Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › ARLP Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.Open in the cockpit ↗

Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.ARLPCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Energy›Coal

Mines and markets thermal and metallurgical coal in the Illinois Basin and Appalachia, plus royalty income from oil, gas and minerals.

Momentum neutral 51
Mkt cap
$3.14B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
69%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$8.30M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
8.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+5.4 pp
WACC 6.2%
Hurdle
-21 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BB- / BBB
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
87 days
1 Feb 2027
Close · USD$24.39
1D-1.1%
1W-8.7%
1M-1.1%
3M-1.6%
6M-1.9%
YTD+5.0%
1Y-1.4%
ATR %2.3%
Beta-0.11
52w lowhigh17.2% off high

What Alliance Resource Partners, L.P does

Mines and markets thermal and metallurgical coal in the Illinois Basin and Appalachia, plus royalty income from oil, gas and minerals.

Sells most coal under multi-year contracts, so a large share of each year's tonnage and price is set in advance. Mineral royalties on oil and gas land add income that doesn't require mining costs. As a partnership, it distributes much of its cash to unit holders.

Products and services

  • Thermal coal
  • Metallurgical coal
  • Oil and gas minerals/royalty interests

Customers

  • Power utilities
  • Industrial customers
  • Export markets

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Energy
  • Coal
  • Coal mining and royalty income

What could go right

  • Long-term utility supply contract stability
  • Royalty income diversification

What could go wrong

  • Structural decline in thermal coal power demand
  • Coal mining regulatory/ESG pressure

Moat: narrow (scale, installed base). Low-cost Illinois Basin coal reserves with long-term utility supply contracts, though coal demand is structurally declining.

Headquarters: Tulsa, Oklahoma, US · Founded: 1971 · Employees: 3,575

Named competitors

Alliance Resource Partners, L.P at a glance

Size Alliance Resource Partners, L.P (ARLP) is a United States Energy company (Coal) with a market value of $3.14B, the 1514th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $24.39 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 1.9%, against -10.3% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 3rd highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 1.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.3%); the operating margin is 18.0% (peer median 9.4%).

Valuation It trades at 8.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 11.0× (3rd cheapest of 18).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -10% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +11%, so the hurdle is -21 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 5.4 points above its cost of capital (6.2% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $3.43B at 30 Sep 2026, down 12% on a year earlier — 1.6 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Credit Alliance Resource Partners, L.P has 1 bond outstanding ($400M), rated BB- by the agencies and trading like BBB at a weighted spread of 83 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 1.2% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 1 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026ARLP 99Peer median 87
Six months, rebased to 100: Alliance Resource Partners, L.P against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Alliance Resource Partners, L.P financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$2.21B$2.19B$2.45B$2.57B$2.42B
Revenue growth—-10%-5%+6%—
Gross profit$495M$468M$507M$751M$741M
EBITDA$719M$685M$711M$940M$937M
Net income$309M$308M$355M$612M$558M
Free cash flow$406M$388M$374M$362M$516M
Capital expenditure$249M$271M$453M$469M$286M
Total debt$680M$466M$487M$351M$434M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Alliance Resource Partners, L.P competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%-10%0%-20%-10%0%NHC600546601666601918600925601001CNRWHC000937601101HCC600348000723600403BTUYALAMR1277000983600985ARLP6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Alliance Resource Partners, L.P is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%5×10×15×20×NHC600546601666601918601001CNRWHC000937601101HCC600348BTUAMR1277000983600985ARLPRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Alliance Resource Partners, L.P is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%0%20%NHC600546600925601001CNRWHC000937601101YAL000983600985ARLPGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Alliance Resource Partners, L.P is the large dot.

Alliance Resource Partners, L.P competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (ARLP vs BTU vs CNR vs NRP)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P ARLP$3.14B-2%-2%18%8.2×-10.0%
Peabody Energy BTU$1.95B-32%+3%-4%6.3×n/a
Core Natural Resources CNR$3.94B-7%+30%-1%16.4×-1.6%
Natural Resource Partners L.P NRP$1.56B+6%-10%63%n/a-8.1%

