Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › MI6.AX Minerals 260 LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

Minerals 260 LimitedMI6.AXCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Australia · AUD·Materials›Precious Metals

Australian gold and battery-metals explorer advancing the Bullabulling gold project near Kalgoorlie and the Moora/Julimar project area in WA.

≈ A fast-scaling Western Australian gold-and-battery-metals explorerMomentum neutral 46
Mkt cap
$1.29B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
78%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$4.79M
20-day average traded
P/B
4.68×
price to book
ROE
28.5%
delivered
Implied ROE
54.2%
what the price asks
Next earnings
118 days
4 Mar 2027
Close · AUDA$0.75
1D-8.5%
1W+1.4%
1M-10.2%
3M-1.3%
6M+0.7%
YTD+78.6%
1Y+167.9%
ATR %7.9%
52w lowhigh25.0% off high

What Minerals 260 does

Australian gold and battery-metals explorer advancing the Bullabulling gold project near Kalgoorlie and the Moora/Julimar project area in WA.

Has no mine or sales, so it funds drilling and studies from money raised from shareholders and partners; revenue would start only if a mine is built. A funding arrangement with royalty company Franco-Nevada is its route toward financing development at Bullabulling.

In one line: A fast-scaling Western Australian gold-and-battery-metals explorer.

Products and services

  • Bullabulling gold project
  • Julimar Moora (palladium-nickel-copper) project

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Precious/critical metals mining
  • Gold and PGE-nickel exploration
  • Project development

What could go right

  • Gold price strength aiding project economics
  • Franco-Nevada funding supporting Bullabulling development

What could go wrong

  • Project financing/construction risk
  • Commodity price volatility (gold, PGE, nickel)

Moat: none. Pre-production explorer/developer; value depends on resource growth and construction financing, not an operating moat.

Headquarters: Perth, Australia · Founded: 2011

Named competitors

Minerals 260 at a glance

Size Minerals 260 (MI6.AX) is an Australia Materials company (Precious Metals) with a market value of $1.29B, the 156th largest of 316 Australia companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at A$0.75 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 0.7%, against -8.2% for the median peer and +4.1% for the Australia market (cap-weighted) — 6th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Valuation It trades at 4.68× book value against a peer median of 3.08× (10th most expensive of 21).

Price implies The share price implies a return on equity of about 54.2%; Minerals 260 delivers 28.5%, so the price asks more than the business earns today.

Next results Next results expected around 4 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026MI6.AX 94Peer median 89
Six months, rebased to 100: Minerals 260 against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Minerals 260 financials

Reported figures in AUD; fiscal year ends 2026-06-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
RevenueA$0A$0A$0A$0A$0
Revenue growth—————
Gross profit-A$340,000-A$340,000-A$161,556-A$155,137-A$55,672
EBITDA-A$65.5M-A$65.5M-A$12.6M-A$8.14M-A$13.9M
Net incomeA$83.5MA$83.5M-A$11.5M-A$7.71M-A$13.1M
Free cash flow-A$61.5M-A$61.5M-A$11.5M-A$5.92M-A$6.34M
Capital expenditureA$10.1MA$10.1MA$2.97MA$101,511A$508,981
Total debtn/aA$2.88MA$510,235A$624,385A$96,756

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Minerals 260 competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%-20%-10%0%ABRAPRNIAUVZLABZOREHMMCGGDRIONUAGALK300139EQRSXGC0004090340MUXHYMCMI6.AX6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Minerals 260 is the large dot.

Fundamentals: return on equity against price-to-book

-100%-50%0%00×100×200×ABRAPRNIAU7687VZLABZOREHMMCGGDRIONUAG300139EQRSXGC000409MUXHYMCMI6.AXReturn on equity →Price / book →
A bank or insurer earning more on its equity usually trades at a higher multiple of book; points far above the trend are priced for more. Minerals 260 is the large dot.

Capital: ROE delivered against the ROE the price implies

0%200%0%200%ABRAPRNIAUBZBGLORENUAG300139HYMCMI6.AXROE delivered →ROE the price implies →
Above the diagonal = the price asks for a higher return on equity than the business earns today. Minerals 260 is the large dot.

