Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 6082.HK Shanghai Biren Technology Co., Ltd. Class HOpen in the cockpit ↗

Shanghai Biren Technology Co., Ltd. Class H6082.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Information Technology›Semiconductors

Chinese GPU startup designing general-purpose AI computing chips as a domestic Nvidia alternative.

≈ A small Chinese Nvidia challengerMomentum laggard 2
Mkt cap
$6.03B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
86%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$65.0M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-25.9 pp
WACC 5.3%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
117 days
3 Mar 2027
Close · HKDHK$19.39
1D-7.9%
1W-3.5%
1M-43.7%
3M-51.5%
6M-66.9%
YTDn/a
1Yn/a
ATR %11.6%
52w lowhigh72.6% off high

What Shanghai Biren Technology does

Chinese GPU startup designing general-purpose AI computing chips as a domestic Nvidia alternative.

Sells GPU cards and complete servers to Chinese cloud and AI operators, so revenue arrives in large project orders from a few customers. It has yet to turn a profit, and the Hong Kong listing raised funds to keep developing chips. The US trade blacklist added it in 2023, limiting access to the most advanced foreign chip manufacturing.

In one line: A small Chinese Nvidia challenger.

Products and services

  • BR100-series training/inference GPUs
  • BR106/BR110/BR166 GPU chips
  • Intelligent computing servers/systems

Customers

  • Chinese cloud and AI infrastructure operators

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Semiconductors
  • AI accelerator chips
  • GPGPU chip design plus intelligent…

What could go right

  • China AI-chip self-sufficiency drive
  • Domestic hyperscaler capex

What could go wrong

  • US export-control risk on tools/IP
  • Execution and yield risk versus leading-edge Nvidia chips

Moat: narrow (IP / patents, process know-how). First mainland Chinese GPU maker to list in Hong Kong, riding China's AI-chip localization push, but unproven at scale versus Nvidia.

Headquarters: Shanghai, China · Founded: 2019

Named competitors

Shanghai Biren Technology at a glance

Size Shanghai Biren Technology (6082.HK) is a Hong Kong Information Technology company (Semiconductors) with a market value of $6.03B, the 234th largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$19.39 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 66.9%, against -18.8% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 541.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +26.0%); the operating margin is -47.5% (peer median 17.5%).

Valuation It trades at 16.4× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 6.1× (4th most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 25.9 points below its cost of capital (5.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 3 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

5010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 796082.HK 34
Six months, rebased to 100: Shanghai Biren Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Shanghai Biren Technology financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$2.48BHK$1.12BHK$365MHK$68.5MHK$580,276
Revenue growth—+207%+433%+11,712%—
Gross profitHK$1.19BHK$452MHK$66.0M-HK$168M-HK$205M
EBITDA-HK$947M-HK$1.28B-HK$896M-HK$1.08B-HK$1.28B
Net income-HK$16.7B-HK$17.9B-HK$1.67B-HK$1.93B-HK$1.71B
Free cash flow-HK$4.04B-HK$2.66B-HK$1.16B-HK$1.04B-HK$1.57B
Capital expenditureHK$616MHK$381MHK$109MHK$154MHK$225M
Total debtn/aHK$32.0BHK$9.63BHK$8.89BHK$8.34B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Shanghai Biren Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%-50%-25%0%+25%9903300373600460688172688099688432688313FORM002049CRUS002129688018SIMO30153668872868822369633003956082.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Shanghai Biren Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+200%+400%10×20×99033003736004606881726880993661688432688313002049CRUS688018SIMO3015363007516882233003956082.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Shanghai Biren Technology is the large dot.

Shanghai Biren Technology competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (6082.HK vs 9903.HK vs 688256.SS vs NVDA)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
Shanghai Biren Technology 6082.HK$6.03B-67%+542%-47%16.4×n/a
Shanghai Iluvatar CoreX Semiconductor 9903.HK$6.06B-6%+158%-65%24.9×n/a
Cambricon Technologies 688256.SS$75.7B-30%+104%33%44.3×n/a
Nvidia NVDA$4.50T-13%+83%65%14.7×26.3%

How Shanghai Biren Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Shanghai Biren Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure6082.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-43.7%-20.0%2nd lowest of 21
6-month return-66.9%-18.8%lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-72.6%-53.9%lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+541.6%+26.0%highest of 21
Operating margin-47.5%17.5%3rd lowest of 21
EV / Sales16.4×6.1×4th most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-25.9 pp-2.9 pplowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Shanghai Biren Technology 6082.HKHong Kong$6.03B-67%+542%-47%16.4×n/an/a
Shanghai Iluvatar CoreX Semiconductor 9903.HKHong Kong$6.06B-6%+158%-65%24.9×n/an/a
Yangzhou Yangjie Electronic Technology 300373.SZChina$5.99B-3%+29%18%4.4×18.1%+22.3%
Hangzhou Silan Microelectronics 600460.SSChina$5.93B-18%+12%2%3.2×n/an/a
Beijing YanDong MicroElectronic 688172.SSChina$5.86B-26%+22%-89%24.2×n/an/a
Amlogic (Shanghai) 688099.SSChina$5.84B-13%+39%17%4.2×n/an/a
SG Micro 3661.HKHong Kong$5.78Bn/a+54%17%6.1×3.4%+25.8%
GRINM Semiconductor Materials 688432.SSChina$6.34B+131%+36%19%30.8×n/an/a
Henan Shijia Photons Technology 688313.SSChina$5.72B-36%+73%22%11.8×n/an/a
FormFactor FORMUnited States$6.36B-45%+29%21%6.1×22.4%+2.5%
Unigroup Guoxin Microelectronics 002049.SZChina$6.37B-35%-1%18%6.9×24.4%+13.5%
Cirrus Logic CRUSUnited States$5.69B-34%+6%23%2.4×1.5%+7.8%
TCL Zhonghuan Renewable Energy Technology 002129.SZChina$5.68B+9%+13%-27%3.6×n/an/a
Espressif Systems (Shanghai) 688018.SSChina$5.61B+30%+23%19%11.7×36.0%+25.3%
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation Sponsored ADR SIMOUnited States$5.52B-36%+104%21%3.2×n/an/a
Sigmastar Technology 301536.SZChina$5.41B+4%+99%31%6.7×19.6%+20.0%
Suzhou Maxwell Technologies 300751.SZChina$6.72B-33%-26%6%7.5×47.7%+29.0%
GalaxyCore 688728.SSChina$5.41B+1%+16%3%5.2×28.8%+3.8%
Jinko Solar 688223.SSChina$6.73B-34%-18%-11%1.3×n/an/a
Rohm 6963.TJapan$6.76B-19%+12%4%2.0×n/an/a
Hubei Feilihua Quartz Glass 300395.SZChina$5.35B-38%+50%24%13.3×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Shanghai Biren Technology's main competitors?
Named competitors: Iluvatar CoreX (9903.HK), Cambricon Technologies (688256.SS), Nvidia (NVDA). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Shanghai Iluvatar CoreX Semiconductor (9903.HK), Yangzhou Yangjie Electronic Technology (300373.SZ), Hangzhou Silan Microelectronics (600460.SS), Beijing YanDong MicroElectronic (688172.SS), Amlogic (Shanghai) (688099.SS), SG Micro (3661.HK).
Is Shanghai Biren Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 16.4× against a peer median of 6.1×, 4th most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Shanghai Biren Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -66.9% against -18.8% for the median peer.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.