Loading…

Knife River CorporationKNFCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Materials›Construction Materials

US producer of aggregates, ready-mix concrete and asphalt, spun off from MDU Resources in 2023.

Momentum weak 26
Mkt cap
$3.20B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$42.1M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
23.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+0.4 pp
WACC 6.8%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
104 days
18 Feb 2027
Close · USD$56.40
1D-1.5%
1W-1.9%
1M+7.9%
3M-16.5%
6M-37.6%
YTD-19.8%
1Y-21.9%
ATR %5.1%
Beta1.45
52w lowhigh41.4% off high

What Knife River does

US producer of aggregates, ready-mix concrete and asphalt, spun off from MDU Resources in 2023.

Sells aggregates and ready-mix at local plants to public road and building projects; because heavy rock is costly to move, each quarry serves a local radius. Summer weather and public highway budgets drive volume. It was spun off from MDU Resources in 2023.

Products and services

  • Aggregates
  • Ready-mix concrete
  • Asphalt
  • Paving/construction services

Customers

  • State and local DOTs
  • Commercial developers
  • Residential builders

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Construction materials
  • Aggregates and ready-mix
  • Paving and construction services

What could go right

  • Infrastructure bill spending
  • Western US population growth

What could go wrong

  • Weather/seasonality
  • Construction cycle exposure

Moat: narrow (scale, distribution). Local quarry and plant networks give a transport-cost advantage in aggregates-heavy western/central US markets.

Headquarters: Bismarck, North Dakota, US · Founded: 2023 · Employees: 5,298

Named competitors

Knife River at a glance

Size Knife River (KNF) is a United States Materials company (Construction Materials) with a market value of $3.20B, the 1500th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $56.40 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 37.6%, against -11.6% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 10.9% over the last twelve months (peer median -0.9%); the operating margin is 8.6% (peer median 11.6%).

Valuation It trades at 23.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 12.8× (3rd most expensive of 18).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.4 points above its cost of capital (6.8% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $857M at 30 Sep 2026, down 14% on a year earlier — 0.3 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Short interest Short interest is 7.5% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 18 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 91KNF 66
Six months, rebased to 100: Knife River against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Knife River financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$3.38B$3.15B$2.90B$2.83B$2.53B
Revenue growth—+9%+2%+12%—
Gross profit$593M$577M$570M$539M$361M
EBITDA$504M$500M$453M$426M$326M
Net income$135M$157M$202M$183M$116M
Free cash flow-$9.51M-$69.6M$150M$195M$28.5M
Capital expenditure$266M$348M$172M$124M$178M
Total debt$1.60B$1.22B$727M$726M$731M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Knife River competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-10%0%+10%+20%VCT5233USLM0008773323600516CEM1102NK000786FLSTTAM002192000935SRC0006722009EXP600720KNF6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Knife River is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%-10%0%+10%+20%0×100×200×VCT5233USLM3323600516CEMCMO1102FLSTTAM000935000672KNFRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Knife River is the large dot.

Knife River competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (KNF vs MLM vs VMC vs CRH)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Knife River KNF$3.20B-38%+11%9%23.1×n/a
Martin Marietta Materials MLM$36.8B-12%+9%20%28.8×23.2%
Vulcan Materials VMC$36.3B0%+2%21%29.5×18.7%
CRH CRH$63.1B-16%+6%14%16.0×11.0%

How Knife River compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Knife River against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureKNFPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+7.9%+1.6%7th highest of 21
6-month return-37.6%-11.6%3rd lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-41.4%-30.9%8th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+10.9%-0.9%4th highest of 21
Operating margin8.6%11.6%8th lowest of 21
Forward P/E23.1×12.8×3rd most expensive of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital+0.4 pp-1.6 pp8th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA9.2×9.2×7th cheapest of 13
Net debt / EBITDA2.8×1.8×3rd most indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Knife River KNFUnited States$3.20B-38%+11%9%23.1×n/an/a
Vicat VCT.PAFrance$3.29B+6%+5%11%10.2×0.2%+6.6%
Taiheiyo Cement 5233.TJapan$3.03B+19%+1%8%7.7×0.8%+0.8%
United States Lime & Minerals USLMUnited States$3.39B+7%+4%41%19.6×5.1%+18.3%
Tianshan Material 000877.SZChina$3.47B-30%-17%-13%n/a5.6%-14.5%
China National Building Material 3323.HKHong Kong$2.76B-51%0%2%25.2×25.1%-7.7%
FangDa Carbon New Material 600516.SSChina$2.74B-20%+17%-4%226.5×n/an/a
Cementir CEM.MIItaly$2.70B+5%-2%13%12.8×4.3%+6.0%
Cementos Molins CMO.MCSpain$2.70Bn/a+14%12%13.6×8.9%+12.5%
Asia Cement 1102.TWTaiwan$3.92B+5%-10%10%11.0×5.6%-1.9%
Imerys NK.PAFrance$2.41B+11%-2%6%15.4×7.4%-2.3%
Beijing New Building Materials (Group) 000786.SZChina$4.41B-33%-3%10%11.4×-2.3%+8.4%
FLSmidth & Co. A/S FLS.CODenmark$4.88B+22%-20%13%13.9×2.8%-2.3%
Titan America TTAMUnited States$2.08B-32%+5%15%10.5×1.0%+6.9%
YOUNGY 002192.SZChina$2.03B-52%+315%60%n/a4.9%+16.8%
Sichuan Hexie Shuangma 000935.SZChina$1.98B-35%-14%15%13.8×n/an/a
SigmaRoc SRC.LUnited Kingdom$1.95B+14%+4%15%12.1×12.4%+52.8%
Gansu Shangfeng Materials 000672.SZChina$1.88B-6%-23%7%4.5×10.2%-6.1%
BBMG 2009.HKHong Kong$1.87B-20%-22%-4%n/a42.3%-4.0%
Eagle Materials EXPUnited States$5.71B-12%+2%22%16.1×9.7%+7.3%
CCCC Design And Consulting 600720.SSChina$1.73B-24%-10%12%9.7×n/an/a

Knife River backlog

Knife River reported $857M of remaining performance obligations at 30 Sep 2026, down 14% from a year earlier and down 29% from the previous quarter. That is 0.3 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: 0.73.

Questions

Who are Knife River's main competitors?
Named competitors: Martin Marietta Materials (MLM), Vulcan Materials (VMC), Summit Materials (private or unlisted), CRH plc (CRH). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Vicat (VCT.PA), Taiheiyo Cement (5233.T), United States Lime & Minerals (USLM), Tianshan Material (000877.SZ), China National Building Material (3323.HK), FangDa Carbon New Material (600516.SS).
Is Knife River expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 23.1× against a peer median of 12.8×, 3rd most expensive of 18 in its peer set.
How has Knife River stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -37.6% against -11.6% for the median peer; over one year -21.9%.
What is Knife River's backlog?
Knife River's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $857M at 30 Sep 2026, -14% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.