Loading…

Diamondback EnergyFANGCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Energy›Oil & Gas Production

US independent oil and gas producer focused on unconventional (shale) drilling in the Permian Basin.

Momentum weak 39
Mkt cap
$50.0B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
76%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$426M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
7.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+3.0 pp
WACC 6.8%
Hurdle
-45 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BBB / A-
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
109 days
23 Feb 2027
Close · USD$178.96
1D-0.3%
1W-15.6%
1M-6.6%
3M-10.1%
6M-4.6%
YTD+20.4%
1Y+32.8%
ATR %3.7%
Beta-0.48
52w lowhigh17.5% off high

What Diamondback Energy does

US independent oil and gas producer focused on unconventional (shale) drilling in the Permian Basin.

Is a pure Permian producer selling oil at market prices; profit comes from drilling wells at costs well below those prices. It owns the majority of Viper Energy, a listed vehicle holding royalty interests, which collects payments without drilling. The 2024 purchase of Endeavor added Midland Basin acreage and scale.

Products and services

  • Permian Midland Basin production
  • Permian Delaware Basin production
  • Midstream/royalty interests (Viper)

Customers

  • Refiners/marketers
  • Midstream off-takers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Oil & gas
  • Permian Basin shale E&P
  • Midland/Delaware sub-basins

What could go right

  • Oil price leverage
  • Permian production growth/synergy capture

What could go wrong

  • Oil price cyclicality
  • Integration risk from large M&A (Endeavor)

Moat: narrow (cost advantage, scale). Large contiguous low-cost Permian acreage gives efficient, high-return drilling economics.

Headquarters: Midland, Texas, US · Founded: 2007 · Employees: 1,762

Named competitors

Diamondback Energy at a glance

Size Diamondback Energy (FANG) is a United States Energy company (Oil & Gas Production) with a market value of $50.0B, the 252nd largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $178.96 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 4.6%, against +4.6% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 6 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 21.1% over the last twelve months (peer median -8.5%); the operating margin is 38.9% (peer median 21.4%).

Valuation It trades at 7.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 11.5× (cheapest of 6).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +40%, so the hurdle is -45 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.0 points above its cost of capital (6.8% WACC).

Credit Diamondback Energy has 12 bonds outstanding ($10.00B), rated BBB by the agencies and trading like A- at a weighted spread of 78 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 2.5% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 23 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 104FANG 92
Six months, rebased to 100: Diamondback Energy against the median of its 5 peers (local-currency closes).

Diamondback Energy financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$18.6B$15.0B$11.1B$8.41B$9.64B
Revenue growth—+36%+32%-13%—
Gross profit$7.62B$5.28B$5.01B$4.87B$6.78B
EBITDA$12.5B$9.89B$7.55B$6.33B$7.87B
Net income$2.04B$1.66B$3.32B$3.12B$4.34B
Free cash flow$4.55B$5.24B$3.55B$3.22B$4.39B
Capital expenditure$5.81B$3.52B$2.87B$2.70B$1.94B
Total debt$13.2B$14.9B$13.3B$6.80B$6.38B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Diamondback Energy competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+10%+20%-5%0%+5%WDSSTOTOUCOPORGFANG6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Diamondback Energy is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%+20%7.5×10×12.5×15×WDSSTOTOUCOPORGFANGRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Diamondback Energy is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%STOCOPORGFANGGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Diamondback Energy is the large dot.

Diamondback Energy competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (FANG vs EOG vs COP vs OXY)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Diamondback Energy FANG$50.0B-5%+21%39%7.9×-5.6%
EOG Resources EOG$77.2B+13%+17%35%8.3×-13.5%
ConocoPhillips COP$164B+21%+9%22%11.5×-6.2%
Occidental Petroleum OXY$56.4B+7%-11%23%9.1×-2.5%
Devon Energy DVN$46.4B-7%+18%24%7.6×0.9%
ExxonMobil XOM$677B+16%+21%14%11.8×-5.9%

How Diamondback Energy compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Diamondback Energy against its 5 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureFANGPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-6.6%+0.8%lowest of 6
6-month return-4.6%+4.6%lowest of 6
Distance from 52-week high-17.5%-10.7%lowest of 6
Revenue growth (TTM)+21.1%-8.5%highest of 6
Operating margin38.9%21.4%highest of 6
Forward P/E7.9×11.5×cheapest of 6
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-5.6%10.9%2nd least demanding of 4
Growth delivered (Del g)+39.8%+9.3%highest of 4
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-45.4 pp+2.4 ppleast demanding of 4
ROIC minus cost of capital+3.0 pp-1.9 pp2nd highest of 6
EV / EBITDA5.5×8.0×cheapest of 6
Net debt / EBITDA1.0×1.0×3rd least indebted of 6
Bond spread78 bp107 bp2nd tightest of 5

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Diamondback Energy FANGUnited States$50.0B-5%+21%39%7.9×-5.6%+39.8%
Woodside Energy WDS.AXAustralia$40.4B0%-10%26%9.4×n/an/a
Santos STO.AXAustralia$19.2B+11%-8%21%8.1×11.7%+9.3%
Tourmaline Oil TOU.TOCanada$17.5B-3%+4%1%11.9×n/an/a
ConocoPhillips COPUnited States$164B+21%+9%22%11.5×-6.2%+25.6%
Origin Energy ORG.AXAustralia$14.4B+5%-10%8%16.2×10.9%+5.0%

Diamondback Energy bonds and credit

Diamondback Energy has 12 bonds outstanding with $10.00B face value. The agencies rate it BBB; its bonds trade like A-. Weighted yield 5.60%, a spread of 78 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Diamondback Energy's main competitors?
Named competitors: EOG Resources (EOG), ConocoPhillips (COP), Occidental Petroleum (OXY), Devon Energy (DVN), Exxon Mobil (Pioneer) (XOM). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Woodside Energy (WDS.AX), Santos (STO.AX), Tourmaline Oil (TOU.TO), ConocoPhillips (COP), Origin Energy (ORG.AX).
Is Diamondback Energy expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 7.9× against a peer median of 11.5×, cheapest of 6 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +40%, so the hurdle is -45 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Diamondback Energy stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -4.6% against +4.6% for the median peer; over one year +32.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.