Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 605598.SS Shanghai Geoharbour Construction Group Co. Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Shanghai Geoharbour Construction Group Co. Ltd. Class A605598.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Industrials›Engineering & Construction
Momentum weak 38
Mkt cap
$913M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
26%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$24.8M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
541.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-4.3 pp
WACC 6.3%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
168 days
23 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥25.28
1D-1.4%
1W-3.3%
1M+6.0%
3M-4.0%
6M-47.7%
YTD-63.6%
1Y-9.6%
ATR %6.0%
52w lowhigh67.3% off high

What Shanghai Geoharbour Construction does

Employees: 1,216

Shanghai Geoharbour Construction at a glance

Size Shanghai Geoharbour Construction (605598.SS) is a China Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $913M, the 2485th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥25.28 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 47.7%, against -2.9% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 8.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.1%); the operating margin is -2.5% (peer median 5.5%).

Valuation It trades at 541.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.4× (most expensive of 15).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.3 points below its cost of capital (6.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 23 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

507510012511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 96605598.SS 51
Six months, rebased to 100: Shanghai Geoharbour Construction against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Shanghai Geoharbour Construction financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥1.61BCN¥1.57BCN¥1.30BCN¥1.28BCN¥885M
Revenue growth—+21%+2%+44%—
Gross profitCN¥305MCN¥310MCN¥351MCN¥407MCN¥292M
EBITDAn/aCN¥185MCN¥164MCN¥257MCN¥220M
Net income-CN¥76.9MCN¥65.6MCN¥92.5MCN¥174MCN¥157M
Free cash flow-CN¥5.28MCN¥60.5M-CN¥294MCN¥63.9MCN¥62.2M
Capital expenditureCN¥88.0MCN¥93.2MCN¥216MCN¥77.7MCN¥75.8M
Total debtCN¥11.3MCN¥36.3MCN¥69.6MCN¥56.4MCN¥22.3M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Shanghai Geoharbour Construction competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%+50%-20%0%+20%600035GRK060370SNTIAGFRDICOP19681926GNGCOSTYITKEC601789000090002811300983300284NXT605178002307605598.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Shanghai Geoharbour Construction is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%0×200×400×GRK060370SNTIAGFRDICOP1968300284NXT605598.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Shanghai Geoharbour Construction is the large dot.

Shanghai Geoharbour Construction competitors and peer comparison

How Shanghai Geoharbour Construction compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Shanghai Geoharbour Construction against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure605598.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+6.0%-6.6%3rd highest of 21
6-month return-47.7%-2.9%lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-67.3%-26.5%lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+8.6%+6.1%11th highest of 21
Operating margin-2.5%5.5%3rd lowest of 21
Forward P/E541.7×14.4×most expensive of 15
ROIC minus cost of capital-4.3 pp-2.1 pp4th lowest of 18

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Shanghai Geoharbour Construction 605598.SSChina$913M-48%+9%-3%541.7×n/an/a
Hubei Chutian Smart Communication 600035.SSChina$918M-1%+34%9%n/an/an/a
GRK Infra GRK.HEFinland$903M+30%-7%8%10.0×-1.5%+24.6%
LS Marine Solution 060370.KSSouth Korea$924M-35%+21%6%55.0×n/an/a
Sentia SNTIA.OLNorway$924M+8%+15%5%14.3×-11.1%+4.2%
Galliford Try GFRD.LUnited Kingdom$925M+31%+3%3%14.5×-0.8%+11.4%
I.CO.P ICOP.MIItaly$901M-6%+138%11%17.1×n/an/a
Taihei Dengyo Kaisha 1968.TJapan$899M-22%+19%11%11.2×n/an/a
Raito Kogyo 1926.TJapan$928M-5%+9%13%11.6×-8.0%+5.2%
GR Engineering Services GNG.AXAustralia$891M+40%+3%11%18.3×14.9%+4.7%
Costain COST.LUnited Kingdom$890M+30%-6%5%16.5×0.1%+1.3%
YIT YIT.HEFinland$938M+45%+10%3%75.2×12.8%-10.6%
KEC International KEC.NSIndia$939M-46%-2%5%13.3×n/an/a
Ningbo Construction 601789.SSChina$885M-34%+10%2%n/an/an/a
Shenzhen Tagen 000090.SZChina$883M-11%+1%0%7.7×13.8%+5.6%
Shenzhen Cheng Chung Design 002811.SZChina$949M+48%+28%13%n/a9.1%-6.2%
Shanghai Urban Architecture Design 300983.SZChina$866M+5%-7%-58%n/an/an/a
JSTI 300284.SZChina$963M-25%-4%1%39.1×10.5%-5.4%
Next Geosolutions Europe NXT.MIItaly$861M+22%+68%17%12.7×n/an/a
Beijing New Space Technology 605178.SSChina$861M-18%0%-51%n/an/an/a
Xinjiang Beixin Road & Bridge 002307.SZChina$861M-19%-22%8%n/an/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Shanghai Geoharbour Construction's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Hubei Chutian Smart Communication (600035.SS), GRK Infra (GRK.HE), LS Marine Solution (060370.KS), Sentia (SNTIA.OL), Galliford Try (GFRD.L), I.CO.P (ICOP.MI), Taihei Dengyo Kaisha (1968.T), Raito Kogyo (1926.T).
Is Shanghai Geoharbour Construction expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 541.7× against a peer median of 14.4×, most expensive of 15 in its peer set.
How has Shanghai Geoharbour Construction stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -47.7% against -2.9% for the median peer; over one year -9.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.