Loading…

Cameco CorpCCO.TOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Canada · CAD·Energy›Other Metals/Minerals

One of the world's largest uranium producers, mining and processing uranium fuel for nuclear power plants.

≈ No direct US peer; closest is Freeport-McMoRan.Momentum laggard 9
Mkt cap
$31.3B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$112M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
48.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-4.9 pp
WACC 9.2%
Hurdle
+34 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
98 days
12 Feb 2027
Close · CADC$100.65
1D+5.0%
1W-6.5%
1M-20.7%
3M-25.9%
6M-37.9%
YTD-19.9%
1Y-25.0%
ATR %5.2%
52w lowhigh44.9% off high

What Cameco does

One of the world's largest uranium producers, mining and processing uranium fuel for nuclear power plants.

Sells uranium mostly under long-term contracts with utilities, so earnings depend on the mix of older fixed-price contracts and newer market-linked ones, as well as on buying uranium to fill commitments. It operates Cigar Lake and McArthur River in northern Saskatchewan and holds a minority share of Kazakhstan's Inkai mine. Since 2023 it has held a large stake in Westinghouse with Brookfield.

In one line: No direct US peer; closest is Freeport-McMoRan..

Products and services

  • Uranium mining (Saskatchewan, Kazakhstan JV)
  • UF6 conversion
  • Fuel manufacturing
  • Westinghouse nuclear services (part-owned)

Customers

  • Nuclear utilities worldwide

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Nuclear fuel cycle
  • Uranium mining
  • Fuel processing/conversion

What could go right

  • Nuclear power revival/new reactor builds
  • Long-term contracting at higher prices

What could go wrong

  • Uranium price cycles
  • Geopolitical supply risk (Kazakhstan, Russia)

Moat: narrow (scale, installed base, regulatory licence). Owns some of the world's highest-grade uranium deposits and long-term utility supply contracts.

Headquarters: Saskatoon, Canada · Founded: 1988 · Employees: 3,082

Named competitors

Cameco at a glance

Size Cameco (CCO.TO) is a Canada Energy company (Other Metals/Minerals) with a market value of $31.3B, the 35th largest of 420 Canada companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at C$100.65 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 37.9%, against +1.4% for the median peer and +5.2% for the Canada market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 11 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 0.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +14.8%); the operating margin is 12.3% (peer median 22.3%).

Valuation It trades at 48.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 11.2× (most expensive of 11).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 48% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +14%, so the hurdle is +34 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.9 points below its cost of capital (9.2% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 12 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 101CCO.TO 63
Six months, rebased to 100: Cameco against the median of its 10 peers (local-currency closes).

Cameco financials

Reported figures in CAD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueC$3.48BC$3.48BC$3.14BC$2.59BC$1.87B
Revenue growth—+11%+21%+39%—
Gross profitC$828MC$931MC$765MC$513MC$171M
EBITDAC$743MC$886MC$754MC$498MC$217M
Net incomeC$398MC$590MC$172MC$361MC$89.4M
Free cash flowC$308MC$1.02BC$605MC$494MC$122M
Capital expenditureC$431MC$333MC$212MC$154MC$143M
Total debtC$1.01BC$1.01BC$1.29BC$1.79BC$1.01B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Cameco competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-20%-10%0%PPLCVETOUIMOTRPWCPSUKEYCNQENBCCO.TO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Cameco is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%20×40×PPLCVETOUIMOTRPWCPSUKEYENBCCO.TORevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Cameco is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%PPLCVEIMOTRPWCPSUCNQENBCCO.TOGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Cameco is the large dot.

Cameco competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (CCO.TO vs NXE.TO vs PDN.AX vs EFR.TO)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Cameco CCO.TO$31.3B-38%0%12%48.8×47.7%
NexGen Energy NXE.TO$5.57B-31%n/an/an/an/a
Paladin Energy PDN.AX$2.32B-33%+64%4%50.9×n/a
Energy Fuels EFR.TO$1.78B-70%+70%-79%61.7×n/a
Uranium Energy UEC$3.43B-54%-44%-358%n/an/a
Boss Energy BOE.AX$403M0%+100%8%16.1×18.7%
Denison Mines DML.TO$2.00B-39%-9%-2,101%n/an/a
Centrus Energy LEU$2.14B-50%+8%2%34.5×n/a

How Cameco compares with its peers

Peer set: Sector in the same market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Cameco against its 10 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureCCO.TOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-20.7%+0.9%lowest of 11
6-month return-37.9%+1.4%lowest of 11
Distance from 52-week high-44.9%-13.4%lowest of 11
Revenue growth (TTM)+0.4%+14.8%3rd lowest of 11
Operating margin12.3%22.3%3rd lowest of 11
Forward P/E48.8×11.2×most expensive of 11
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)47.7%1.3%most demanding of 9
Growth delivered (Del g)+14.1%+15.9%4th lowest of 9
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+33.6 pp-16.3 ppmost demanding of 9
ROIC minus cost of capital-4.9 pp+2.5 pp2nd lowest of 11
EV / EBITDA59.2×8.5×most expensive of 11
Net debt / EBITDA0.2×0.6×2nd least indebted of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Sector in the same market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Cameco CCO.TOCanada$31.3B-38%0%12%48.8×47.7%+14.1%
Pembina Pipeline PPL.TOCanada$28.3B+11%0%31%22.2×10.7%+5.2%
Cenovus Energy CVE.TOCanada$50.2B0%+12%21%6.7×-14.4%+29.7%
Tourmaline Oil TOU.TOCanada$17.5B-3%+4%1%11.9×n/an/a
Imperial Oil IMO.TOCanada$59.5B+3%+19%14%10.5×-0.2%+17.1%
TC Energy TRP.TOCanada$65.1B-1%+6%46%23.0×11.4%+3.4%
Whitecap Resources WCP.TOCanada$14.4B+6%+73%38%8.8×-7.1%+44.8%
Suncor Energy SU.TOCanada$81.0B+12%+27%24%8.6×-11.7%+14.7%
Keyera KEY.TOCanada$10.6B0%0%11%17.4×n/an/a
Canadian Natural Resources CNQ.TOCanada$101B+12%+18%27%10.3×2.8%+18.1%
Enbridge ENB.TOCanada$107B-10%+29%13%22.1×12.6%+10.9%

Questions

Who are Cameco's main competitors?
Named competitors: Kazatomprom (private or unlisted), NexGen Energy (NXE.TO), Paladin Energy (PDN.AX), Orano (private or unlisted), Energy Fuels (EFR.TO), Uranium Energy (UEC). The cockpit's measured peer set (sector in the same market, nearest in size) also includes Pembina Pipeline (PPL.TO), Cenovus Energy (CVE.TO), Tourmaline Oil (TOU.TO), Imperial Oil (IMO.TO), TC Energy (TRP.TO), Whitecap Resources (WCP.TO).
Is Cameco expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 48.8× against a peer median of 11.2×, most expensive of 11 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 48% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +14%, so the hurdle is +34 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Cameco stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -37.9% against +1.4% for the median peer; over one year -25.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.