Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 8050.TWO iBASE Technology Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

iBASE Technology Inc.8050.TWOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Information Technology›Electronic Components
Momentum strong 68
Mkt cap
$312M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
88%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$5.63M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-4.4 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
118 days
4 Mar 2027
Close · TWDNT$52.70
1D-5.4%
1W-13.9%
1M-15.0%
3M-10.7%
6M+16.6%
YTD+22.3%
1Y+3.9%
ATR %4.9%
52w lowhigh24.9% off high

What iBASE Technology does

No business profile yet.

iBASE Technology at a glance

Size iBASE Technology (8050.TWO) is a Taiwan Information Technology company (Electronic Components) with a market value of $312M, the 638th largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$52.70 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 16.6%, against -20.6% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 4.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +14.3%); the operating margin is 1.5% (peer median 6.5%).

Valuation It trades at 2.4× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.1× (6th most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.4 points below its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 4 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

7510012515011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20268050.TWO 119Peer median 78
Six months, rebased to 100: iBASE Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

iBASE Technology financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$5.64BNT$5.36BNT$5.18BNT$6.00BNT$6.77B
Revenue growth—+3%-14%-11%—
Gross profitNT$1.19BNT$1.06BNT$1.14BNT$1.40BNT$1.88B
EBITDANT$330MNT$224MNT$361MNT$672MNT$1.17B
Net incomeNT$537MNT$211MNT$588MNT$716MNT$1.14B
Free cash flow-NT$944MNT$335MNT$204MNT$1.00B-NT$1.02B
Capital expenditureNT$176MNT$339MNT$331MNT$329MNT$1.64B
Total debtNT$4.31BNT$2.91BNT$3.52BNT$3.58BNT$3.44B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

iBASE Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-40%-20%0%68859209046029055061256768308882132375PLT008060PACT4771033640690862094927695813000255403013298050.TWO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. iBASE Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%1×2×3×68859209046029055061256768308882132375PLT008060PACT47710336406209492713000255403013298050.TWORevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. iBASE Technology is the large dot.

iBASE Technology competitors and peer comparison

How iBASE Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

iBASE Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure8050.TWOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-15.0%-20.6%7th highest of 21
6-month return+16.6%-20.6%2nd highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-24.9%-44.2%4th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-4.8%+14.3%2nd lowest of 21
Operating margin1.5%6.5%5th lowest of 21
EV / Sales2.4×1.1×6th most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-4.4 pp-0.5 pp7th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA40.4×5.9×most expensive of 15
Net debt / EBITDA7.0×0.1×most indebted of 15

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
iBASE Technology 8050.TWOTaiwan$312M+17%-5%2%2.4×n/an/a
ComNav Technology 688592.SSChina$312M-38%+16%-3%3.1×n/an/a
BH Co., Ltd. 090460.KSSouth Korea$319M-60%+9%4%0.3×-13.0%+20.0%
DK Tech 290550.KSSouth Korea$304M-19%+26%6%0.9×n/an/a
Kenmec Mechanical Engineering 6125.TWOTaiwan$291M-37%+29%-10%2.5×n/an/a
Tamura 6768.TJapan$339M-22%+8%4%0.6×n/an/a
Axiomtek 3088.TWOTaiwan$340M-14%+35%12%1.2×-3.5%+8.8%
Taiwan PCB Techvest 8213.TWTaiwan$286M-3%+8%4%0.3×n/an/a
Kaimei Electronic 2375.TWTaiwan$285M-4%+7%8%1.4×16.9%-3.0%
poLight PLT.OLNorway$281M+78%+245%-278%69.3×n/an/a
DAEDUCK 008060.KSSouth Korea$280M-27%+36%10%0.6×-8.6%+233.4%
Proact IT PACT.STSweden$354M+8%+4%7%0.7×-5.8%+5.2%
Vizionfocus 4771.TWTaiwan$355M+8%+26%29%3.2×n/an/a
Nepes 033640.KSSouth Korea$273M-50%+11%7%1.3×14.0%+8.7%
IRISO Electronics 6908.TJapan$359M-28%+10%9%0.6×-7.6%+11.1%
Kinko Optical 6209.TWTaiwan$359M-5%+67%11%2.6×n/an/a
Apex International 4927.TWTaiwan$359M-24%-10%-22%1.8×n/an/a
CMK 6958.TJapan$270M0%+13%4%0.6×n/an/a
Trigiant 1300.HKHong Kong$368M-1%+26%12%1.1×-13.0%-2.4%
Korea Electric Terminal 025540.KSSouth Korea$369M-45%-4%8%0.2×n/an/a
Singatron Electronic (China) 301329.SZChina$372M-35%+37%5%1.7×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are iBASE Technology's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: ComNav Technology (688592.SS), BH Co., Ltd. (090460.KS), DK Tech (290550.KS), Kenmec Mechanical Engineering (6125.TWO), Tamura (6768.T), Axiomtek (3088.TWO), Taiwan PCB Techvest (8213.TW), Kaimei Electronic (2375.TW).
Is iBASE Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 2.4× against a peer median of 1.1×, 6th most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has iBASE Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +16.6% against -20.6% for the median peer; over one year +3.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.