Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › LUND-B.ST L E Lundbergforetagen AB Class BOpen in the cockpit ↗

L E Lundbergforetagen AB Class BLUND-B.STCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Sweden · SEK·Financials›Financial Conglomerates

Fredrik Lundberg's Swedish investment company holding stakes in Holmen, Industrivarden, Handelsbanken and its own real estate arm.

≈ A Swedish diversified holding companyMomentum strong 63
Mkt cap
$15.3B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
48%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$6.38M
20-day average traded
P/B
1.04×
price to book
ROE
14.2%
delivered
Implied ROE
8.4%
what the price asks
Close · SEKSEK 603.50
1D-0.3%
1W+3.7%
1M+7.5%
3M+5.3%
6M+15.5%
YTD+18.0%
1Y+19.6%
ATR %1.6%
52w lowhigh1.5% off high

What L E Lundbergforetagen does

Fredrik Lundberg's Swedish investment company holding stakes in Holmen, Industrivarden, Handelsbanken and its own real estate arm.

Income is dividends from its listed holdings plus rent from its own property company, with the value of its holdings tracking the Swedish stock market. Fredrik Lundberg and family control it through high-vote shares; these Class B shares carry fewer votes.

In one line: A Swedish diversified holding company.

Products and services

  • Industrivarden stake
  • Holmen stake
  • Handelsbanken stake
  • Fastighets AB L E Lundberg (real estate)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Financial holding
  • Diversified investment holding company
  • Listed equity stakes + wholly-owned…

What could go right

  • Performance of underlying blue-chip holdings
  • Real estate portfolio rental growth

What could go wrong

  • Holding-company discount
  • Concentration in Swedish equities/real estate

Moat: narrow (scale). A well-regarded long-term capital allocator; value depends on quality of underlying holdings, not an operating moat.

Headquarters: Stockholm, Sweden · Founded: 1944 · Employees: 4,498

Named competitors

L E Lundbergforetagen at a glance

Size L E Lundbergforetagen (LUND-B.ST) is a Sweden Financials company (Financial Conglomerates) with a market value of $15.3B, the 21st largest of 221 Sweden companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at SEK 603.50 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 15.5%, against +1.4% for the median peer and +8.2% for the Sweden market (cap-weighted) — 3rd highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 3.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.2%); the operating margin is 28.5% (peer median 40.3%).

Valuation It trades at 1.04× book value against a peer median of 1.18× (9th cheapest of 21).

Price implies The share price implies a return on equity of about 8.4%; L E Lundbergforetagen delivers 14.2%, so the price asks less than the business earns today.

Relative performance

10011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026LUND-B.ST 117Peer median 102
Six months, rebased to 100: L E Lundbergforetagen against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

L E Lundbergforetagen financials

Reported figures in SEK; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueSEK 28.8BSEK 30.8BSEK 31.4BSEK 30.6BSEK 31.9B
Revenue growth—-2%+2%-4%—
Gross profitSEK 6.88BSEK 10.7BSEK 10.4BSEK 12.1BSEK 12.8B
EBITDASEK 9.71BSEK 8.87BSEK 8.99BSEK 9.96BSEK 11.8B
Net incomeSEK 18.5BSEK 12.1BSEK 6.30BSEK 7.25BSEK 1.51B
Free cash flowSEK 6.89BSEK 6.28BSEK 5.71BSEK 8.40BSEK 7.52B
Capital expenditureSEK 1.49BSEK 2.00BSEK 1.98BSEK 1.61BSEK 1.28B
Total debtSEK 25.6BSEK 24.6BSEK 20.6BSEK 19.7BSEK 20.8B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

L E Lundbergforetagen competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%-20%0%+20%JIOFINLATO-BARCCBAERHALBAJAJHLDNGSOLBMNR8473EXOAKER2887BBUCONEXAZMLUND-B.ST6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. L E Lundbergforetagen is the large dot.

Fundamentals: return on equity against price-to-book

-20%0%20%10×20×30×JIOFINLATO-BARCCBAERHALBAJAJHLDNGSOLBMNR8473001248MNGINDU-AEXOAKER2887BBUCONEXAZMLUND-B.STReturn on equity →Price / book →
A bank or insurer earning more on its equity usually trades at a higher multiple of book; points far above the trend are priced for more. L E Lundbergforetagen is the large dot.

