close · GBP£119.40
1D-2.0%
1W+1.7%
1M+10.6%
3M+0.5%
6M-7.6%
YTD-4.5%
1Y-4.9%
ATR %4.0%
52w lowhigh16.9% off high

What PureTech Health does

No business profile yet.

PureTech Health at a glance

Size PureTech Health (PRTC.L) is a United Kingdom Health Care company (Biotechnology) with a market value of $394M, the 327th largest of 363 United Kingdom companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at £119.40 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 7.6%, against -32.8% for the median peer and +3.6% for the United Kingdom market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 4.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.2%); the operating margin is -1,616.9% (peer median -59.9%).

Valuation It trades at 28.4× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 5.3× (5th most expensive of 16).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 56.9 points below its cost of capital (12.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 29 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026PRTC.L 91Peer median 70
Six months, rebased to 100: PureTech Health against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

PureTech Health financials

Reported figures in GBP; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue£4.74M£3.54M£3.78M£2.68M£12.7M
Revenue growth—-6%+41%-79%—
Gross profit£2.28M£994,772£983,713-£1.29Mn/a
EBITDA-£74.2M-£72.2M-£104M-£114M-£153M
Net income£1.35M-£83.3M£41.9M-£52.9M-£40.9M
Free cash flow-£61.2M-£64.6M-£105M-£85.3M-£147M
Capital expenditure£4,481£4,553£8,608£197,096£1.77M
Total debtn/a£14.7M£18.0M£20.0M£61.7M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

PureTech Health competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%-20%0%ZURAEDIT4760602480476830300381ALTCCCCCTNM6998PRTA688687AGMBCRMD2509KMDA456160ARVNSRZNLYELPRTC.L6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. PureTech Health is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+500%+1,000%+1,500%0×2,500×5,000×7,500×EDIT476060476830ALT6998PRTACRMD456160LYELPRTC.LRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. PureTech Health is the large dot.

PureTech Health competitors and peer comparison

How PureTech Health compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

PureTech Health against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasurePRTC.LPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+10.6%-13.4%2nd highest of 21
6-month return-7.6%-32.8%2nd highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-16.9%-51.1%highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-4.1%+7.2%6th lowest of 17
Operating margin-1,616.9%-59.9%4th lowest of 17
EV / Sales28.4×5.3×5th most expensive of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital-56.9 pp-9.0 pp3rd lowest of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
PureTech Health PRTC.LUnited Kingdom$394M-8%-4%-1,617%28.4×n/an/a
Zura Bio ZURAUnited States$394M-15%n/an/an/an/an/a
Editas Medicine EDITUnited States$395M-17%+21%-178%5.4×n/an/a
Onconic Therapeutics 476060.KSSouth Korea$391M-45%+179%21%5.7×2.0%+725.2%
Beijing Luzhu Biotechnology 2480.HKHong Kong$390M-33%n/an/an/an/an/a
Rznomics 476830.KSSouth Korea$386M-79%-72%-1,440%244.5×n/an/a
Guangdong Vtr Bio-Tech 300381.SZChina$384M-23%-4%-4%2.7×n/an/a
Altimmune ALTUnited States$405M-33%+55%-320,726%3,686.9×n/an/a
C4 Therapeutics CCCCUnited States$381M+5%+2%-288%5.3×n/an/a
Contineum Therapeutics CTNMUnited States$381M-34%n/an/an/an/an/a
Edding Genor 6998.HKHong Kong$408M-45%+1,418%26%0.9×-15.8%+197.3%
Prothena PRTAUnited States$409M-26%+427%-110%2.4×n/an/a
Beijing Kawin Technology Share-Holding 688687.SSChina$410M-19%+3%0%1.6×43.0%+8.9%
AgomAb Therapeutics NV ADR AGMBUnited States$376M-37%n/an/an/an/an/a
CorMedix CRMDUnited States$415M-33%+280%47%0.7×n/an/a
Qyuns Therapeutics 2509.HKHong Kong$415M-17%+230%56%2.5×-20.2%n/a
Kamada KMDAUnited States$417M-15%+11%14%1.8×4.1%+6.5%
G2GBIO 456160.KSSouth Korea$370M-65%-45%-2,884%775.0×n/an/a
Arvinas ARVNUnited States$420M-37%-12%-10%n/an/an/a
Surrozen SRZNUnited States$364M-35%-9%-385%23.3×n/an/a
Lyell Immunopharma LYELUnited States$364M-23%-55%-729,281%7,653.4×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are PureTech Health's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Zura Bio (ZURA), Editas Medicine (EDIT), Onconic Therapeutics (476060.KS), Beijing Luzhu Biotechnology (2480.HK), Rznomics (476830.KS), Guangdong Vtr Bio-Tech (300381.SZ), Altimmune (ALT), C4 Therapeutics (CCCC).
Is PureTech Health expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 28.4× against a peer median of 5.3×, 5th most expensive of 16 in its peer set.
How has PureTech Health stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -7.6% against -32.8% for the median peer; over one year -4.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.