Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 9903.HK Shanghai Iluvatar CoreX Semiconductor Co., Ltd. Class HOpen in the cockpit ↗

Shanghai Iluvatar CoreX Semiconductor Co., Ltd. Class H9903.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Information Technology›Semiconductors

Chinese designer of general-purpose GPU chips (GPGPU) for AI training and inference workloads.

≈ A small Chinese Nvidia challengerMomentum weak 21
Mkt cap
$6.06B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
19%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$97.4M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-24.1 pp
WACC 5.3%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
117 days
3 Mar 2027
Close · HKDHK$318.80
1Dn/a
1W-16.9%
1M-23.7%
3M-39.6%
6M-5.7%
YTDn/a
1Yn/a
ATR %13.0%
52w lowhigh64.1% off high

What Shanghai Iluvatar CoreX Semiconductor does

Chinese designer of general-purpose GPU chips (GPGPU) for AI training and inference workloads.

Sells GPU cards and full servers to Chinese cloud and AI customers, with its software kit sold alongside because buyers need working training and inference tools. It has yet to turn a profit and relied on funding rounds before listing in Hong Kong.

In one line: A small Chinese Nvidia challenger.

Products and services

  • TG-series AI training GPUs
  • ZK-series inference GPUs
  • GPGPU servers and clusters
  • Software SDK (training frameworks, inference engines)

Customers

  • Chinese cloud providers and AI enterprises

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Semiconductors
  • AI accelerator chips
  • GPGPU chip design plus software stack

What could go right

  • China AI-chip localization amid Nvidia export limits
  • Domestic AI capex boom

What could go wrong

  • Technology gap versus Nvidia/TSMC leading nodes
  • Reliance on China-only foundry capacity

Moat: narrow (IP / patents, process know-how). One of few Chinese firms with a working GPGPU-plus-software stack, aided by Nvidia export limits, but far behind Nvidia technically.

Headquarters: Shanghai, China · Founded: 2015 · Employees: 759

Named competitors

Shanghai Iluvatar CoreX Semiconductor at a glance

Size Shanghai Iluvatar CoreX Semiconductor (9903.HK) is a Hong Kong Information Technology company (Semiconductors) with a market value of $6.06B, the 231st largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$318.80 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 5.7%, against -22.1% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — 7th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 157.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +22.3%); the operating margin is -64.6% (peer median 16.9%).

Valuation It trades at 24.9× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 5.6× (2nd most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 24.1 points below its cost of capital (5.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 3 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10020011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20269903.HK 104Peer median 73
Six months, rebased to 100: Shanghai Iluvatar CoreX Semiconductor against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Shanghai Iluvatar CoreX Semiconductor financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$1.85BHK$1.12BHK$585MHK$319MHK$220M
Revenue growth—+92%+83%+45%—
Gross profitHK$631MHK$647MHK$120MHK$27.9MHK$25.9M
EBITDA-HK$980M-HK$906M-HK$829M-HK$781M-HK$567M
Net income-HK$311M-HK$1.09B-HK$968M-HK$874M-HK$609M
Free cash flow-HK$4.12B-HK$1.39B-HK$780M-HK$973M-HK$755M
Capital expenditureHK$557MHK$217MHK$192MHK$142MHK$181M
Total debtn/aHK$1.19BHK$731MHK$564MHK$227M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Shanghai Iluvatar CoreX Semiconductor competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%-50%-25%0%+25%6082300373600460688172688099688432FORM002049688313CRUS002129688018SIMO68822369633015366887289903.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Shanghai Iluvatar CoreX Semiconductor is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%+150%10×20×60823003736004606881726880996884323661FORM002049688313CRUS002129688018SIMO30075168822330153653479903.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Shanghai Iluvatar CoreX Semiconductor is the large dot.

