Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › ORA Ormat Technologies, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Ormat Technologies, Inc.ORACompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Utilities›Electric Utilities

Developer and operator of geothermal power plants, plus energy-storage systems, mainly in the US and abroad.

Momentum weak 29
Mkt cap
$5.65B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$88.4M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
41.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-4.7 pp
WACC 7.8%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
110 days
24 Feb 2027
Close · USD$91.90
1D-1.2%
1W+2.5%
1M+3.7%
3M-17.7%
6M-24.5%
YTD-16.8%
1Y-19.3%
ATR %3.3%
Beta0.82
52w lowhigh37.2% off high

What Ormat Technologies does

Developer and operator of geothermal power plants, plus energy-storage systems, mainly in the US and abroad.

Earns most from selling electricity from plants it owns under long-term power purchase agreements with utilities, so output and contract price decide income, and plants run around the clock regardless of weather. It also sells geothermal equipment to other developers, in lumpy orders, and has added battery storage. The group began in Israel; its US plants are mostly in Nevada and California.

Products and services

  • Geothermal power generation
  • Energy storage systems
  • Geothermal equipment manufacturing

Customers

  • Utilities and grid operators buying baseload renew

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Utilities
  • Electric utilities
  • Geothermal power generation

What could go right

  • 24/7 clean baseload power demand (data centers)
  • New geothermal project pipeline

What could go wrong

  • Geothermal project development/drilling risk
  • Interest-rate sensitivity

Moat: narrow (IP / patents, installed base, process know-how). Deep geothermal technology expertise and long-lived, contracted power-plant assets.

Headquarters: Reno, Nevada, US · Founded: 1965 · Employees: 1,648

Named competitors

Ormat Technologies at a glance

Size Ormat Technologies (ORA) is a United States Utilities company (Electric Utilities) with a market value of $5.65B, the 1105th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $91.90 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 24.5%, against -6.3% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 31.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.3%); the operating margin is 19.4% (peer median 14.7%).

Valuation It trades at 41.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 12.9× (3rd most expensive of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.7 points below its cost of capital (7.8% WACC).

Credit Ormat Technologies has 1 bond outstanding ($191M).

Short interest Short interest is 9.7% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 24 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 95ORA 74
Six months, rebased to 100: Ormat Technologies against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Ormat Technologies financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$1.19B$990M$880M$829M$734M
Revenue growth—+12%+6%+13%—
Gross profit$332M$273M$273M$264M$269M
EBITDA$542M$486M$454M$403M$391M
Net income$127M$124M$124M$124M$65.8M
Free cash flow-$265M-$285M-$76.8M-$309M-$283M
Capital expenditure$544M$620M$488M$618M$563M
Total debt$3.41B$2.86B$2.45B$2.12B$2.05B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Ormat Technologies competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%-10%0%+10%600995PORENICHER1773ACO-XACENWE600578600726TXNM600021CIG600642BEPCTORNTPOWER001286600157000027ORA6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Ormat Technologies is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%0×100×200×600995PORENICHERACO-XACENWE600578BEPC600157ORARevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Ormat Technologies is the large dot.

Ormat Technologies competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (ORA vs NEE vs BEP-UN.TO vs CWEN)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Ormat Technologies ORA$5.65B-24%+31%19%41.2×n/a
NextEra Energy NEE$182B-6%+13%30%21.0×18.8%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP BEP-UN.TO$9.41B-7%+7%11%n/an/a
Clearway Energy CWEN$7.00B-11%+8%13%56.4×33.1%
Fluence Energy FLNC$973M-78%+7%-4%n/an/a

How Ormat Technologies compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Ormat Technologies against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureORAPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+3.7%-0.3%6th highest of 21
6-month return-24.5%-6.3%4th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-37.2%-24.6%4th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+31.1%+4.3%highest of 21
Operating margin19.4%14.7%6th highest of 21
Forward P/E41.2×12.9×3rd most expensive of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital-4.7 pp-0.7 pp2nd lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA15.9×11.7×most expensive of 12
Net debt / EBITDA5.1×4.6×6th most indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Ormat Technologies ORAUnited States$5.65B-24%+31%19%41.2×n/an/a
China Southern Power Grid Energy Storage 600995.SSChina$5.48B-21%+18%41%18.7×n/an/a
Portland General Electric PORUnited States$5.47B-5%+3%16%12.9×n/an/a
Enel Chile SA Sponsored ADR ENICUnited States$6.06B-6%+16%19%9.4×3.4%+6.9%
Hera HER.MIItaly$6.14B-3%-11%8%11.9×-8.9%+12.6%
YTL 1773.TJapan$6.14B+1%+19%19%12.5×n/an/a
ATCO ACO-X.TOCanada$6.15B+25%+5%12%16.8×15.0%+5.5%
Acea ACE.MIItaly$5.14B-7%-21%26%14.3×5.8%-3.3%
NorthWestern Energy NWEUnited States$5.09B+14%+11%19%20.6×n/an/a
Beijing Jingneng Power 600578.SSChina$5.06B+3%-6%11%11.0×-2.8%+12.2%
Huadian Energy 600726.SSChina$5.01B-33%-7%10%n/an/an/a
TXNM Energy TXNMUnited States$6.41B-1%+10%24%22.5×n/an/a
Shanghai Electric Power 600021.SSChina$4.98B-31%-6%13%8.9×n/an/a
Companhia Energetica de Minas Gerais SA Sponsored ADR Pfd CIGUnited States$6.45B-23%+13%13%9.0×-1.6%+9.4%
Shenergy 600642.SSChina$6.64B+1%-2%12%12.6×-1.6%+7.2%
Brookfield Renewable BEPCUnited States$4.79B-13%+6%19%249.6×n/an/a
Torrent Power TORNTPOWER.NSIndia$6.78B-26%+8%13%23.3×n/an/a
Shaanxi Energy Investment 001286.SZChina$4.68B-16%+4%24%12.9×-9.2%+18.6%
HK Electric Investments & HK Electric Investments 2638.HKHong Kong$6.99B-3%+4%42%17.1×3.5%+3.1%
Wintime Energy 600157.SSChina$4.55B-21%-9%7%104.2×0.8%+1.4%
Shenzhen Energy 000027.SZChina$4.49B-8%+4%13%11.2×n/an/a

Ormat Technologies bonds and credit

Ormat Technologies has 1 bond outstanding with $191M face value.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Ormat Technologies's main competitors?
Named competitors: Calpine (private or unlisted), NextEra Energy Resources (NEE), Brookfield Renewable (BEP-UN.TO), Pertamina Geothermal Energy (private or unlisted), Contact Energy (private or unlisted), Clearway Energy (CWEN). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes China Southern Power Grid Energy Storage (600995.SS), Portland General Electric (POR), Enel Chile SA Sponsored ADR (ENIC), Hera (HER.MI), YTL (1773.T), ATCO (ACO-X.TO).
Is Ormat Technologies expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 41.2× against a peer median of 12.9×, 3rd most expensive of 20 in its peer set.
How has Ormat Technologies stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -24.5% against -6.3% for the median peer; over one year -19.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.