Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › MSLH.L Marshalls plcOpen in the cockpit ↗

Marshalls plcMSLH.LCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United Kingdom · GBP·Materials›Construction Materials
Momentum leader 86
Mkt cap
$597M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
89%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$2.92M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
11.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-6.2 pp
WACC 10.9%
Hurdle
+2 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
136 days
22 Mar 2027
Close · GBP£176.40
1D-1.9%
1W+1.3%
1M+13.1%
3M+4.3%
6M+40.2%
YTD-2.3%
1Y+5.8%
ATR %4.2%
52w lowhigh5.5% off high

What Marshalls does

Employees: 2,348

Marshalls at a glance

Size Marshalls (MSLH.L) is a United Kingdom Materials company (Construction Materials) with a market value of $597M, the 273rd largest of 363 United Kingdom companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at £176.40 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 40.2%, against -12.1% for the median peer and +3.6% for the United Kingdom market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 0.2% over the last twelve months (peer median -3.1%); the operating margin is 8.4% (peer median 6.4%).

Valuation It trades at 11.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 24.4× (cheapest of 10).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is +2 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 6.2 points below its cost of capital (10.9% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 22 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012014011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026MSLH.L 136Peer median 86
Six months, rebased to 100: Marshalls against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Marshalls financials

Reported figures in GBP; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue£630M£632M£619M£671M£719M
Revenue growth—+2%-8%-7%—
Gross profit£209M£210M£213M£220M£251M
EBITDA£101M£108M£103M£96.3M£133M
Net income£20.7M£14.4M£31.0M£18.6M£26.8M
Free cash flow£42.4M£25.8M£67.6M£59.5M£57.5M
Capital expenditure£12.4M£13.6M£11.6M£20.8M£30.1M
Total debtn/a£182M£188M£252M£293M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Marshalls competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%+50%-20%0%+20%6881197943603916RMIX5351605086WGN0025961518002457600802000965000789300135600881003012P52FORTMSLH.L6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Marshalls is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%50×100×7943603916605086WGN000789003012P52FORTMSLH.LRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Marshalls is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%20%40%68811979435351605086WGN0025961104002457000789300135600881003012P52FORTMSLH.LGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Marshalls is the large dot.

Marshalls competitors and peer comparison

How Marshalls compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Marshalls against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureMSLH.LPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+13.1%-5.1%2nd highest of 21
6-month return+40.2%-12.1%2nd highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-5.5%-35.3%highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-0.2%-3.1%8th highest of 20
Operating margin8.4%6.4%6th highest of 21
Forward P/E11.8×24.4×cheapest of 10
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)8.2%3.7%6th most demanding of 17
Growth delivered (Del g)+6.1%+3.1%5th highest of 17
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+2.0 pp+0.9 pp7th most demanding of 17
ROIC minus cost of capital-6.2 pp-2.5 pp8th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA6.2×9.4×3rd cheapest of 9
Net debt / EBITDA1.7×1.6×4th most indebted of 9

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Marshalls MSLH.LUnited Kingdom$597M+40%0%8%11.8×8.2%+6.1%
Sinosteel Luonai Materials Technology 688119.SSChina$597M-32%-2%-13%n/a3.7%-0.3%
Nichiha 7943.TJapan$599M-10%-3%7%13.0×-3.7%+3.5%
Sobute New Materials 603916.SSChina$573M-24%-3%7%27.1×1.5%-0.5%
Stewards SWRDUnited States$555Mn/a+30%-100%n/an/an/a
Suncrete RMIXUnited States$646M-47%n/a1%61.2×n/an/a
Shinagawa Refra 5351.TJapan$551M-3%+25%7%n/a0.5%+12.2%
Longyan Kaolin Clay 605086.SSChina$550M-37%-9%39%24.4×20.5%+4.9%
Wagners WGN.AXAustralia$650M-4%+17%12%20.7×10.2%+9.5%
Hainan RuiZe New Building Material 002596.SZChina$544M-16%-16%-16%n/a35.7%-16.7%
Universal Cement 1104.TWTaiwan$543M-7%-5%16%n/a-2.2%+7.9%
Mitsui Matsushima 1518.TJapan$526M+57%+9%14%n/a3.7%+2.7%
Qinglong Pipes Industry 002457.SZChina$507M-12%+4%6%n/a0.0%+5.1%
Fujian Cement 600802.SSChina$502M+29%-22%-23%n/an/an/a
Tianjin Tianbao Infrastructure 000965.SZChina$476M-23%+65%8%n/an/an/a
Jiangxi Wannianqing Cement 000789.SZChina$471M-21%-28%-9%98.5×24.3%-18.3%
Jiangsu Baoli Asphalt 300135.SZChina$470M-17%-4%-2%n/a43.7%-7.5%
Jilin Yatai (Group) 600881.SSChina$776M+3%-15%-21%n/a5.0%-20.1%
Guangdong Dongpeng 003012.SZChina$779M-24%-15%0%29.8×-3.8%-3.3%
Pan-United P52.SISingapore$784M-9%+26%7%15.4×-5.3%+17.3%
Forterra FORT.LUnited Kingdom$445M+11%-5%10%16.5×6.4%+5.7%

Questions

Which companies are Marshalls's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Sinosteel Luonai Materials Technology (688119.SS), Nichiha (7943.T), Sobute New Materials (603916.SS), Stewards (SWRD), Suncrete (RMIX), Shinagawa Refra (5351.T), Longyan Kaolin Clay (605086.SS), Wagners (WGN.AX).
Is Marshalls expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 11.8× against a peer median of 24.4×, cheapest of 10 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is +2 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Marshalls stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +40.2% against -12.1% for the median peer; over one year +5.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.