Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › EMA.TO Emera IncorporatedOpen in the cockpit ↗

Emera IncorporatedEMA.TOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Canada · CAD·Utilities›Electric Utilities

Canadian regulated utility holding company, owning electric utilities in Nova Scotia and Florida (Tampa Electric) plus Caribbean operations.

≈ Canada's Duke Energy (regulated utility)Momentum strong 67
Mkt cap
$15.7B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$115M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
20.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-1.7 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Official | Implied
BB+ / BBB+
agencies · bond market
Close · CADC$71.59
1D-0.3%
1W+3.9%
1M+9.5%
3M+1.0%
6M+0.5%
YTD+5.8%
1Y+6.8%
ATR %1.9%
52w lowhigh8.2% off high

What Emera does

Canadian regulated utility holding company, owning electric utilities in Nova Scotia and Florida (Tampa Electric) plus Caribbean operations.

Utilities earn a return set by regulators on the assets they invest in, and pass fuel costs through to customers, so profit grows with the approved asset base rather than electricity sales. Buying TECO Energy, owner of Tampa Electric, in 2016 made Florida the largest part of the group and shifted it from Canada toward the US.

In one line: Canada's Duke Energy (regulated utility).

Products and services

  • Nova Scotia Power (electric utility)
  • Tampa Electric/Peoples Gas (Florida)
  • Caribbean utility operations

Customers

  • Residential/commercial electricity & gas customers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Utilities
  • Regulated electric & gas utilities
  • Multi-jurisdiction utility holding

What could go right

  • Rate base growth via regulated capex
  • Renewables transition investment

What could go wrong

  • Regulatory rate-setting risk
  • Interest rate sensitivity (utility leverage)

Moat: wide (regulatory licence, installed base, scale). Regulated monopoly utility franchises in its service territories, protected by regulatory licence.

Headquarters: Halifax, Canada · Founded: 1998 · Employees: 7,800

Named competitors

Emera at a glance

Size Emera (EMA.TO) is a Canada Utilities company (Electric Utilities) with a market value of $15.7B, the 55th largest of 420 Canada companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at C$71.59 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 0.5%, against +1.6% for the median peer and +5.2% for the Canada market (cap-weighted) — 10th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 10.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +2.0%); the operating margin is 19.3% (peer median 15.3%).

Valuation It trades at 20.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 17.6× (6th most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.7 points below its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Credit Emera has 4 bonds outstanding ($1.50B), rated BB+ by the agencies and trading like BBB+ at a weighted spread of 81 bp.

Relative performance

9010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 103EMA.TO 99
Six months, rebased to 100: Emera against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Emera financials

Reported figures in CAD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueC$8.56BC$8.31BC$6.99BC$6.53BC$7.52B
Revenue growth—+19%+7%-13%—
Gross profitC$2.16BC$2.04BC$1.55BC$1.12BC$1.79B
EBITDAC$2.98BC$2.85BC$2.29BC$1.75BC$2.38B
Net incomeC$1.04BC$1.09BC$567MC$1.04BC$1.01B
Free cash flow-C$1.16B-C$1.73B-C$505M-C$696M-C$1.68B
Capital expenditureC$3.57BC$3.53BC$3.15BC$2.94BC$2.60B
Total debtC$22.1BC$21.6BC$19.9BC$19.9BC$19.1B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Emera competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%-10%0%+10%0902015760600795950300060836NRGLNT600886600674BN4PNWEVRGUN0TATAPOWERCMSTRN9502EMA.TO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Emera is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%10×20×30×0902015760600795950300060836NRGLNTADANIENSOL600886600674BN4PNWEVRGUN0TATAPOWER1038CMSTRN9502EMA.TORevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Emera is the large dot.

Emera competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (EMA.TO vs FTS.TO vs DUK vs NEE)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Emera EMA.TO$15.7B0%+11%19%20.2×n/a
Fortis FTS.TO$31.0B+11%+4%28%22.5×n/a
Duke Energy DUK$99.6B+4%+6%27%18.2×n/a
NextEra Energy NEE$182B-6%+13%30%21.0×18.8%

How Emera compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Emera against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureEMA.TOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+9.5%+2.5%4th highest of 21
6-month return+0.5%+1.6%10th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-8.2%-12.2%10th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+10.8%+2.0%4th highest of 21
Operating margin19.3%15.3%10th highest of 21
Forward P/E20.2×17.6×6th most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-1.7 pp-2.3 pp9th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA15.1×12.4×4th most expensive of 13
Net debt / EBITDA7.3×5.7×2nd most indebted of 15
Bond spread81 bp74 bp3rd widest of 7

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Emera EMA.TOCanada$15.7B0%+11%19%20.2×n/an/a
Huaneng Power International 0902.HKHong Kong$16.2B-6%-3%12%9.3×n/an/a
Kepco 015760.KSSouth Korea$14.4B-30%+2%13%4.5×-1.9%+10.7%
GD Power Development 600795.SSChina$14.4B+13%-1%9%19.2×-0.4%+3.4%
Kansai Electric Power 9503.TJapan$17.3B+2%+2%6%8.2×11.0%+5.6%
Power Assets 0006.HKHong Kong$17.8B+3%-12%50%21.0×35.8%-9.5%
China Res Power 0836.HKHong Kong$13.5B+6%+2%18%9.0×n/an/a
NRG Energy NRGUnited States$18.6B-36%+13%5%9.0×15.4%+27.9%
Alliant Energy LNTUnited States$18.8B+1%+5%23%20.8×n/an/a
Adani Energy Solutions ADANIENSOL.NSIndia$18.9B+5%+33%25%37.4×n/an/a
SDIC Power 600886.SSChina$19.0B+16%-3%32%17.5×-1.6%+6.5%
Sichuan Chuantou Energy 600674.SSChina$13.0B+16%-1%29%17.2×32.3%+10.0%
Keppel BN4.SISingapore$13.0B-13%+11%11%18.9×14.8%-1.9%
Pinnacle West Capital PNWUnited States$12.6B+5%+8%23%19.1×n/an/a
Evergy EVRGUnited States$20.2B+8%+4%26%19.4×n/an/a
Uniper UN0.DEGermany$20.6B0%-14%-8%33.3×1.7%+3.6%
Tata Power TATAPOWER.NSIndia$11.9B-20%-4%13%25.0×n/an/a
Cki 1038.HKHong Kong$21.6B+9%-9%-3%7.1×-0.9%-9.3%
CMS Energy CMSUnited States$21.7B-5%+8%20%17.1×n/an/a
Terna TRN.MIItaly$22.0B-2%+11%42%17.8×n/an/a
Chubu Electric Power 9502.TJapan$11.2B-13%+3%0%10.3×n/an/a

Emera bonds and credit

Emera has 4 bonds outstanding with $1.50B face value. The agencies rate it BB+; its bonds trade like BBB+. Weighted yield 5.39%, a spread of 81 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Emera's main competitors?
Named competitors: Fortis Inc (FTS.TO), Duke Energy (DUK), NextEra Energy (NEE). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Huaneng Power International (0902.HK), Kepco (015760.KS), GD Power Development (600795.SS), Kansai Electric Power (9503.T), Power Assets (0006.HK), China Res Power (0836.HK).
Is Emera expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 20.2× against a peer median of 17.6×, 6th most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Emera stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +0.5% against +1.6% for the median peer; over one year +6.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.