Minerals 260 competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (MI6.AX vs CHN.AX vs VAU.AX vs CYL.AX)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROE
Minerals 260 MI6.AX$1.29B+1%n/a28%4.68×54.2%
Chalice Mining CHN.AXn/a-37%n/an/an/an/a
Vault Minerals VAU.AX$4.19B+21%+35%13%2.83×25.1%
Catalyst Metals CYL.AX$746M-28%+75%29%1.52×15.2%

How Minerals 260 compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Minerals 260 against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureMI6.AXPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-10.2%-5.0%5th lowest of 21
6-month return+0.7%-8.2%6th highest of 20
Return on equity28.5%2.7%2nd highest of 21
Price / book4.68×3.08×10th most expensive of 21
Trailing P/E19.9×22.9×6th cheapest of 12
ROE the price implies54.2%26.2%7th most demanding of 21
ROE delivered28.5%4.6%2nd highest of 18

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROEDelivered ROE
Minerals 260 MI6.AXAustralia$1.29B+1%n/a28%4.68×54.2%28.5%
AbraSilver Resource ABRA.TOCanada$1.30B-37%n/a-113%34.64×355.9%-112.6%
Perenti PRN.AXAustralia$1.31B-8%-4%5%1.07×6.9%4.5%
i-80 Gold IAU.TOCanada$1.24B-2%+38%-82%5.43×68.3%-81.9%
EACON 7687.HKHong Kong$1.23Bn/a+46%-80%9.81×25.6%n/a
Vizsla Silver VZLA.TOCanada$1.18B-1%n/a-11%2.79×24.8%n/a
Benz Mining BZ.VCanada$1.15B+120%n/a-153%22.56×218.6%-152.6%
Bellevue Gold BGL.AXAustralia$1.46B-16%+14%1%2.51×26.9%0.9%
Orezone Gold ORE.TOCanada$1.46B+31%+93%25%2.26×18.1%25.4%
Hemlo Mining HMMC.TOCanada$1.09B-9%n/a-14%1.77×14.5%n/a
Gogold Resources GGD.TOCanada$1.08B+19%+64%11%2.18×22.3%10.9%
RIO2 RIO.TOCanada$1.08B-6%n/a23%2.81×35.2%22.7%
New Pacific Metals NUAG.TOCanada$1.05B0%n/a-3%6.55×94.2%-3.3%
Alkane Resources ALK.AXAustralia$1.63B+11%+403%31%2.11×25.3%31.3%
Beijing Xiaocheng Technology Stock 300139.SZChina$1.64B-25%+39%12%9.54×93.2%12.5%
EQ Resources EQR.AXAustralia$1.01B+6%+150%7%9.28×35.7%7.5%
Southern Cross Gold Consolidated SXGC.TOCanada$1.65B-9%n/a-4%8.80×32.9%-3.5%
Yunding Technology 000409.SZChina$960M-18%+6%5%3.35×21.0%4.6%
Tongguan Gold 0340.HKHong Kong$1.73B-14%+65%26%2.77×11.8%25.5%
McEwen MUX.TOCanada$954M-31%+54%14%1.31×17.6%13.5%
Hycroft Mining HYMCUnited States$1.75B-51%n/a-72%7.36×123.4%-72.3%

Questions

Who are Minerals 260's main competitors?
Named competitors: Chalice Mining (CHN.AX), Vault Minerals (VAU.AX), Catalyst Metals (CYL.AX). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes AbraSilver Resource (ABRA.TO), Perenti (PRN.AX), i-80 Gold (IAU.TO), EACON (7687.HK), Vizsla Silver (VZLA.TO), Benz Mining (BZ.V).
Is Minerals 260 expensive compared with its peers?
On price / book it trades at 4.68× against a peer median of 3.08×, 10th most expensive of 21 in its peer set. The share price implies a return on equity of about 54.2%; Minerals 260 delivers 28.5%, so the price asks more than the business earns today.
How has Minerals 260 stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +0.7% against -8.2% for the median peer; over one year +167.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.