Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › CJ.TO Cardinal Energy Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Cardinal Energy Ltd.CJ.TOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Canada · CAD·Energy›Oil & Gas Production

Canadian conventional oil producer operating low-decline heavy and light oil assets in Alberta.

≈ An Alberta conventional/heavy oil producerMomentum neutral 44
Mkt cap
$1.40B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
78%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$11.8M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
11.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+2.6 pp
WACC 8.6%
Hurdle
-13 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
132 days
18 Mar 2027
Close · CADC$11.15
1D+1.1%
1W-15.7%
1M-9.8%
3M+1.9%
6M-8.0%
YTD+28.3%
1Y+38.7%
ATR %3.8%
52w lowhigh18.6% off high

What Cardinal Energy does

Canadian conventional oil producer operating low-decline heavy and light oil assets in Alberta.

In one line: An Alberta conventional/heavy oil producer.

Products and services

  • Conventional heavy oil production
  • Conventional light oil production

Customers

  • Oil refiners/marketers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Energy exploration & production
  • Conventional heavy oil production
  • Conventional light oil production

What could go right

  • Oil price strength
  • Low-decline production stability

What could go wrong

  • Oil price volatility
  • Heavy oil price differential risk

Moat: none. Commodity oil producer; low decline rates aid economics but there is no structural cost moat versus peers.

Headquarters: Calgary, Canada · Founded: 2010

Named competitors

Cardinal Energy at a glance

Size Cardinal Energy (CJ.TO) is a Canada Energy company (Oil & Gas Production) with a market value of $1.40B, the 212th largest of 420 Canada companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at C$11.15 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 8.0%, against -18.5% for the median peer and +5.2% for the Canada market (cap-weighted) — 6th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 17.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.9%); the operating margin is 30.5% (peer median 20.1%).

Valuation It trades at 11.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 9.9× (8th most expensive of 18).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +18%, so the hurdle is -13 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.6 points above its cost of capital (8.6% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 18 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026CJ.TO 91Peer median 82
Six months, rebased to 100: Cardinal Energy against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Cardinal Energy financials

Reported figures in CAD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueC$550MC$439MC$497MC$481MC$592M
Revenue growth—-12%+3%-19%—
Gross profitC$204MC$121MC$176MC$165MC$276M
EBITDAC$302MC$207MC$260MC$250MC$361M
Net incomeC$63.0MC$20.8MC$108MC$104MC$303M
Free cash flowC$106MC$128MC$144MC$131MC$219M
Capital expenditureC$186MC$215MC$187MC$104MC$118M
Total debtC$135MC$243MC$90.3MC$50.1MC$35.8M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Cardinal Energy competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%+20%+40%BPTPXTBNOR603619AAVNEXTMAUVETSERSDE002221ENOGTNZVLERKHWTTRMERHPKDECCJ.TO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Cardinal Energy is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%+300%+400%0×10×20×30×BPTPXTBNOR603619AAVVETSERSDE002221TNZVLEWTTRMERHPKDECCJ.TORevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Cardinal Energy is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+50%+100%+150%0%50%100%150%BPTPXTVETSERENOGTNZVLEDECCJ.TOGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Cardinal Energy is the large dot.

Cardinal Energy competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (CJ.TO vs BTE.TO)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Cardinal Energy CJ.TO$1.40B-8%+18%31%11.8×5.3%
Baytex Energy BTE.TO$2.95B-11%-8%15%7.5×4.7%

How Cardinal Energy compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Cardinal Energy against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureCJ.TOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-9.8%-10.1%9th highest of 21
6-month return-8.0%-18.5%6th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-18.6%-32.7%2nd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+17.5%+8.9%7th highest of 18
Operating margin30.5%20.1%4th highest of 18
Forward P/E11.8×9.9×8th most expensive of 18
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)5.3%-11.7%2nd most demanding of 11
Growth delivered (Del g)+17.9%+29.4%5th lowest of 10
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-12.5 pp-32.8 pp2nd most demanding of 10
ROIC minus cost of capital+2.6 pp+0.7 pp8th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA6.9×4.1×3rd most expensive of 17
Net debt / EBITDA0.5×1.1×5th least indebted of 17

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Cardinal Energy CJ.TOCanada$1.40B-8%+18%31%11.8×5.3%+17.9%
Beach Energy BPT.AXAustralia$1.42B-16%-9%21%5.5×-12.2%+4.2%
Parex Resources PXT.TOCanada$1.36B-30%+14%29%3.5×-11.2%+11.5%
BlueNord BNOR.OLNorway$1.49B-6%+28%32%10.9×-12.2%+15.0%
Zhongman Petroleum and Natural Gas 603619.SSChina$1.30B-42%-13%20%20.7×n/an/a
Vedanta Oil and Gas VOGL.NSIndia$1.27Bn/an/an/an/an/an/a
Advantage Energy AAV.TOCanada$1.26B+6%+14%20%16.0×n/an/a
NextDecade NEXTUnited States$1.56B-23%n/an/an/an/an/a
Etablissements Maurel & Prom MAU.PAFrance$1.57B-29%-11%31%5.4×n/an/a
Vermilion Energy VET.TOCanada$1.61B-9%-2%14%4.3×-0.8%+9.1%
Serica Energy SER.LUnited Kingdom$1.20B-17%+64%23%12.6×-13.0%+29.4%
Spartan Delta SDE.TOCanada$1.63B-11%+93%32%7.6×n/an/a
Oriental Energy 002221.SZChina$1.17B-36%-22%3%15.2×n/an/a
Energean ENOG.LUnited Kingdom$1.72B-19%+9%27%4.2×-2.4%+126.8%
Tenaz Energy TNZ.TOCanada$1.13B-21%+381%16%11.9×17.7%+103.4%
Valeura Energy VLE.TOCanada$1.07B+11%+6%17%9.9×-17.3%+141.2%
Rockhopper Exploration RKH.LUnited Kingdom$937M-18%n/an/an/an/an/a
Select Water Solutions WTTRUnited States$2.09B-4%-2%4%28.9×n/an/a
Meren Energy MER.TOCanada$921M-19%+388%22%5.8×-16.4%n/a
HighPeak Energy HPKUnited States$903M+23%-13%16%24.6×n/an/a
Diversified Energy DECUnited States$899M-19%+109%15%2.1×-0.5%+32.3%

Questions

Who are Cardinal Energy's main competitors?
Named competitors: Baytex Energy (BTE.TO). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Beach Energy (BPT.AX), Parex Resources (PXT.TO), BlueNord (BNOR.OL), Zhongman Petroleum and Natural Gas (603619.SS), Vedanta Oil and Gas (VOGL.NS), Advantage Energy (AAV.TO).
Is Cardinal Energy expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 11.8× against a peer median of 9.9×, 8th most expensive of 18 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +18%, so the hurdle is -13 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Cardinal Energy stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -8.0% against -18.5% for the median peer; over one year +38.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.