Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 9301.T Mitsubishi Logistics CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Mitsubishi Logistics Corporation9301.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Air Freight/Couriers

Warehousing, port logistics and real estate company within the Mitsubishi group, operating bonded warehouses and terminals.

≈ A Japanese Prologis-meets-freight-forwarderMomentum laggard 13
Mkt cap
$2.67B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
67%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$14.5M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
16.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-3.8 pp
WACC 6.3%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
84 days
29 Jan 2027
Close · JPY¥1,186
1D-4.6%
1W-20.1%
1M-19.0%
3M-19.6%
6M-15.1%
YTD-0.9%
1Y+4.0%
ATR %3.8%
52w lowhigh28.2% off high

What Mitsubishi Logistics does

Warehousing, port logistics and real estate company within the Mitsubishi group, operating bonded warehouses and terminals.

Charges storage fees by volume and period, plus handling and transport, from warehouses and port facilities at Japanese ports; the real-estate side leases buildings, which adds steadier income alongside the cargo-dependent warehousing. It is a member of the Mitsubishi group.

In one line: A Japanese Prologis-meets-freight-forwarder.

Products and services

  • Warehousing/storage
  • International freight forwarding
  • Real estate leasing
  • Port terminal operations

Customers

  • Trading companies and manufacturers needing storag
  • Corporate real estate tenants

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Logistics & warehousing
  • Warehousing/terminal operations & real…

What could go right

  • E-commerce driven warehouse demand
  • Real estate leasing income growth

What could go wrong

  • Trade volume cyclicality
  • Real estate market sensitivity

Moat: narrow (scale, installed base, distribution). Long-held port-adjacent warehouse real estate and Mitsubishi group logistics relationships.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 1887 · Employees: 4,991

Named competitors

Mitsubishi Logistics at a glance

Size Mitsubishi Logistics (9301.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Air Freight/Couriers) with a market value of $2.67B, the 398th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥1,186 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 15.1%, against -9.2% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 6th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 1.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.9%); the operating margin is 5.9% (peer median 3.4%).

Valuation It trades at 16.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 12.4× (7th most expensive of 16).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.8 points below its cost of capital (6.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 29 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 899301.T 84
Six months, rebased to 100: Mitsubishi Logistics against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Mitsubishi Logistics financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥282B¥273B¥284B¥255B¥301B
Revenue growth—-4%+12%-15%—
Gross profit¥32.9B¥31.3B¥34.2B¥31.4B¥34.2B
EBITDA¥34.4B¥34.3B¥38.6B¥35.1B¥38.8B
Net income¥31.5B¥54.8B¥31.9B¥27.8B¥27.2B
Free cash flow-¥9.12B-¥12.6B¥16.5B¥23.5B¥20.1B
Capital expenditure¥15.2B¥19.1B¥13.2B¥18.3B¥20.4B
Total debt¥159B¥117B¥118B¥119B¥108B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Mitsubishi Logistics competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%-10%0%+10%002120IDLAEGISVOPAK9069603871001213600739600575DELHIVERY6001796035656007556011569075ODETHUBG90640021839301.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Mitsubishi Logistics is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%25×50×75×002120IDLAEGISVOPAK9069603871600575DELHIVERY60015360356560075560115690640021839301.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Mitsubishi Logistics is the large dot.

Mitsubishi Logistics competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (9301.T vs 9364.T vs 9147.T vs 9101.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Mitsubishi Logistics 9301.T$2.67B-15%-1%6%16.0×n/a
Kamigumi 9364.T$2.71B-12%+5%12%15.5×-3.2%
Nippon Express Hldgs 9147.T$8.22B+35%+2%3%17.6×7.9%
Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha 9101.T$16.8B+17%0%6%9.0×7.8%

How Mitsubishi Logistics compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Mitsubishi Logistics against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure9301.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-19.0%-1.4%lowest of 21
6-month return-15.1%-9.2%6th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-28.2%-23.3%8th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-1.1%+6.9%7th lowest of 20
Operating margin5.9%3.4%6th highest of 19
Forward P/E16.0×12.4×7th most expensive of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital-3.8 pp-2.5 pp7th lowest of 19
EV / EBITDA14.7×9.4×3rd most expensive of 7
Net debt / EBITDA2.2×2.3×3rd least indebted of 7

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Mitsubishi Logistics 9301.TJapan$2.67B-15%-1%6%16.0×n/an/a
Yunda 002120.SZChina$2.74B-20%+7%4%9.7×-13.2%+9.0%
ID Logistics IDL.PAFrance$2.80B+7%+16%4%30.3×10.4%+17.9%
Aegis Vopak Terminals AEGISVOPAK.NSIndia$2.89B+14%+17%53%61.3×n/an/a
SENKO 9069.TJapan$2.45B+23%+7%4%15.2×4.4%+9.5%
Jiayou International Logistics 603871.SSChina$2.41B-8%-10%19%11.3×-7.9%+20.7%
China Railway Special Cargo Logistics 001213.SZChina$2.35B-11%-3%3%n/a2.1%+7.2%
Liaoning Cheng Da 600739.SSChina$2.29B-16%-27%-17%n/a4.4%-10.1%
Huaihe Energy 600575.SSChina$3.38B-12%+38%n/a12.2×n/an/a
Delhivery DELHIVERY.NSIndia$3.40B-11%+24%0%81.8×n/an/a
Xiamen C&D 600153.SSChina$3.77B-8%-6%1%12.4×21.2%+9.3%
Antong 600179.SSChina$3.81B-7%+9%16%n/a-4.0%+13.5%
Shanghai Zhonggu Logistics 603565.SSChina$3.97B+16%+4%27%10.4×-14.4%+0.4%
Xiamen International Trade 600755.SSChina$1.77B-10%+28%0%11.5×n/an/a
Eastern Air Logistics 601156.SSChina$4.70B+23%+20%14%10.9×-16.0%+9.9%
Fukuyama Transporting 9075.TJapan$1.51B+18%+6%4%11.6×12.0%+2.2%
Compagnie de l'Odet ODET.PAFrance$4.74B-30%-83%-8%n/a24.3%-29.4%
CMST Development 600787.SSChina$1.49B-12%+23%0%n/an/an/a
Hub HUBGUnited States$1.48B-44%n/an/a51.6×n/an/a
Yamato 9064.TJapan$4.83B+26%+2%2%34.5×8.9%+1.9%
Eternal Asia Supply Chain Management 002183.SZChina$1.48B-32%-25%0%54.3×29.9%0.0%

Questions

Who are Mitsubishi Logistics's main competitors?
Named competitors: Mitsui-Soko Holdings (9364.T), Nippon Express Holdings (9147.T), Yusen Logistics (NYK) (9101.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Yunda (002120.SZ), ID Logistics (IDL.PA), Aegis Vopak Terminals (AEGISVOPAK.NS), SENKO (9069.T), Jiayou International Logistics (603871.SS), China Railway Special Cargo Logistics (001213.SZ).
Is Mitsubishi Logistics expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 16.0× against a peer median of 12.4×, 7th most expensive of 16 in its peer set.
How has Mitsubishi Logistics stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -15.1% against -9.2% for the median peer; over one year +4.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.