Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › FLS.CO FLSmidth & Co. A/SOpen in the cockpit ↗

FLSmidth & Co. A/SFLS.COCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Denmark · DKK·Materials›Construction Materials

Supplies processing equipment, plants and services to the global cement and mining industries.

Momentum strong 63
Mkt cap
$4.88B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
76%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$10.0M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
13.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+6.4 pp
WACC 5.8%
Hurdle
+5 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
5 days
11 Nov 2026
Close · DKKDKK 558.00
1D-0.2%
1W-4.2%
1M+2.1%
3M+9.7%
6M+22.3%
YTD+25.4%
1Y+15.2%
ATR %3.1%
52w lowhigh9.9% off high

What FLSmidth & Co. A/S does

Supplies processing equipment, plants and services to the global cement and mining industries.

Sells large plants and equipment under contracts booked as orders, then earns more over the years from spare parts and servicing for the installed machines. It has been narrowing its focus toward mining and reducing its cement exposure. Mining customers' investment budgets drive new equipment orders.

Products and services

  • Mining equipment (crushing, grinding, flotation)
  • Cement plant equipment
  • Aftermarket parts and services

Customers

  • Mining companies (global)
  • Cement producers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Mining/cement equipment
  • Equipment + aftermarket services

What could go right

  • Mining capex cycle (critical minerals demand)
  • Growing aftermarket/service revenue mix

What could go wrong

  • Mining/cement capex cyclicality
  • Divestiture of cement division narrows focus/scale

Moat: narrow (installed base, switching costs, process know-how). Large installed equipment base drives high-margin, recurring aftermarket parts and service revenue.

Headquarters: Copenhagen, Denmark · Founded: 1882 · Employees: 5,494

Named competitors

FLSmidth & Co. A/S at a glance

Size FLSmidth & Co. A/S (FLS.CO) is a Denmark Materials company (Construction Materials) with a market value of $4.88B, the 23rd largest of 59 Denmark companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at DKK 558.00 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 22.3%, against -9.4% for the median peer and +8.8% for the Denmark market (cap-weighted) — highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 20.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +1.4%); the operating margin is 13.4% (peer median 11.6%).

Valuation It trades at 13.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.7× (9th most expensive of 19).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -2%, so the hurdle is +5 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 6.4 points above its cost of capital (5.8% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 11 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026FLS.CO 123Peer median 95
Six months, rebased to 100: FLSmidth & Co. A/S against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

FLSmidth & Co. A/S financials

Reported figures in DKK; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueDKK 14.7BDKK 14.6BDKK 15.7BDKK 24.1BDKK 21.8B
Revenue growth—-7%-35%+10%—
Gross profitDKK 4.71BDKK 4.66BDKK 4.65BDKK 5.74BDKK 4.56B
EBITDADKK 2.54BDKK 2.23BDKK 1.73BDKK 1.43BDKK 1.14B
Net incomeDKK 1.54BDKK 175MDKK 990MDKK 497MDKK 370M
Free cash flowDKK 249MDKK 604MDKK 256MDKK 456MDKK 880M
Capital expenditureDKK 351MDKK 585MDKK 698MDKK 499MDKK 333M
Total debtDKK 2.84BDKK 2.57BDKK 1.77BDKK 1.92BDKK 2.87B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

FLSmidth & Co. A/S competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-10%0%+10%+20%000786EXP11021101ROCK-A0008776655USLMVCTKNF5233BZU3323600516NKTTAM002192000935FLS.CO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. FLSmidth & Co. A/S is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%-10%0%+10%+20%0×100×200×000786EXP11021101ROCK-A6655USLMVCTKNF3323600516CMO000935FLS.CORevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. FLSmidth & Co. A/S is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%0%20%000786EXP11021101ROCK-A0008776655USLMVCT5233BZU3323CMONK002192FLS.COGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. FLSmidth & Co. A/S is the large dot.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (FLS.CO vs METSO.HE vs SAND.ST vs WEIR.L)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
FLSmidth & Co. A/S FLS.CO$4.88B+22%-20%13%13.9×2.8%
Metso METSO.HE$15.8B+14%+8%15%23.6×15.3%
Sandvik SAND.ST$45.8B-1%+14%20%21.0×13.3%
Weir WEIR.L$8.18B-3%+6%18%18.1×19.3%