Capital: ROE delivered against the ROE the price implies

-150%-100%-50%0%50%-100%0%JIOFINLATO-BARCCBMNR8473MNGEXOAKERBBUCAZMLUND-B.STROE delivered →ROE the price implies →
Above the diagonal = the price asks for a higher return on equity than the business earns today. L E Lundbergforetagen is the large dot.

L E Lundbergforetagen competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (LUND-B.ST vs LATO-B.ST vs INDU-A.ST vs INVE-A.ST)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROE
L E Lundbergforetagen LUND-B.ST$15.3B+16%-4%14%1.04×8.4%
Investment AB Latour LATO-B.ST$14.2B+19%+3%17%3.22×27.0%
Industrivarden INDU-A.ST$23.4B+9%-1%27%1.03×9.4%
Investor INVE-A.ST$133B+16%+2%21%1.17×9.0%

How L E Lundbergforetagen compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

L E Lundbergforetagen against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureLUND-B.STPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+7.5%+4.1%4th highest of 21
6-month return+15.5%+1.4%3rd highest of 20
Return on equity14.2%11.1%10th highest of 21
Price / book1.04×1.18×9th cheapest of 21
Trailing P/E8.1×12.0×5th cheapest of 17
ROE the price implies8.4%9.2%9th least demanding of 21
ROE delivered14.2%13.1%10th highest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROEDelivered ROE
L E Lundbergforetagen LUND-B.STSweden$15.3B+16%-4%14%1.04×8.4%14.2%
Jio Financial Services JIOFIN.NSIndia$16.2B-8%+117%1%1.18×19.7%1.3%
Investment AB Latour LATO-B.STSweden$14.2B+19%+3%17%3.22×27.0%16.8%
Ares Capital ARCCUnited States$13.8B+1%-8%6%0.99×8.1%6.2%
Julius Baer Gruppe BAER.SWSwitzerland$17.1B+2%0%16%1.89×8.8%16.2%
HAL Trust HAL.ASNetherlands$17.2B+1%-5%9%0.94×6.4%9.1%
Bajaj Holdings & Investment BAJAJHLDNG.NSIndia$13.0B+4%-14%13%1.67×20.7%13.1%
Washington H. Soul Pattinson and SOL.AXAustralia$12.5B+12%+143%20%1.42×8.9%19.8%
BitMine Immersion Technologies BMNRUnited States$11.3B-15%+1,022%-151%0.94×15.1%-151.2%
SBI 8473.TJapan$11.2B-13%+20%28%0.91×8.0%28.4%
China Resources New Energy 001248.SZChina$21.5Bn/a0%7%1.20×3.7%n/a
M&G MNG.LUnited Kingdom$10.3B+7%+68%-4%2.91×32.8%-3.8%
Industrivarden INDU-A.STSweden$23.4B+9%-1%27%1.03×9.4%27.2%
Exor EXO.ASNetherlands$26.2B+10%+59%-13%0.46×4.6%-12.6%
Aker AKER.OLNorway$8.60B-7%-17%50%1.18×11.7%50.3%
Ts Financial 2887.TWTaiwan$29.2B+62%+200%15%1.38×5.9%15.3%
Brookfield Business BBUC.TOCanada$6.15B-9%+106%-24%1.11×11.6%-23.5%
Onex ONEX.TOCanada$5.91B-7%+2%5%0.60×6.5%5.2%
Azimut AZM.MIItaly$5.70B-1%+17%28%2.62×24.8%28.5%
Blue Owl Capital OBDCUnited States$5.39B-4%+1%4%0.77×7.1%3.9%
Main Street Capital MAINUnited States$5.33B+6%+3%15%1.68×12.3%14.9%

Questions

Who are L E Lundbergforetagen's main competitors?
Named competitors: Investment AB Latour (LATO-B.ST), Industrivarden (INDU-A.ST), Investor AB (INVE-A.ST). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Jio Financial Services (JIOFIN.NS), Investment AB Latour (LATO-B.ST), Ares Capital (ARCC), Julius Baer Gruppe (BAER.SW), HAL Trust (HAL.AS), Bajaj Holdings & Investment (BAJAJHLDNG.NS).
Is L E Lundbergforetagen expensive compared with its peers?
On price / book it trades at 1.04× against a peer median of 1.18×, 9th cheapest of 21 in its peer set. The share price implies a return on equity of about 8.4%; L E Lundbergforetagen delivers 14.2%, so the price asks less than the business earns today.
How has L E Lundbergforetagen stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +15.5% against +1.4% for the median peer; over one year +19.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.