Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › GRK.HE GRK Infra PlcOpen in the cockpit ↗

GRK Infra PlcGRK.HECompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Finland · EUR·Industrials›Engineering & Construction

Finnish infrastructure construction company providing road paving, earthworks and civil engineering services.

Momentum neutral 41
Mkt cap
$903M
US dollars, full cap
$/day
$2.16M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
10.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+53.1 pp
WACC 8.7%
Hurdle
-26 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
104 days
18 Feb 2027
Close · EUR€18.86
1D-3.8%
1W-3.4%
1M-27.6%
3M-11.0%
6M+30.1%
YTD+31.5%
1Y+43.4%
ATR %5.8%
52w lowhigh32.4% off high

What GRK Infra does

Finnish infrastructure construction company providing road paving, earthworks and civil engineering services.

Products and services

  • Road paving/asphalt
  • Earthworks
  • Infrastructure maintenance

Customers

  • Finnish municipalities and government road agencie
  • Private construction developers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Infrastructure construction
  • Paving, earthworks and civil…

What could go right

  • Finnish infrastructure investment/road maintenance budgets

What could go wrong

  • Public tender/contract cyclicality
  • Input-cost inflation (bitumen, aggregates)

Moat: narrow (installed base, process know-how). Established local paving/earthworks capacity and equipment fleet built up over decades of contracts.

Headquarters: Helsinki, Finland · Employees: 1,222

Named competitors

GRK Infra at a glance

Size GRK Infra (GRK.HE) is a Finland Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $903M, the 37th largest of 65 Finland companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at €18.86 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 30.1%, against -5.3% for the median peer and -2.9% for the Finland market (cap-weighted) — 5th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 6.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.9%); the operating margin is 8.5% (peer median 5.5%).

Valuation It trades at 10.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.5× (2nd cheapest of 15).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +25%, so the hurdle is -26 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 53.1 points above its cost of capital (8.7% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 18 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026GRK.HE 131Peer median 92
Six months, rebased to 100: GRK Infra against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

GRK Infra financials

Reported figures in EUR; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue€818M€872M€729M€546M€450M
Revenue growth—+20%+33%+21%—
Gross profit€100M€87.3M€77.1M€44.6M€18.7M
EBITDA€95.1M€65.4M€60.6M€37.0M€22.1M
Net income€53.9M€43.0M€36.9M€20.1M€6.98M
Free cash flow€19.9M€143M€45.1M€62.3M€1.88M
Capital expenditure€22.2M€15.1M€16.6M€13.8M€19.1M
Total debt€40.2M€37.6M€38.7M€37.8M€38.2M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

GRK Infra competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%+50%-20%0%+20%ICOP1968605598GNGCOST600035601789060370SNTIA000090GFRD1926YITKEC300983NXT605178002307002811603257GRK.HE6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. GRK Infra is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%+150%0×200×400×ICOP1968605598GNGCOST060370NXT603257GRK.HERevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. GRK Infra is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%0%20%GNGCOSTSNTIA000090GFRD1926YIT002811603257GRK.HEGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. GRK Infra is the large dot.

GRK Infra competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (GRK.HE vs NCC-A.ST vs YIT.HE)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
GRK Infra GRK.HE$903M+30%-7%8%10.0×-1.5%
NCC NCC-A.ST$1.69B-3%-17%3%22.2×-1.6%
YIT YIT.HE$938M+45%+10%3%75.2×12.8%

How GRK Infra compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

GRK Infra against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureGRK.HEPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-27.6%-6.6%lowest of 21
6-month return+30.1%-5.3%5th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-32.4%-26.5%10th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-6.7%+8.9%4th lowest of 21
Operating margin8.5%5.5%9th highest of 21
Forward P/E10.0×15.5×2nd cheapest of 15
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-1.5%9.1%3rd least demanding of 10
Growth delivered (Del g)+24.6%+4.7%highest of 10
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-26.1 pp+8.1 ppleast demanding of 10
ROIC minus cost of capital+53.1 pp-2.1 pphighest of 18
EV / EBITDA6.9×9.0×2nd cheapest of 9
Net debt / EBITDA-1.6×-0.9×4th least indebted of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
GRK Infra GRK.HEFinland$903M+30%-7%8%10.0×-1.5%+24.6%
I.CO.P ICOP.MIItaly$901M-6%+138%11%17.1×n/an/a
Taihei Dengyo Kaisha 1968.TJapan$899M-22%+19%11%11.2×n/an/a
Shanghai Geoharbour Construction 605598.SSChina$913M-48%+9%-3%541.7×n/an/a
GR Engineering Services GNG.AXAustralia$891M+40%+3%11%18.3×14.9%+4.7%
Costain COST.LUnited Kingdom$890M+30%-6%5%16.5×0.1%+1.3%
Hubei Chutian Smart Communication 600035.SSChina$918M-1%+34%9%n/an/an/a
Ningbo Construction 601789.SSChina$885M-34%+10%2%n/an/an/a
LS Marine Solution 060370.KSSouth Korea$924M-35%+21%6%55.0×n/an/a
Sentia SNTIA.OLNorway$924M+8%+15%5%14.3×-11.1%+4.2%
Shenzhen Tagen 000090.SZChina$883M-11%+1%0%7.7×13.8%+5.6%
Galliford Try GFRD.LUnited Kingdom$925M+31%+3%3%14.5×-0.8%+11.4%
Raito Kogyo 1926.TJapan$928M-5%+9%13%11.6×-8.0%+5.2%
YIT YIT.HEFinland$938M+45%+10%3%75.2×12.8%-10.6%
KEC International KEC.NSIndia$939M-46%-2%5%13.3×n/an/a
Shanghai Urban Architecture Design 300983.SZChina$866M+5%-7%-58%n/an/an/a
Next Geosolutions Europe NXT.MIItaly$861M+22%+68%17%12.7×n/an/a
Beijing New Space Technology 605178.SSChina$861M-18%0%-51%n/an/an/a
Xinjiang Beixin Road & Bridge 002307.SZChina$861M-19%-22%8%n/an/an/a
Shenzhen Cheng Chung Design 002811.SZChina$949M+48%+28%13%n/a9.1%-6.2%
China Nerin Engineering 603257.SSChina$851M-21%-21%10%23.4×15.4%+5.6%

Questions

Who are GRK Infra's main competitors?
Named competitors: NCC (NCC-A.ST), YIT (YIT.HE). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes I.CO.P (ICOP.MI), Taihei Dengyo Kaisha (1968.T), Shanghai Geoharbour Construction (605598.SS), GR Engineering Services (GNG.AX), Costain (COST.L), Hubei Chutian Smart Communication (600035.SS).
Is GRK Infra expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 10.0× against a peer median of 15.5×, 2nd cheapest of 15 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +25%, so the hurdle is -26 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has GRK Infra stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +30.1% against -5.3% for the median peer; over one year +43.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.