Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › IFP.TO Interfor CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Interfor CorporationIFP.TOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Canada · CAD·Materials›Forest Products
Momentum leader 86
Mkt cap
$634M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$1.94M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
59.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-7.6 pp
WACC 8.5%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
90 days
4 Feb 2027
Close · CADC$13.52
1D-8.2%
1W-1.1%
1M+4.0%
3M-4.2%
6M+42.3%
YTD+57.9%
1Y+72.0%
ATR %5.6%
52w lowhigh14.1% off high

What Interfor does

Employees: 2,200

Interfor at a glance

Size Interfor (IFP.TO) is a Canada Materials company (Forest Products) with a market value of $634M, the 312th largest of 420 Canada companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at C$13.52 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 42.3%, against -12.0% for the median peer and +5.2% for the Canada market (cap-weighted) — highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 7.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +2.5%); the operating margin is 0.9% (peer median 5.3%).

Valuation It trades at 59.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 27.1× (3rd most expensive of 11).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 7.6 points below its cost of capital (8.5% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 4 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

7510012515011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026IFP.TO 143Peer median 87
Six months, rebased to 100: Interfor against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Interfor financials

Reported figures in CAD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueC$2.74BC$2.81BC$3.02BC$3.32BC$4.58B
Revenue growth—-7%-9%-28%—
Gross profitC$92.3MC$1.80M-C$108M-C$72.8MC$1.01B
EBITDAC$199MC$127MC$52.8MC$82.3MC$1.14B
Net income-C$383M-C$344M-C$304M-C$267MC$598M
Free cash flow-C$85.2M-C$92.1MC$20.2M-C$119MC$427M
Capital expenditureC$102MC$90.3MC$74.1MC$199MC$309M
Total debtC$895MC$874MC$951MC$938MC$833M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Interfor competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%603216301356STYLAMINDGREENLAM5930603038600189000910RESPONIND002785002631001211301588301227601996INWI002679600265CFPIFP.TO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Interfor is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%0×50×100×603216301356STYLAMINDGREENLAM6001890009100027856019961377INWIIFP.TORevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Interfor is the large dot.

Interfor competitors and peer comparison

How Interfor compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Interfor against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureIFP.TOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+4.0%-12.4%3rd highest of 21
6-month return+42.3%-12.0%highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-14.1%-40.4%4th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-7.4%+2.5%6th lowest of 21
Operating margin0.9%5.3%9th lowest of 21
Forward P/E59.2×27.1×3rd most expensive of 11
ROIC minus cost of capital-7.6 pp-4.4 pp8th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA8.8×14.4×3rd cheapest of 10
Net debt / EBITDA4.3×0.9×most indebted of 10

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Interfor IFP.TOCanada$634M+42%-7%1%59.2×n/an/a
Mengtian Home 603216.SSChina$607M-39%-5%3%62.7×39.4%-2.6%
Zhejiang Tianzhen Technology 301356.SZChina$713M-7%+2%4%26.0×27.5%-7.1%
Stylam Industries STYLAMIND.NSIndia$563M+19%+10%18%28.1×n/an/a
Greenlam Industries GREENLAM.NSIndia$550M-11%+20%7%34.9×28.3%+20.7%
Bunka Shutter 5930.TJapan$779M-1%+3%6%n/a-12.9%+6.4%
Dongguan HuaLi Industries 603038.SSChina$498M-27%+15%6%n/a20.6%+7.5%
Jilin Quanyangquan 600189.SSChina$897M+1%+9%11%109.0×16.6%-1.7%
Dare Power Dekor Home 000910.SZChina$414M-26%-4%-9%7.4×n/an/a
Responsive Industries RESPONIND.NSIndia$391M-24%-13%10%n/a42.5%+13.0%
XIAMEN WANLI STONE STOCK 002785.SZChina$1.03B-40%-33%-7%47.6×n/an/a
Der Future Science & Technology 002631.SZChina$1.04B+10%-26%-23%n/an/an/a
Suncha Technology 001211.SZChina$387M-14%+18%0%n/an/an/a
Newtechwood 301588.SZChina$376M-39%+20%7%n/an/an/a
Harbin Sayyas Windows 301227.SZChina$368M-13%-10%-21%n/a33.7%-6.0%
Guangxi Fenglin Wood Industry 601996.SSChina$360M-21%-7%-12%17.8×n/an/a
Sakata Seed 1377.TJapan$1.13B+2%+12%11%16.2×0.2%+8.5%
Inwido INWI.STSweden$1.16B+39%+11%10%16.9×2.5%+6.1%
Fujian Jinsen Forestry 002679.SZChina$343M-11%+4%10%n/a43.6%+0.2%
Yunnan Jinggu Forestry 600265.SSChina$338M-21%-45%-13%n/an/an/a
Canfor CFP.TOCanada$1.22B+17%+2%-1%n/an/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Interfor's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Mengtian Home (603216.SS), Zhejiang Tianzhen Technology (301356.SZ), Stylam Industries (STYLAMIND.NS), Greenlam Industries (GREENLAM.NS), Bunka Shutter (5930.T), Dongguan HuaLi Industries (603038.SS), Jilin Quanyangquan (600189.SS), Dare Power Dekor Home (000910.SZ).
Is Interfor expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 59.2× against a peer median of 27.1×, 3rd most expensive of 11 in its peer set.
How has Interfor stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +42.3% against -12.0% for the median peer; over one year +72.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.