Shanghai Iluvatar CoreX Semiconductor competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (9903.HK vs 6082.HK vs 688256.SS vs NVDA)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
Shanghai Iluvatar CoreX Semiconductor 9903.HK$6.06B-6%+158%-65%24.9×n/a
Shanghai Biren Technology 6082.HK$6.03B-67%+542%-47%16.4×n/a
Cambricon Technologies 688256.SS$75.7B-30%+104%33%44.3×n/a
Nvidia NVDA$4.50T-13%+83%65%14.7×26.3%

How Shanghai Iluvatar CoreX Semiconductor compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Shanghai Iluvatar CoreX Semiconductor against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure9903.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-23.7%-20.0%9th lowest of 21
6-month return-5.7%-22.1%7th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-64.1%-51.5%3rd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+157.8%+22.3%2nd highest of 21
Operating margin-64.6%16.9%2nd lowest of 21
EV / Sales24.9×5.6×2nd most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-24.1 pp-3.2 pp2nd lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Shanghai Iluvatar CoreX Semiconductor 9903.HKHong Kong$6.06B-6%+158%-65%24.9×n/an/a
Shanghai Biren Technology 6082.HKHong Kong$6.03B-67%+542%-47%16.4×n/an/a
Yangzhou Yangjie Electronic Technology 300373.SZChina$5.99B-3%+29%18%4.4×18.1%+22.3%
Hangzhou Silan Microelectronics 600460.SSChina$5.93B-18%+12%2%3.2×n/an/a
Beijing YanDong MicroElectronic 688172.SSChina$5.86B-26%+22%-89%24.2×n/an/a
Amlogic (Shanghai) 688099.SSChina$5.84B-13%+39%17%4.2×n/an/a
GRINM Semiconductor Materials 688432.SSChina$6.34B+131%+36%19%30.8×n/an/a
SG Micro 3661.HKHong Kong$5.78Bn/a+54%17%6.1×3.4%+25.8%
FormFactor FORMUnited States$6.36B-45%+29%21%6.1×22.4%+2.5%
Unigroup Guoxin Microelectronics 002049.SZChina$6.37B-35%-1%18%6.9×24.4%+13.5%
Henan Shijia Photons Technology 688313.SSChina$5.72B-36%+73%22%11.8×n/an/a
Cirrus Logic CRUSUnited States$5.69B-34%+6%23%2.4×1.5%+7.8%
TCL Zhonghuan Renewable Energy Technology 002129.SZChina$5.68B+9%+13%-27%3.6×n/an/a
Espressif Systems (Shanghai) 688018.SSChina$5.61B+30%+23%19%11.7×36.0%+25.3%
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation Sponsored ADR SIMOUnited States$5.52B-36%+104%21%3.2×n/an/a
Suzhou Maxwell Technologies 300751.SZChina$6.72B-33%-26%6%7.5×47.7%+29.0%
Jinko Solar 688223.SSChina$6.73B-34%-18%-11%1.3×n/an/a
Rohm 6963.TJapan$6.76B-19%+12%4%2.0×n/an/a
Sigmastar Technology 301536.SZChina$5.41B+4%+99%31%6.7×19.6%+20.0%
GalaxyCore 688728.SSChina$5.41B+1%+16%3%5.2×28.8%+3.8%
Vanguard International Semiconductor 5347.TWOTaiwan$6.82B-22%+10%17%4.8×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Shanghai Iluvatar CoreX Semiconductor's main competitors?
Named competitors: Biren Technology (6082.HK), Cambricon Technologies (688256.SS), Nvidia (NVDA). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Shanghai Biren Technology (6082.HK), Yangzhou Yangjie Electronic Technology (300373.SZ), Hangzhou Silan Microelectronics (600460.SS), Beijing YanDong MicroElectronic (688172.SS), Amlogic (Shanghai) (688099.SS), GRINM Semiconductor Materials (688432.SS).
Is Shanghai Iluvatar CoreX Semiconductor expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 24.9× against a peer median of 5.6×, 2nd most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Shanghai Iluvatar CoreX Semiconductor stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -5.7% against -22.1% for the median peer.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.