Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › NPST.NS Network People Services Technologies LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

Network People Services Technologies LimitedNPST.NSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

India · INR·IT›Packaged Software
Momentum leader 90
Mkt cap
$392M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
32%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$556,329
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-9.1 pp
WACC 16.4%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · INR₹1,776
1D+1.3%
1W+11.0%
1M-4.2%
3M+17.6%
6M+43.8%
YTD+27.0%
1Y-5.9%
ATR %5.0%
Beta1.56
52w lowhigh8.2% off high

What Network People Services Technologies does

Employees: 354

Network People Services Technologies at a glance

Size Network People Services Technologies (NPST.NS) is an India Information Technology company (Packaged Software) with a market value of $392M, the 948th largest of 1,058 India companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₹1,776 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 43.8%, against -10.1% for the median peer and 0.0% for the India market (cap-weighted) — highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 47.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +11.1%); the operating margin is 19.7% (peer median 10.8%).

Valuation It trades at 17.0× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 3.3× (7th most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 9.1 points below its cost of capital (16.4% WACC).

Relative performance

10012515011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026NPST.NS 143Peer median 90
Six months, rebased to 100: Network People Services Technologies against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Network People Services Technologies financials

Reported figures in INR; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₹2.18B₹1.95B₹1.73B₹1.28B₹408M
Revenue growth—+13%+36%+212%—
Gross profit₹563M₹549M₹718M₹439M₹130M
EBITDA₹547M₹514M₹605M₹429M₹121M
Net income₹447M₹408M₹452M₹269M₹65.2M
Free cash flown/a-₹810M₹253M₹506M₹62.9M
Capital expendituren/a₹473M₹108M₹27.3M₹60.7M
Total debtn/a₹138M₹95.9M₹28.4M₹2.04M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Network People Services Technologies competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%-20%-10%0%001220441997903000523733ABXXAYA166AKAMBI7781390542596882299928300807EOL16753962API688657NPST.NS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Network People Services Technologies is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%+300%0×100×200×00122044199790300052ABXXAYA166A3905NPST.NSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Network People Services Technologies is the large dot.

Network People Services Technologies competitors and peer comparison

How Network People Services Technologies compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Network People Services Technologies against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureNPST.NSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-4.2%-9.1%9th highest of 21
6-month return+43.8%-10.1%highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-8.2%-36.4%2nd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+47.2%+11.1%3rd highest of 21
Operating margin19.7%10.8%4th highest of 21
EV / Sales17.0×3.3×7th most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-9.1 pp+4.1 pp6th lowest of 19
EV / EBITDA67.8×8.0×most expensive of 11
Net debt / EBITDA-5.4×-0.8×least indebted of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Network People Services Technologies NPST.NSIndia$392M+44%+47%20%17.0×n/an/a
Shimeng Supply Chain Management 001220.SZChina$392M-29%-17%16%2.3×-0.1%+1.9%
Finatext 4419.TJapan$392M+6%+44%16%5.0×n/an/a
Fukui Computer 9790.TJapan$393M-9%+10%43%2.4×-17.7%+5.3%
Shenzhen ZQgame 300052.SZChina$391M-15%-18%-17%17.6×n/an/a
Software Service 3733.TJapan$389M0%+23%17%1.0×-13.3%+15.6%
Abaxx Technologies ABXX.TOCanada$396M-72%+304%-2,744%189.8×n/an/a
Artrya AYA.AXAustralia$397M-27%0%-97,479%17,814.0×n/an/a
TASUKI 166A.TJapan$398M+27%+45%14%1.3×n/an/a
Kambi KAMBI.STSweden$398M0%-10%9%2.0×6.1%+7.7%
TPIsoftware 7781.TWOTaiwan$386M-32%-16%-32%17.1×n/an/a
Datasection 3905.TJapan$384M+6%+1,178%22%1.5×n/an/a
ExaWizards 4259.TJapan$384M-11%+28%13%4.1×40.9%+35.6%
Bonree Data Technology 688229.SSChina$382M-33%-21%-93%20.1×n/an/a
Miroku Jyoho Service 9928.TJapan$382M+27%+6%15%1.0×-11.7%+7.5%
Zhengzhou Tiamaes Technology 300807.SZChina$379M-45%-28%-19%17.9×44.1%-5.8%
Energy One EOL.AXAustralia$379M+3%+14%17%7.9×18.7%+20.3%
AsiaInfo Technologies 1675.HKHong Kong$379M-49%-3%-3%0.3×-13.9%+0.2%
CHANGE Holdings,Inc 3962.TJapan$407M-3%+12%20%1.4×-13.0%+38.0%
Agora, Inc. Sponsored ADR APIUnited States$408M-2%+14%-5%1.1×n/an/a
Gstarsoft 688657.SSChina$415M-19%+17%8%4.1×28.1%+12.1%

Questions

Which companies are Network People Services Technologies's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Shimeng Supply Chain Management (001220.SZ), Finatext (4419.T), Fukui Computer (9790.T), Shenzhen ZQgame (300052.SZ), Software Service (3733.T), Abaxx Technologies (ABXX.TO), Artrya (AYA.AX), TASUKI (166A.T).
Is Network People Services Technologies expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 17.0× against a peer median of 3.3×, 7th most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Network People Services Technologies stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +43.8% against -10.1% for the median peer; over one year -5.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.