Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › DOKA.SW dormakaba Holding AGOpen in the cockpit ↗

dormakaba Holding AGDOKA.SWCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Switzerland · CHF·Information Technology›Computer Communications

Swiss-German maker of door hardware, locks and access-control systems for buildings, formed from the dorma-Kaba merger.

≈ A door hardware/access-control maker like a smaller AllegionMomentum leader 84
Mkt cap
$3.47B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
66%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$3.98M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
21.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+22.8 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-12 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
116 days
2 Mar 2027
Close · CHFCHF 68.20
1D-3.5%
1W-2.6%
1M+9.3%
3M+12.5%
6M+27.7%
YTD+5.9%
1Y+4.6%
ATR %2.8%
52w lowhigh5.8% off high

What dormakaba does

Swiss-German maker of door hardware, locks and access-control systems for buildings, formed from the dorma-Kaba merger.

Sells locks, door hardware and electronic access systems through installers, security specialists and distributors, increasingly adding recurring income from software, maintenance and service on installed systems. Europe, the Middle East and Africa form the largest region.

In one line: A door hardware/access-control maker like a smaller Allegion.

Products and services

  • Door locks/hardware
  • Electronic access control systems
  • Automatic door systems

Customers

  • Building owners/facility managers
  • Construction/architecture firms

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information Technology
  • Security/access control
  • Door hardware and access-control…

What could go right

  • Commercial building security upgrade cycles
  • Smart building/IoT access control adoption

What could go wrong

  • Construction-cycle sensitivity
  • Integration complexity from past merger

Moat: narrow (brand, installed base, distribution). Established brand and installed base in commercial door/access systems, though the market has strong incumbents.

Headquarters: Rumlang, Switzerland · Founded: 2015 · Employees: 15,347

Named competitors

dormakaba at a glance

Size dormakaba (DOKA.SW) is a Switzerland Information Technology company (Computer Communications) with a market value of $3.47B, the 72nd largest of 158 Switzerland companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CHF 68.20 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 27.7%, against +0.2% for the median peer and +11.6% for the Switzerland market (cap-weighted) — 3rd highest of 12 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 2.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.3%); the operating margin is 12.7% (peer median 4.1%).

Valuation It trades at 21.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 18.1× (3rd most expensive of 9).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +2%, so the hurdle is -12 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 22.8 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 2 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026DOKA.SW 129Peer median 98
Six months, rebased to 100: dormakaba against the median of its 11 peers (local-currency closes).

dormakaba financials

Reported figures in CHF; fiscal year ends 2026-06-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
RevenueCHF 2.79BCHF 2.79BCHF 2.87BCHF 2.84BCHF 2.85B
Revenue growth—-3%+1%0%—
Gross profitCHF 1.16BCHF 1.13BCHF 1.15BCHF 1.09BCHF 1.08B
EBITDACHF 464MCHF 436MCHF 428MCHF 412MCHF 374M
Net incomeCHF 97.0MCHF 97.0MCHF 97.9MCHF 42.2MCHF 45.7M
Free cash flowCHF 210MCHF 210MCHF 193MCHF 225MCHF 227M
Capital expenditureCHF 129MCHF 129MCHF 107MCHF 98.6MCHF 98.5M
Total debtn/aCHF 502MCHF 800MCHF 605MCHF 719M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

dormakaba competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-40%-20%0%616624420023966883876744002960178320RDWR3009516745002446DOKA.SW6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. dormakaba is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%10×15×20×61660023966744002960RDWR3009516745002446DOKA.SWRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. dormakaba is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%6744002960RDWR6745002446DOKA.SWGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. dormakaba is the large dot.

dormakaba competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (DOKA.SW vs ALLE vs ASSA-B.ST vs HON)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
dormakaba DOKA.SW$3.47B+28%-3%13%21.2×-9.3%
Allegion ALLE$15.6B+39%+10%22%18.7×7.6%
ASSA ABLOY ASSA-B.ST$44.8B+15%0%17%24.4×9.0%
Honeywell Technologies HON$69.8B-1%-17%18%23.2×4.1%

How dormakaba compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

dormakaba against its 11 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureDOKA.SWPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+9.3%-9.9%2nd highest of 12
6-month return+27.7%+0.2%3rd highest of 12
Distance from 52-week high-5.8%-53.9%highest of 12
Revenue growth (TTM)-2.7%+6.3%4th lowest of 12
Operating margin12.7%4.1%2nd highest of 12
Forward P/E21.2×18.1×3rd most expensive of 9
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-9.3%12.0%least demanding of 6
Growth delivered (Del g)+2.2%+5.3%2nd lowest of 6
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-11.5 pp-1.3 ppleast demanding of 6
ROIC minus cost of capital+22.8 pp-3.7 pphighest of 12
EV / EBITDA7.3×18.8×cheapest of 5
Net debt / EBITDA0.8×-2.0×2nd most indebted of 6

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
dormakaba DOKA.SWSwitzerland$3.47B+28%-3%13%21.2×-9.3%+2.2%
CIG Shanghai 6166.HKHong Kong$4.11B-63%+45%11%9.7×n/an/a
Easy Smart 2442.HKHong Kong$2.72B+72%-33%-15%n/an/an/a
Fujian Star-Net Communication 002396.SZChina$2.61B+13%+18%4%19.3×n/an/a
CICT Mobile Communication Technology Co., Ltd.Class A 688387.SSChina$5.65B-44%-2%-7%n/an/an/a
Nohmi Bosai 6744.TJapan$1.58B0%+6%14%16.9×-4.4%+5.3%
Jade Bird Integrated Technologies 002960.SZChina$1.40B-12%-5%6%23.8×12.0%+13.2%
Seojin System 178320.KSSouth Korea$1.33B-52%+9%-5%n/an/an/a
Radware RDWRUnited States$1.26B+9%+11%4%22.0×32.4%+3.8%
Shenzhen BSC Technology 300951.SZChina$1.11B+33%+16%-5%19.3×n/an/a
Hochiki 6745.TJapan$952M0%+5%12%14.7×-0.1%+6.7%
Guangdong Shenglu Telecommunication Tech 002446.SZChina$928M-32%-10%0%16.9×43.5%+1.0%

Questions

Who are dormakaba's main competitors?
Named competitors: Allegion (ALLE), ASSA ABLOY (ASSA-B.ST), Honeywell (access control) (HON). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes CIG Shanghai (6166.HK), Easy Smart (2442.HK), Fujian Star-Net Communication (002396.SZ), CICT Mobile Communication Technology Co., Ltd.Class A (688387.SS), Nohmi Bosai (6744.T), Jade Bird Integrated Technologies (002960.SZ).
Is dormakaba expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 21.2× against a peer median of 18.1×, 3rd most expensive of 9 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +2%, so the hurdle is -12 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has dormakaba stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +27.7% against +0.2% for the median peer; over one year +4.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.