How FLSmidth & Co. A/S compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureFLS.COPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+2.1%+7.5%8th lowest of 21
6-month return+22.3%-9.4%highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-9.9%-23.4%4th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-20.3%+1.4%lowest of 21
Operating margin13.4%11.6%8th highest of 21
Forward P/E13.9×13.7×9th most expensive of 19
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)2.8%4.9%8th least demanding of 18
Growth delivered (Del g)-2.3%+6.9%3rd lowest of 18
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+5.1 pp-3.6 pp5th most demanding of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital+6.4 pp-1.3 pp4th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA13.6×8.4×5th most expensive of 15
Net debt / EBITDA0.9×2.0×5th least indebted of 15

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
FLSmidth & Co. A/S FLS.CODenmark$4.88B+22%-20%13%13.9×2.8%-2.3%
Beijing New Building Materials (Group) 000786.SZChina$4.41B-33%-3%10%11.4×-2.3%+8.4%
Eagle Materials EXPUnited States$5.71B-12%+2%22%16.1×9.7%+7.3%
Asia Cement 1102.TWTaiwan$3.92B+5%-10%10%11.0×5.6%-1.9%
TCC 1101.TWTaiwan$6.09B+11%-6%8%29.2×9.1%+7.2%
ROCKWOOL A/S ROCK-A.CODenmark$6.72B+11%-1%13%16.2×-4.8%+8.3%
Tianshan Material 000877.SZChina$3.47B-30%-17%-13%n/a5.6%-14.5%
Huaxin Building Materials 6655.HKHong Kong$6.91B+9%+22%18%8.1×-7.8%+3.0%
United States Lime & Minerals USLMUnited States$3.39B+7%+4%41%19.6×5.1%+18.3%
Vicat VCT.PAFrance$3.29B+6%+5%11%10.2×0.2%+6.6%
Knife River KNFUnited States$3.20B-38%+11%9%23.1×n/an/a
Taiheiyo Cement 5233.TJapan$3.03B+19%+1%8%7.7×0.8%+0.8%
Buzzi BZU.MIItaly$8.04B-9%+2%18%9.3×2.8%+7.0%
China National Building Material 3323.HKHong Kong$2.76B-51%0%2%25.2×25.1%-7.7%
FangDa Carbon New Material 600516.SSChina$2.74B-20%+17%-4%226.5×n/an/a
Cementir CEM.MIItaly$2.70B+5%-2%13%12.8×4.3%+6.0%
Cementos Molins CMO.MCSpain$2.70Bn/a+14%12%13.6×8.9%+12.5%
Imerys NK.PAFrance$2.41B+11%-2%6%15.4×7.4%-2.3%
Titan America TTAMUnited States$2.08B-32%+5%15%10.5×1.0%+6.9%
YOUNGY 002192.SZChina$2.03B-52%+315%60%n/a4.9%+16.8%
Sichuan Hexie Shuangma 000935.SZChina$1.98B-35%-14%15%13.8×n/an/a

Questions

Who are FLSmidth & Co. A/S's main competitors?
Named competitors: Metso (METSO.HE), Sandvik (SAND.ST), Weir Group (WEIR.L). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Beijing New Building Materials (Group) (000786.SZ), Eagle Materials (EXP), Asia Cement (1102.TW), TCC (1101.TW), ROCKWOOL A/S (ROCK-A.CO), Tianshan Material (000877.SZ).
Is FLSmidth & Co. A/S expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 13.9× against a peer median of 13.7×, 9th most expensive of 19 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -2%, so the hurdle is +5 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has FLSmidth & Co. A/S stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +22.3% against -9.4% for the median peer; over one year +15.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.