Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › BETCO-DKK.CO Better Collective A/SOpen in the cockpit ↗

Better Collective A/SBETCO-DKK.COCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Denmark · DKK·Industrials›Broadcasting
Momentum laggard 2
Mkt cap
$407M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
54%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$386,467
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
9.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+0.8 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-39 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
12 days
18 Nov 2026
Close · DKKDKK 45.55
1D-0.3%
1W+6.3%
1M-6.2%
3M-44.3%
6M-51.5%
YTD-42.5%
1Y-42.3%
ATR %4.5%
52w lowhigh56.6% off high

What Better Collective A/S does

Employees: 1,391

Better Collective A/S at a glance

Size Better Collective A/S (BETCO-DKK.CO) is a Denmark Industrials company (Broadcasting) with a market value of $407M, the 55th largest of 59 Denmark companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at DKK 45.55 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 51.5%, against +15.2% for the median peer and +8.8% for the Denmark market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 6 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 0.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +9.7%); the operating margin is 19.4% (peer median 3.5%).

Valuation It trades at 9.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.4× (cheapest of 5).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -10% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +29%, so the hurdle is -39 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.8 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 18 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

507510012511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 115BETCO-DKK.CO 49
Six months, rebased to 100: Better Collective A/S against the median of its 6 peers (local-currency closes).

Better Collective A/S financials

Reported figures in DKK; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueDKK 2.56BDKK 2.57BDKK 2.76BDKK 2.50BDKK 1.91B
Revenue growth—-7%+11%+31%—
Gross profitDKK 737MDKK 716MDKK 820MDKK 844MDKK 664M
EBITDADKK 806MDKK 779MDKK 843MDKK 850MDKK 602M
Net incomeDKK 222MDKK 180MDKK 253MDKK 305MDKK 340M
Free cash flowDKK 529MDKK 388MDKK 339MDKK 642MDKK 328M
Capital expenditureDKK 248MDKK 191MDKK 280MDKK 260MDKK 696M
Total debtDKK 2.07BDKK 2.03BDKK 2.06BDKK 1.96BDKK 1.55B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Better Collective A/S competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-10%0%+10%AOJ-BGUBRANTGDFDSDNORDBETCO-DKK.CO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Better Collective A/S is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+5%+10%+15%10×15×20×AOJ-BNTGDFDSDNORDBETCO-DKK.CORevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Better Collective A/S is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%AOJ-BIGNTGDFDSBETCO-DKK.COGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Better Collective A/S is the large dot.

Better Collective A/S competitors and peer comparison

How Better Collective A/S compares with its peers

Peer set: Sector in the same market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Better Collective A/S against its 6 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureBETCO-DKK.COPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-6.2%+7.4%2nd lowest of 7
6-month return-51.5%+15.2%lowest of 6
Distance from 52-week high-56.6%-13.2%lowest of 7
Revenue growth (TTM)-0.7%+9.7%2nd lowest of 7
Operating margin19.4%3.5%highest of 7
Forward P/E9.2×14.4×cheapest of 5
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-9.7%2.6%least demanding of 5
Growth delivered (Del g)+29.4%+16.8%2nd highest of 5
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-39.1 pp-14.7 pp2nd least demanding of 5
ROIC minus cost of capital+0.8 pp-0.1 pp2nd highest of 7
EV / EBITDA5.7×9.3×3rd cheapest of 6
Net debt / EBITDA2.3×2.7×3rd least indebted of 6

Peer table

Peer set: Sector in the same market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Better Collective A/S BETCO-DKK.CODenmark$407M-52%-1%19%9.2×-9.7%+29.4%
Brdr A & O Johansen A/S AOJ-B.CODenmark$439M+17%+12%5%11.8×0.7%+8.4%
InstallatorGruppen A/S IG.CODenmark$584Mn/a+51%4%n/a9.1%+50.8%
Gubra A/S GUBRA.CODenmark$746M-6%-90%-72%n/an/an/a
NTG Nordic Transport Group A/S NTG.CODenmark$1.09B+71%+16%5%20.6×-0.4%+16.4%
Dfds A/s DFDS.CODenmark$1.33B+8%+3%3%17.0×4.6%+17.2%
Dampskibsselskabet NORDEN A/S DNORD.CODenmark$1.46B+15%+7%3%9.6×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Better Collective A/S's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Brdr A & O Johansen A/S (AOJ-B.CO), InstallatorGruppen A/S (IG.CO), Gubra A/S (GUBRA.CO), NTG Nordic Transport Group A/S (NTG.CO), Dfds A/s (DFDS.CO), Dampskibsselskabet NORDEN A/S (DNORD.CO).
Is Better Collective A/S expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 9.2× against a peer median of 14.4×, cheapest of 5 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -10% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +29%, so the hurdle is -39 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Better Collective A/S stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -51.5% against +15.2% for the median peer; over one year -42.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.