Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › BFAM Bright Horizons Family Solutions, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Bright Horizons Family Solutions, Inc.BFAMCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Consumer Discretionary›Miscellaneous Commercial Services

Operator of employer-sponsored child care centers, back-up care and educational advisory services for working families.

Momentum laggard 16
Mkt cap
$2.57B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$80.8M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
9.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+1.4 pp
WACC 8.2%
Hurdle
-9 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
104 days
18 Feb 2027
Close · USD$53.52
1D-3.5%
1W-2.7%
1M-22.3%
3M-26.2%
6M-24.2%
YTD-47.2%
1Y-46.6%
ATR %5.8%
Beta-0.00
52w lowhigh49.4% off high

What Bright Horizons Family Solutions does

Operator of employer-sponsored child care centers, back-up care and educational advisory services for working families.

Child-care centres are paid for mainly by parents' tuition, usually topped up by the employer that sponsors the centre; back-up care is sold to employers as a benefit and billed per use or as an access fee. Employer contracts run for years, though enrolment depends on staff working on site. It also operates in the UK and the Netherlands.

Products and services

  • Full-time employer-sponsored child care centers
  • Back-up care services
  • Educational advisory/tuition assistance services

Customers

  • Employers (as a benefit)
  • Working parents/families

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer/business services
  • Employer-sponsored child care
  • Center-based child care, back-up care…

What could go right

  • Employer child-care benefit adoption growth
  • Back-up care demand growth

What could go wrong

  • Labor cost/staffing shortages in child care
  • Employer budget cyclicality

Moat: narrow (scale, switching costs, brand). Long-term employer contracts and a large center network create switching costs and scale advantages.

Headquarters: Newton, Massachusetts · Founded: 1986 · Employees: 32,200

Named competitors

  • KinderCare Learning Companies KLC

Bright Horizons Family Solutions at a glance

Size Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) is a United States Consumer Discretionary company (Miscellaneous Commercial Services) with a market value of $2.57B, the 1639th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $53.52 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 24.2%, against -7.7% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 8 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 6.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +9.2%); the operating margin is 10.3% (peer median 16.4%).

Valuation It trades at 9.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 10.3× (3rd cheapest of 8).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +14%, so the hurdle is -9 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.4 points above its cost of capital (8.2% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 5.0% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 18 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 95BFAM 78
Six months, rebased to 100: Bright Horizons Family Solutions against the median of its 7 peers (local-currency closes).

Bright Horizons Family Solutions financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$3.07B$2.93B$2.69B$2.42B$2.02B
Revenue growth—+9%+11%+20%—
Gross profit$707M$739M$632M$485M$374M
EBITDA$414M$456M$382M$271M$192M
Net income-$134M$193M$140M$74.0M$80.3M
Free cash flow$253M$259M$240M$165M$118M
Capital expenditure$103M$92.2M$97.3M$91.0M$70.6M
Total debt$2.11B$1.76B$1.79B$1.86B$1.97B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Bright Horizons Family Solutions competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%-25%0%+25%+50%LOPEMHLAURTALUTICOURADTBFAM6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Bright Horizons Family Solutions is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%10×20×30×LOPEMHLAURTALUTICOURADTBFAMRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Bright Horizons Family Solutions is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-5%0%+5%+10%+15%0%10%LOPEMHLAURADTBFAMGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Bright Horizons Family Solutions is the large dot.

Bright Horizons Family Solutions competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (BFAM vs KLC)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Bright Horizons Family Solutions BFAM$2.57B-24%+7%10%9.8×5.0%
KinderCare Learning Companies KLCn/a-1%n/an/an/an/a

How Bright Horizons Family Solutions compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Bright Horizons Family Solutions against its 7 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureBFAMPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-22.3%-18.6%3rd lowest of 8
6-month return-24.2%-7.7%3rd lowest of 8
Distance from 52-week high-49.4%-23.2%2nd lowest of 8
Revenue growth (TTM)+6.7%+9.2%3rd lowest of 8
Operating margin10.3%16.4%3rd lowest of 8
Forward P/E9.8×10.3×3rd cheapest of 8
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)5.0%-6.1%most demanding of 5
Growth delivered (Del g)+14.1%+4.1%highest of 5
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-9.1 pp-10.5 pp3rd least demanding of 5
ROIC minus cost of capital+1.4 pp+2.6 pp3rd lowest of 8
EV / EBITDA11.0×8.1×2nd most expensive of 6
Net debt / EBITDA4.8×1.3×most indebted of 7

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Bright Horizons Family Solutions BFAMUnited States$2.57B-24%+7%10%9.8×5.0%+14.1%
Grand Canyon Education LOPEUnited States$3.07B-29%+7%28%11.1×-7.3%+5.6%
McGraw Hill MHUnited States$2.08B-8%0%16%5.6×-5.6%+2.6%
Laureate Education LAURUnited States$4.56B+2%+21%26%14.5×-6.7%+10.7%
TAL Education Group Sponsored ADR TALUnited States$4.77B-8%+26%16%9.8×n/an/a
Universal Technical Institute UTIUnited States$1.10B+49%+9%5%30.1×n/an/a
Coursera COURUnited States$989M-35%+44%-4%6.4×n/an/a
ADT ADTUnited States$6.66B+44%+2%25%10.3×-2.9%-0.7%

Questions

Who are Bright Horizons Family Solutions's main competitors?
Named competitors: KinderCare Learning Companies (KLC). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Grand Canyon Education (LOPE), McGraw Hill (MH), Laureate Education (LAUR), TAL Education Group Sponsored ADR (TAL), Universal Technical Institute (UTI), Coursera (COUR).
Is Bright Horizons Family Solutions expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 9.8× against a peer median of 10.3×, 3rd cheapest of 8 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +14%, so the hurdle is -9 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Bright Horizons Family Solutions stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -24.2% against -7.7% for the median peer; over one year -46.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.