Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 8066.T Mitani CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Mitani Corporation8066.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Wholesale Distributors

Japanese trading company distributing steel products, machinery and construction materials, based in Toyama.

≈ A regional steel-and-building-materials trading houseMomentum weak 34
Mkt cap
$1.45B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
33%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$382,873
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
+13.0 pp
WACC 9.5%
Hurdle
-9 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
6 days
12 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥2,695
1D-2.1%
1W-2.9%
1M-22.2%
3M-5.9%
6M+4.1%
YTD+17.2%
1Y+19.0%
ATR %4.0%
52w lowhigh26.8% off high

What Mitani does

Japanese trading company distributing steel products, machinery and construction materials, based in Toyama.

In one line: A regional steel-and-building-materials trading house.

Products and services

  • Steel products distribution
  • Construction materials trading
  • Machinery distribution

Customers

  • Construction companies
  • Manufacturers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Trading/distribution
  • Steel and building materials trading
  • Machinery distribution

What could go right

  • Construction/infrastructure demand in central Japan

What could go wrong

  • Steel price cyclicality
  • Thin trading margins

Moat: none (distribution). Regional distribution relationships, but trading margins are thin and the business is not highly differentiated.

Headquarters: Toyama, Japan · Founded: 1918 · Employees: 2,102

Named competitors

Mitani at a glance

Size Mitani (8066.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Wholesale Distributors) with a market value of $1.45B, the 585th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥2,695 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 4.1%, against -4.7% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 8th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 0.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.0%); the operating margin is 9.7% (peer median 7.9%).

Valuation It trades at 0.3× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.4× (3rd cheapest of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -12% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -3%, so the hurdle is -9 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 13.0 points above its cost of capital (9.5% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 12 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012014011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20268066.T 101Peer median 95
Six months, rebased to 100: Mitani against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Mitani financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥341B¥339B¥339B¥325B¥320B
Revenue growth—0%+4%+1%—
Gross profit¥63.6B¥60.6B¥58.4B¥52.0B¥47.6B
EBITDA¥38.8B¥38.0B¥37.0B¥31.6B¥27.0B
Net income¥24.2B¥23.5B¥19.0B¥18.2B¥14.9B
Free cash flown/a¥21.6B¥20.9B¥27.0B¥18.0B
Capital expendituren/a¥6.30B¥4.50B¥4.59B¥2.57B
Total debt¥10.1B¥9.45B¥8.60B¥7.28B¥8.86B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Mitani competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%-20%0%+20%600113600058AGSEPRO-B60528900209219798098HLMNDSGR601086000065601801ART8279603809601026IMD8066.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Mitani is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%+20%0×5×10×600113600058ADIGAGSEPRO-B60528900209219798098HLMN601086000065601801ART8279603809601026IMD8066.TRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Mitani is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%20%40%600113600058AGSEPRO-B6052890020921979HLMNDSGR601086000065ART8279IMD8066.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Mitani is the large dot.

Mitani competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (8066.T vs 8078.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
Mitani 8066.T$1.45B+4%+1%10%0.3×-12.2%
Hanwa 8078.T$2.29B+7%+6%2%0.2×-4.2%

How Mitani compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Mitani against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure8066.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-22.2%-1.1%3rd lowest of 21
6-month return+4.1%-4.7%8th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-26.8%-33.7%8th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+0.6%+7.0%7th lowest of 21
Operating margin9.7%7.9%9th highest of 21
EV / Sales0.3×1.4×3rd cheapest of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-12.2%6.1%3rd least demanding of 17
Growth delivered (Del g)-3.1%+9.2%4th lowest of 17
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-9.1 pp-6.1 pp7th least demanding of 17
ROIC minus cost of capital+13.0 pp+0.3 pp3rd highest of 20
EV / EBITDA3.1×11.6×cheapest of 13
Net debt / EBITDA-3.4×0.9×2nd least indebted of 14

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Mitani 8066.TJapan$1.45B+4%+1%10%0.3×-12.2%-3.1%
ZheJiang Dong Ri 600113.SSChina$1.48B-46%-1%16%13.1×38.5%+7.6%
Minmetals Development 600058.SSChina$1.40B-22%-16%1%0.4×20.4%-4.7%
ADI Global Distribution ADIGUnited States$1.39Bn/a+14%4%0.4×n/an/a
Hour Glass AGS.SISingapore$1.38B+10%+18%15%1.3×-8.7%+12.5%
Electrolux Professional EPRO-B.STSweden$1.52B+20%-4%10%1.4×4.9%+10.9%
Shanghai Luoman Technologies 605289.SSChina$1.35B-45%+170%13%3.6×36.2%+25.7%
Xinjiang Zhongtai Chemical 002092.SZChina$1.57B-41%+7%3%1.4×-4.2%-19.5%
Taikisha 1979.TJapan$1.32B-5%-1%8%0.5×-13.3%+7.2%
Inabata & 8098.TJapan$1.31B+6%+5%3%0.3×-7.8%+7.6%
Hillman Solutions HLMNUnited States$1.62B+6%+6%6%1.6×17.9%+2.6%
Distribution Solutions DSGRUnited States$1.62B+27%+6%4%1.2×15.5%+41.3%
Gansu Guofang Industry & Trade (Group) 601086.SSChina$1.27B+42%+17%7%9.3×33.6%-4.8%
Redox RDX.AXAustralia$1.22B+2%+7%11%1.3×-7.8%+10.8%
Norinco International Cooperation 000065.SZChina$1.72B-23%-21%9%1.0×-5.1%+1.1%
Anhui Xinhua Media 601801.SSChina$1.72B-3%-16%4%0.3×n/an/a
Arteche Lantegi Elkartea ART.MCSpain$1.77B-36%+11%14%3.1×7.2%+13.9%
AGTech 8279.HKHong Kong$1.78B+109%+24%8%10.2×-14.9%+36.3%
Chengdu Haoneng Technology 603809.SSChina$1.16B-23%+18%10%3.7×n/an/a
Techstorm Advanced Material 601026.SSChina$1.16B-33%+8%6%2.4×n/an/a
Imdex IMD.AXAustralia$1.15B-21%+21%16%3.7×20.1%+14.5%

Questions

Who are Mitani's main competitors?
Named competitors: Hanwa Co. (8078.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes ZheJiang Dong Ri (600113.SS), Minmetals Development (600058.SS), ADI Global Distribution (ADIG), Hour Glass (AGS.SI), Electrolux Professional (EPRO-B.ST), Shanghai Luoman Technologies (605289.SS).
Is Mitani expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 0.3× against a peer median of 1.4×, 3rd cheapest of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -12% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -3%, so the hurdle is -9 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Mitani stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +4.1% against -4.7% for the median peer; over one year +19.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.