Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › ONT.L Oxford Nanopore Technologies PlcOpen in the cockpit ↗

Oxford Nanopore Technologies PlcONT.LCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United Kingdom · GBP·Information Technology›Electronic Equipment/Instruments

UK maker of nanopore-based DNA/RNA sequencing devices offering real-time, long-read genetic sequencing technology.

≈ A UK Illumina challenger using nanopore sequencing techMomentum leader 99
Mkt cap
$2.71B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
37%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$5.97M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-43.9 pp
WACC 9.7%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
123 days
9 Mar 2027
Close · GBP£205.80
1D+0.5%
1W-7.5%
1M+2.5%
3M+59.7%
6M+74.5%
YTD+60.3%
1Y+47.0%
ATR %5.8%
52w lowhigh14.1% off high

What Oxford Nanopore Technologies does

UK maker of nanopore-based DNA/RNA sequencing devices offering real-time, long-read genetic sequencing technology.

Sells the sequencer once and then earns again and again on flow cells and kits, single-use parts that each run consumes, so the number of devices in use and how heavily they run matter more than box sales. It spun out of the University of Oxford and listed in London in 2021.

In one line: A UK Illumina challenger using nanopore sequencing tech.

Products and services

  • Sequencing devices (MinION, PromethION)
  • Flow cells/consumables
  • Sequencing software/bioinformatics

Customers

  • Academic/research labs
  • Pharma & biotech
  • Clinical & field genomics users

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Life sciences tools
  • Genomic sequencing
  • Nanopore sequencing instruments…

What could go right

  • Genomics research/clinical adoption growth
  • Long-read sequencing share gains

What could go wrong

  • Continued net losses/cash burn
  • Illumina's dominant installed base

Moat: narrow (IP / patents, installed base). Patented nanopore sequencing offers unique long-read, portable, real-time capability.

Headquarters: Oxford, UK · Founded: 2005 · Employees: 1,403

Named competitors

Oxford Nanopore Technologies at a glance

Size Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT.L) is a United Kingdom Information Technology company (Electronic Equipment/Instruments) with a market value of $2.71B, the 140th largest of 363 United Kingdom companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at £205.80 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 74.5%, against -25.2% for the median peer and +3.6% for the United Kingdom market (cap-weighted) — highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 14.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.7%); the operating margin is -54.5% (peer median 9.7%).

Valuation It trades at 8.0× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 3.6× (8th most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 43.9 points below its cost of capital (9.7% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 9 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015020011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026ONT.L 171Peer median 73
Six months, rebased to 100: Oxford Nanopore Technologies against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Oxford Nanopore Technologies financials

Reported figures in GBP; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue£235M£224M£183M£170M£199M
Revenue growth—+22%+8%-15%—
Gross profit£142M£104M£81.4M£72.0M£112M
EBITDA-£72.7M-£78.5M-£110M-£128M-£30.5M
Net income-£121M-£145M-£146M-£155M-£91.0M
Free cash flow-£61.2M-£66.3M-£114M-£129M-£69.2M
Capital expenditure£53.3M£45.7M£48.6M£27.3M£42.2M
Total debtn/a£41.5M£46.0M£41.7M£34.1M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Oxford Nanopore Technologies competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-40%-20%0%+20%68816760156768878500233534066880014980VAIAS30076360084830082777506036620021526886276728DBD688390002980ONT.L6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Oxford Nanopore Technologies is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%0×10×20×6881676015676887850023353406688001498060084800054730082777506036620021526886276728DBD688390002980ONT.LRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Oxford Nanopore Technologies is the large dot.

Oxford Nanopore Technologies competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (ONT.L vs ILMN vs PACB vs TMO)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
Oxford Nanopore Technologies ONT.L$2.71B+75%+15%-55%8.0×n/a
Illumina ILMN$32.2B+50%+6%21%7.3×27.1%
Pacific Biosciences of California PACB$701M+60%+2%-102%7.6×n/a
Thermo Fisher Scientific TMO$257B+50%+8%19%6.2×20.9%

How Oxford Nanopore Technologies compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Oxford Nanopore Technologies against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureONT.LPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+2.5%-11.6%3rd highest of 21
6-month return+74.5%-25.2%highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-14.1%-50.8%2nd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+14.8%+6.7%10th highest of 21
Operating margin-54.5%9.7%lowest of 21
EV / Sales8.0×3.6×8th most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-43.9 pp-0.8 pplowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Oxford Nanopore Technologies ONT.LUnited Kingdom$2.71B+75%+15%-55%8.0×n/an/a
Focuslight Technologies 688167.SSChina$2.71B-44%+22%-9%19.2×n/an/a
Ningbo Sanxing Medical Electric 601567.SSChina$2.66B-37%-11%3%1.4×4.8%+15.1%
Shenzhen CSL Vacuum Science & Technology 688785.SSChina$2.62B-21%-2%18%27.3×n/an/a
Kehua Data 002335.SZChina$2.81B-41%+5%5%2.3×16.7%+14.4%
GeniuS Electronic Optical 3406.TWTaiwan$2.81B+59%+16%20%3.1×5.9%+9.5%
Suzhou HYC Technology 688001.SSChina$2.59B-31%+19%6%7.1×37.6%+5.9%
Dexerials 4980.TJapan$2.55B-4%+5%35%3.5×15.0%+11.6%
Vaisala VAIAS.HEFinland$2.54B+22%+2%16%3.6×9.7%+9.5%
Ginlong Technologies 300763.SZChina$2.98B-47%+4%11%3.5×10.0%+27.2%
Shanghai Lingang 600848.SSChina$3.00B-9%-26%15%8.2×12.9%+15.1%
Addsino 000547.SZChina$3.02B-49%-6%-54%9.2×n/an/a
Sineng Electric 300827.SZChina$2.35B-25%+29%12%2.4×n/an/a
Syntec Technology 7750.TWTaiwan$3.15B-46%+60%25%4.9×17.2%+24.3%
Keli Sensing Technology (Ningbo) 603662.SSChina$2.28B-4%+24%19%8.7×24.7%+13.4%
GRG Banking Equipment 002152.SZChina$3.26B-25%0%9%1.5×4.0%+13.5%
Shenzhen SEICHI Technologies 688627.SSChina$3.37B-24%+65%3%11.8×n/an/a
ULVAC 6728.TJapan$2.01B-34%+7%7%0.9×14.1%+8.0%
Diebold Nixdorf DBDUnited States$1.96B-25%+6%9%0.7×-2.0%-0.5%
Goodwe Technologies 688390.SSChina$1.93B-51%+53%5%1.3×17.4%+41.2%
Shenzhen Everbest Machinery Industry 002980.SZChina$1.90B-16%+64%23%10.2×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Oxford Nanopore Technologies's main competitors?
Named competitors: Illumina (ILMN), Pacific Biosciences (PACB), Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Focuslight Technologies (688167.SS), Ningbo Sanxing Medical Electric (601567.SS), Shenzhen CSL Vacuum Science & Technology (688785.SS), Kehua Data (002335.SZ), GeniuS Electronic Optical (3406.TW), Suzhou HYC Technology (688001.SS).
Is Oxford Nanopore Technologies expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 8.0× against a peer median of 3.6×, 8th most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Oxford Nanopore Technologies stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +74.5% against -25.2% for the median peer; over one year +47.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.