How Alliance Resource Partners, L.P compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Alliance Resource Partners, L.P against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureARLPPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-1.1%-10.5%2nd highest of 21
6-month return-1.9%-10.3%3rd highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-17.2%-28.3%2nd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-1.9%+3.3%7th lowest of 21
Operating margin18.0%9.4%7th highest of 21
Forward P/E8.2×11.0×3rd cheapest of 18
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-10.0%-5.0%3rd least demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)+10.6%+7.7%7th highest of 13
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-20.6 pp-12.5 pp4th least demanding of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital+5.4 pp+1.1 pp3rd highest of 21
EV / EBITDA5.4×7.3×2nd cheapest of 9
Net debt / EBITDA0.8×-0.2×2nd most indebted of 9
Bond spread83 bpn/a—

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P ARLPUnited States$3.14B-2%-2%18%8.2×-10.0%+10.6%
New Hope NHC.AXAustralia$3.08B+5%0%16%11.0×-1.1%+11.0%
Shanxi Coal International Energy 600546.SSChina$3.29B-21%-10%21%9.9×-16.9%-10.0%
Pingdingshan Tianan Coal Mining 601666.SSChina$2.83B-10%+17%8%14.4×n/an/a
China Coal Xinji Energy 601918.SSChina$3.67B+5%+28%24%10.2×n/an/a
Jiangsu Xukuang Energy 600925.SSChina$3.77B-10%+19%10%n/a-2.7%+4.8%
Jinneng Holding Shanxi Coal Industry 601001.SSChina$3.87B-20%+4%24%11.8×-13.4%+3.7%
Core Natural Resources CNRUnited States$3.94B-7%+30%-1%16.4×-1.6%+32.9%
Whitehaven Coal WHC.AXAustralia$3.97B-10%-7%10%10.6×4.2%+28.2%
Jizhong Energy Resources 000937.SZChina$2.48B-17%+7%8%15.2×-4.2%-6.0%
Beijing Haohua Energy Resource 601101.SSChina$2.39B-5%+3%24%9.3×-9.6%+14.4%
Warrior Met Coal HCCUnited States$4.44B-2%+37%14%8.6×n/an/a
Shan Xi Hua Yang Group New Energy 600348.SSChina$4.54B-20%-10%21%12.8×n/an/a
Shanxi Meijin Energy 000723.SZChina$2.15B-27%-2%-8%n/an/an/a
Henan Dayou Energy 600403.SSChina$2.04B-2%+6%-29%n/an/an/a
Peabody Energy BTUUnited States$1.95B-32%+3%-4%6.3×n/an/a
Yancoal Australia YAL.AXAustralia$5.07B-16%-1%8%10.4×-2.3%+10.6%
Alpha Metallurgical Resources AMRUnited States$1.87B-20%-13%-2%22.5×n/an/a
Kinetic Development 1277.HKHong Kong$1.84B-15%-3%31%6.2×-6.4%+11.5%
Shanxi Coking Coal Energy 000983.SZChina$5.38B-10%-5%9%12.7×-6.4%+2.7%
Huaibei Mining 600985.SSChina$5.70B-5%+9%7%11.2×-5.8%-4.7%

Alliance Resource Partners, L.P bonds and credit

Alliance Resource Partners, L.P has 1 bond outstanding with $400M face value. The agencies rate it BB-; its bonds trade like BBB. Weighted yield 5.14%, a spread of 83 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Alliance Resource Partners, L.P backlog

Alliance Resource Partners, L.P reported $3.43B of remaining performance obligations at 30 Sep 2026, down 12% from a year earlier and down 6% from the previous quarter. That is 1.6 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: 0.65.

Questions

Who are Alliance Resource Partners, L.P's main competitors?
Named competitors: Peabody Energy (BTU), Core Natural Resources (CNR), Natural Resource Partners (NRP). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes New Hope (NHC.AX), Shanxi Coal International Energy (600546.SS), Pingdingshan Tianan Coal Mining (601666.SS), China Coal Xinji Energy (601918.SS), Jiangsu Xukuang Energy (600925.SS), Jinneng Holding Shanxi Coal Industry (601001.SS).
Is Alliance Resource Partners, L.P expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 8.2× against a peer median of 11.0×, 3rd cheapest of 18 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -10% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +11%, so the hurdle is -21 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Alliance Resource Partners, L.P stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -1.9% against -10.3% for the median peer; over one year -1.4%.
What is Alliance Resource Partners, L.P's backlog?
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $3.43B at 30 Sep 2026, -12% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.