Loading…

Gilead SciencesGILDCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Health Care›Biotechnology

Biotechnology company known for HIV treatments (Biktarvy) and prevention (Yeztugo/Descovy), also in oncology and liver disease.

Momentum leader 91
Mkt cap
$207B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$1.15B
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
19.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+23.7 pp
WACC 6.5%
Hurdle
-7 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
A- / AA-
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
90 days
4 Feb 2027
Close · USD$166.89
1D-0.4%
1W-2.2%
1M+13.4%
3M+25.4%
6M+27.9%
YTD+37.6%
1Y+38.7%
ATR %3.1%
Beta0.37
52w lowhigh5.5% off high

What Gilead Sciences does

Biotechnology company known for HIV treatments (Biktarvy) and prevention (Yeztugo/Descovy), also in oncology and liver disease.

Sells patented HIV medicines that patients stay on for years, so Biktarvy sales are steady and rely on keeping the prescription, alongside hepatitis C cures, the cancer drug Trodelvy and cell therapy through its Kite unit. Yeztugo, a twice-yearly prevention injection approved in 2025, is a new line.

Products and services

  • Biktarvy (HIV treatment)
  • Yeztugo/Descovy (HIV prevention PrEP)
  • Trodelvy (oncology)
  • Cell therapy (Kite - Yescarta, Tecartus)

Customers

  • Physicians/hospitals treating HIV and cancer patie
  • Payers/health systems

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Healthcare
  • Biotechnology
  • Antiviral and oncology drug discovery…

What could go right

  • Lenacapavir global PrEP rollout
  • HIV franchise durability

What could go wrong

  • Future HIV patent cliffs
  • Oncology/cell-therapy execution risk

Moat: wide (IP / patents, scale, regulatory licence). Category-leading HIV franchise built on patented combination therapies with very high patient switching costs.

Headquarters: Foster City, California, US · Founded: 1987 · Employees: 17,000

Named competitors

Gilead Sciences at a glance

Size Gilead Sciences (GILD) is a United States Health Care company (Biotechnology) with a market value of $207B, the 54th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $166.89 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 27.9%, against +39.3% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 7 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 6.9% over the last twelve months (peer median -6.6%); the operating margin is 38.4% (peer median 27.3%).

Valuation It trades at 19.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 29.2× (2nd cheapest of 5).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is -7 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 23.7 points above its cost of capital (6.5% WACC).

Credit Gilead Sciences has 22 bonds outstanding ($24.2B), rated A- by the agencies and trading like AA- at a weighted spread of 66 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 1.6% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 4 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012014011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 138GILD 126
Six months, rebased to 100: Gilead Sciences against the median of its 6 peers (local-currency closes).

Gilead Sciences financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$31.1B$29.4B$28.7B$27.1B$27.1B
Revenue growth—+3%+6%0%—
Gross profit$24.9B$23.2B$22.5B$21.0B$21.4B
EBITDA$14.7B$14.6B$13.4B$12.4B$12.9B
Net income-$3.86B$8.51B$480M$5.67B$4.59B
Free cash flow$13.8B$9.46B$10.3B$7.42B$8.34B
Capital expenditure$699M$563M$523M$585M$728M
Total debt$26.2B$25.5B$27.3B$25.7B$25.2B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Gilead Sciences competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+25%+50%+75%+100%+5%+10%+15%+20%AMGNMRNACSLARGXLONN207940GILD6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Gilead Sciences is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%-10%0%+10%20×30×40×AMGNCSLLONN207940GILDRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Gilead Sciences is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+50%+100%+150%0%50%100%150%AMGNCSLARGXLONN207940GILDGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Gilead Sciences is the large dot.

Gilead Sciences competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (GILD vs GSK.L vs MRK vs BMY)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Gilead Sciences GILD$207B+28%+7%38%19.3×-2.9%
GSK GSK.L$102B0%+4%25%10.6×-0.1%
Merck & MRK$362B+33%+5%18%17.4×4.1%
Bristol Myers Squibb BMY$127B+12%+4%33%9.7×-12.9%
AbbVie ABBV$515B+45%+11%36%18.4×-0.1%

How Gilead Sciences compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Gilead Sciences against its 6 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureGILDPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+13.4%+13.1%3rd highest of 7
6-month return+27.9%+39.3%3rd lowest of 7
Distance from 52-week high-5.5%-9.2%4th highest of 7
Revenue growth (TTM)+6.9%-6.6%3rd highest of 7
Operating margin38.4%27.3%2nd highest of 7
Forward P/E19.3×29.2×2nd cheapest of 5
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-2.9%9.6%least demanding of 6
Growth delivered (Del g)+3.6%+11.0%lowest of 6
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-6.5 pp-6.0 pp3rd least demanding of 6
ROIC minus cost of capital+23.7 pp+8.8 pp2nd highest of 7
EV / EBITDA15.3×19.3×2nd cheapest of 5
Net debt / EBITDA1.2×1.8×2nd least indebted of 5
Bond spread66 bp76 bptightest of 4

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Gilead Sciences GILDUnited States$207B+28%+7%38%19.3×-2.9%+3.6%
Amgen AMGNUnited States$249B+40%+9%36%18.9×1.8%+7.8%
Moderna MRNAUnited States$101B+43%-28%-149%n/an/an/a
CSL CSL.AXAustralia$67.2B+105%-2%26%22.4×7.1%+11.0%
argenx SE Sponsored ADR ARGXUnited States$57.5B+19%+71%29%n/a10.9%+151.4%
Lonza LONN.SWSwitzerland$55.4B+39%-11%25%36.1×15.0%+7.7%
Samsung Biologics 207940.KSSouth Korea$53.7B+3%-20%43%38.7×9.6%+31.4%

Gilead Sciences bonds and credit

Gilead Sciences has 22 bonds outstanding with $24.2B face value. The agencies rate it A-; its bonds trade like AA-. Weighted yield 5.65%, a spread of 66 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Gilead Sciences's main competitors?
Named competitors: ViiV Healthcare (GSK) (GSK.L), Merck & Co. (MRK), Bristol Myers Squibb (BMY), AbbVie (ABBV). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Amgen (AMGN), Moderna (MRNA), CSL (CSL.AX), argenx SE Sponsored ADR (ARGX), Lonza (LONN.SW), Samsung Biologics (207940.KS).
Is Gilead Sciences expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 19.3× against a peer median of 29.2×, 2nd cheapest of 5 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is -7 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Gilead Sciences stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +27.9% against +39.3% for the median peer; over one year +38.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.