Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 600995.SS China Southern Power Grid Energy Storage Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

China Southern Power Grid Energy Storage Co., Ltd. Class A600995.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Utilities›Electric Utilities

Energy-storage subsidiary of China Southern Power Grid, developing pumped-hydro and battery storage projects.

≈ China's a grid-scale energy-storage utility armMomentum neutral 44
Mkt cap
$5.48B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
17%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$17.7M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
18.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+0.8 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
144 days
30 Mar 2027
Close · CNYCN¥11.43
1D-0.6%
1W+4.4%
1M-5.2%
3M-12.7%
6M-20.5%
YTD-9.1%
1Y-7.4%
ATR %2.3%
52w lowhigh32.8% off high

What China Southern Power Grid Energy Storage does

Energy-storage subsidiary of China Southern Power Grid, developing pumped-hydro and battery storage projects.

In one line: China's a grid-scale energy-storage utility arm.

Products and services

  • Pumped-hydro storage
  • Battery energy storage systems

Customers

  • China Southern Power Grid

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Utilities
  • Electric Utilities
  • Grid-scale energy storage (pumped…

What could go right

  • Renewable-integration storage demand growth

What could go wrong

  • Storage-project return regulation
  • Capex intensity

Moat: narrow (regulatory licence, installed base). State grid-affiliated storage siting and licences are hard for independent developers to match.

Headquarters: Guangzhou, China · Founded: 2020 · Employees: 2,461

Named competitors

China Southern Power Grid Energy Storage at a glance

Size China Southern Power Grid Energy Storage (600995.SS) is a China Utilities company (Electric Utilities) with a market value of $5.48B, the 457th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥11.43 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 20.5%, against -6.3% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 7th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 17.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.4%); the operating margin is 41.0% (peer median 13.3%).

Valuation It trades at 18.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 12.9× (7th most expensive of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.8 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 30 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 95600995.SS 78
Six months, rebased to 100: China Southern Power Grid Energy Storage against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

China Southern Power Grid Energy Storage financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥8.23BCN¥7.38BCN¥6.05BCN¥5.48BCN¥8.13B
Revenue growth—+22%+10%-33%—
Gross profitCN¥5.53BCN¥3.73BCN¥2.75BCN¥2.39BCN¥3.81B
EBITDAn/aCN¥4.80BCN¥4.07BCN¥3.69BCN¥4.97B
Net incomeCN¥1.99BCN¥1.69BCN¥1.13BCN¥1.01BCN¥1.66B
Free cash flow-CN¥4.45B-CN¥3.99B-CN¥4.12B-CN¥3.17B-CN¥387M
Capital expenditureCN¥9.33BCN¥8.62BCN¥7.98BCN¥6.73BCN¥5.00B
Total debtCN¥32.7BCN¥29.7BCN¥21.3BCN¥17.6BCN¥12.0B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

China Southern Power Grid Energy Storage competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%-10%0%+10%PORORAACENWE600578600726600021ENICHER1773ACO-XBEPCTXNM001286CIG600157600642000027TORNTPOWER9513600995.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. China Southern Power Grid Energy Storage is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%0×100×200×PORORAACENWE600578600021ENIC1773ACO-XBEPCCIG600157600995.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. China Southern Power Grid Energy Storage is the large dot.

China Southern Power Grid Energy Storage competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (600995.SS vs 600900.SS vs 300750.SZ vs 300274.SZ)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
China Southern Power Grid Energy Storage 600995.SS$5.48B-21%+18%41%18.7×n/a
China Yangtze Power 600900.SS$110B+9%0%51%21.2×1.5%
Contemporary Amperex Technology 300750.SZ$179B-42%+51%14%13.0×1.6%
Sungrow Power Supply 300274.SZ$25.3B-40%-24%12%14.9×12.1%
BYD 002594.SZ$96.6B-17%-4%4%21.2×n/a
Fluence Energy FLNC$973M-78%+7%-4%n/an/a

How China Southern Power Grid Energy Storage compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

China Southern Power Grid Energy Storage against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure600995.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-5.2%-0.1%6th lowest of 21
6-month return-20.5%-6.3%7th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-32.8%-24.6%6th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+17.9%+4.4%3rd highest of 21
Operating margin41.0%13.3%highest of 21
Forward P/E18.7×12.9×7th most expensive of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital+0.8 pp-1.1 pp6th highest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
China Southern Power Grid Energy Storage 600995.SSChina$5.48B-21%+18%41%18.7×n/an/a
Portland General Electric PORUnited States$5.47B-5%+3%16%12.9×n/an/a
Ormat Technologies ORAUnited States$5.65B-24%+31%19%41.2×n/an/a
Acea ACE.MIItaly$5.14B-7%-21%26%14.3×5.8%-3.3%
NorthWestern Energy NWEUnited States$5.09B+14%+11%19%20.6×n/an/a
Beijing Jingneng Power 600578.SSChina$5.06B+3%-6%11%11.0×-2.8%+12.2%
Huadian Energy 600726.SSChina$5.01B-33%-7%10%n/an/an/a
Shanghai Electric Power 600021.SSChina$4.98B-31%-6%13%8.9×n/an/a
Enel Chile SA Sponsored ADR ENICUnited States$6.06B-6%+16%19%9.4×3.4%+6.9%
Hera HER.MIItaly$6.14B-3%-11%8%11.9×-8.9%+12.6%
YTL 1773.TJapan$6.14B+1%+19%19%12.5×n/an/a
ATCO ACO-X.TOCanada$6.15B+25%+5%12%16.8×15.0%+5.5%
Brookfield Renewable BEPCUnited States$4.79B-13%+6%19%249.6×n/an/a
TXNM Energy TXNMUnited States$6.41B-1%+10%24%22.5×n/an/a
Shaanxi Energy Investment 001286.SZChina$4.68B-16%+4%24%12.9×-9.2%+18.6%
Companhia Energetica de Minas Gerais SA Sponsored ADR Pfd CIGUnited States$6.45B-23%+13%13%9.0×-1.6%+9.4%
Wintime Energy 600157.SSChina$4.55B-21%-9%7%104.2×0.8%+1.4%
Shenergy 600642.SSChina$6.64B+1%-2%12%12.6×-1.6%+7.2%
Shenzhen Energy 000027.SZChina$4.49B-8%+4%13%11.2×n/an/a
Torrent Power TORNTPOWER.NSIndia$6.78B-26%+8%13%23.3×n/an/a
Electric Power Development 9513.TJapan$4.39B+2%+4%10%8.2×4.5%+5.4%

Questions

Who are China Southern Power Grid Energy Storage's main competitors?
Named competitors: China Yangtze Power (600900.SS), CATL (battery storage) (300750.SZ), Sungrow Power Supply (300274.SZ), BYD (002594.SZ), Fluence Energy (FLNC). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Portland General Electric (POR), Ormat Technologies (ORA), Acea (ACE.MI), NorthWestern Energy (NWE), Beijing Jingneng Power (600578.SS), Huadian Energy (600726.SS).
Is China Southern Power Grid Energy Storage expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 18.7× against a peer median of 12.9×, 7th most expensive of 20 in its peer set.
How has China Southern Power Grid Energy Storage stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -20.5% against -6.3% for the median peer; over one year -7.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.