Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › CCCC C4 Therapeutics, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

C4 Therapeutics, Inc.CCCCCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Health Care›Biotechnology
Momentum neutral 51
Mkt cap
$381M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
92%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$9.02M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-176.2 pp
WACC 18.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
111 days
25 Feb 2027
Close · USD$3.10
1D+5.1%
1W-8.0%
1M+8.8%
3M-14.4%
6M+5.1%
YTD+62.3%
1Y+30.8%
ATR %7.7%
Beta1.63
52w lowhigh40.0% off high

What C4 Therapeutics does

Employees: 104

C4 Therapeutics at a glance

Size C4 Therapeutics (CCCC) is a United States Health Care company (Biotechnology) with a market value of $381M, the 2897th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $3.10 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 5.1%, against -32.9% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — highest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 2.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +2.8%); the operating margin is -288.3% (peer median -177.6%).

Valuation It trades at 5.3× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 7.1× (6th cheapest of 16).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 176.2 points below its cost of capital (18.0% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 34.7% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 25 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

7510012515011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026CCCC 98Peer median 69
Six months, rebased to 100: C4 Therapeutics against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

C4 Therapeutics financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$35.0M$35.9M$35.6M$20.8M$31.1M
Revenue growth—+1%+71%-33%—
Gross profit$27.6M$28.0M$27.7M$13.0M$23.5M
EBITDA-$93.6M-$96.5M-$109M-$131M-$122M
Net income-$101M-$105M-$105M-$132M-$128M
Free cash flow-$85.4M-$99.3M-$65.3M-$109M-$111M
Capital expenditure$523,000$607,000$180,000$1.71M$5.50M
Total debt$56.9M$60.0M$65.8M$71.0M$87.2M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

C4 Therapeutics competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-80%-60%-40%-20%0%0%+50%CTNM300381476830AGMB2480476060456160PRTCZURAEDITSRZNLYELALLO6998PRTA688687CCCC6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. C4 Therapeutics is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+500%+1,000%+1,500%0×2,500×5,000×7,500×300381476830476060456160LYEL3952ALT6998PRTACCCCRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. C4 Therapeutics is the large dot.

C4 Therapeutics competitors and peer comparison

How C4 Therapeutics compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

C4 Therapeutics against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureCCCCPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+8.8%-12.1%3rd highest of 20
6-month return+5.1%-32.9%highest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-40.0%-53.8%6th highest of 20
Revenue growth (TTM)+2.3%+2.8%8th lowest of 16
Operating margin-288.3%-177.6%8th lowest of 16
EV / Sales5.3×7.1×6th cheapest of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital-176.2 pp-17.7 pp3rd lowest of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
C4 Therapeutics CCCCUnited States$381M+5%+2%-288%5.3×n/an/a
Contineum Therapeutics CTNMUnited States$381M-34%n/an/an/an/an/a
Guangdong Vtr Bio-Tech 300381.SZChina$384M-23%-4%-4%2.7×n/an/a
Rznomics 476830.KSSouth Korea$386M-79%-72%-1,440%244.5×n/an/a
AgomAb Therapeutics NV ADR AGMBUnited States$376M-37%n/an/an/an/an/a
Beijing Luzhu Biotechnology 2480.HKHong Kong$390M-33%n/an/an/an/an/a
Onconic Therapeutics 476060.KSSouth Korea$391M-45%+179%21%5.7×2.0%+725.2%
G2GBIO 456160.KSSouth Korea$370M-65%-45%-2,884%775.0×n/an/a
PureTech Health PRTC.LUnited Kingdom$394M-8%-4%-1,617%28.4×n/an/a
Zura Bio ZURAUnited States$394M-15%n/an/an/an/an/a
Editas Medicine EDITUnited States$395M-17%+21%-178%5.4×n/an/a
Surrozen SRZNUnited States$364M-35%-9%-385%23.3×n/an/a
Lyell Immunopharma LYELUnited States$364M-23%-55%-729,281%7,653.4×n/an/a
Zhejiang Laifual Drive 3952.HKHong Kong$363Mn/a+142%-11%7.1×n/an/a
Aspen Neuroscience ASPEUnited States$362Mn/an/an/an/an/an/a
Altimmune ALTUnited States$405M-33%+55%-320,726%3,686.9×n/an/a
Allogene Therapeutics ALLOUnited States$359M-54%-100%-3,886%22.8×n/an/a
Medtide 3880.HKHong Kong$358M-9%+14%36%2.7×n/an/a
Edding Genor 6998.HKHong Kong$408M-45%+1,418%26%0.9×-15.8%+197.3%
Prothena PRTAUnited States$409M-26%+427%-110%2.4×n/an/a
Beijing Kawin Technology Share-Holding 688687.SSChina$410M-19%+3%0%1.6×43.0%+8.9%

Questions

Which companies are C4 Therapeutics's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Contineum Therapeutics (CTNM), Guangdong Vtr Bio-Tech (300381.SZ), Rznomics (476830.KS), AgomAb Therapeutics NV ADR (AGMB), Beijing Luzhu Biotechnology (2480.HK), Onconic Therapeutics (476060.KS), G2GBIO (456160.KS), PureTech Health (PRTC.L).
Is C4 Therapeutics expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 5.3× against a peer median of 7.1×, 6th cheapest of 16 in its peer set.
How has C4 Therapeutics stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +5.1% against -32.9% for the median peer; over one year +30.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.