Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 688518.SS Shenzhen United Winners Laser Co.,Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Shenzhen United Winners Laser Co.,Ltd. Class A688518.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Electronic Components

Chinese maker of laser processing equipment used in electronics and materials manufacturing.

Momentum leader 89
Mkt cap
$1.12B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
71%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$37.4M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
22.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-6.4 pp
WACC 11.5%
Hurdle
+1 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
165 days
20 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥21.93
1D+0.1%
1W+30.7%
1M+13.0%
3M+17.9%
6M-23.5%
YTD-9.7%
1Y-12.2%
ATR %5.3%
52w lowhigh34.8% off high

What Shenzhen United Winners Laser does

Chinese maker of laser processing equipment used in electronics and materials manufacturing.

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrial equipment
  • Laser processing machinery

Moat: none

Headquarters: Shenzhen, China · Employees: 5,614

Shenzhen United Winners Laser at a glance

Size Shenzhen United Winners Laser (688518.SS) is a China Information Technology company (Electronic Components) with a market value of $1.12B, the 2079th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥21.93 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 23.5%, against -22.1% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 11th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 23.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +20.9%); the operating margin is 4.7% (peer median 7.5%).

Valuation It trades at 22.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 18.2× (5th most expensive of 10).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 31% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +30%, so the hurdle is +1 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 6.4 points below its cost of capital (11.5% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 20 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

7510012511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 77688518.SS 77
Six months, rebased to 100: Shenzhen United Winners Laser against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Shenzhen United Winners Laser financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥3.95BCN¥3.25BCN¥3.14BCN¥3.49BCN¥2.80B
Revenue growth—+3%-10%+25%—
Gross profitCN¥1.06BCN¥861MCN¥909MCN¥1.09BCN¥965M
EBITDACN¥282MCN¥182MCN¥189MCN¥266MCN¥264M
Net incomeCN¥309MCN¥167MCN¥166MCN¥286MCN¥267M
Free cash flowCN¥121M-CN¥146M-CN¥442MCN¥82.3M-CN¥488M
Capital expenditureCN¥113MCN¥231MCN¥324MCN¥159MCN¥293M
Total debtCN¥1.08BCN¥1.09BCN¥1.05BCN¥801MCN¥688M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Shenzhen United Winners Laser competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-40%-20%0%3163301366301680309000781060505868832530085260393662717861300098043260300739300790300303002897301328603267688518.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Shenzhen United Winners Laser is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%+20%+30%20×40×60×316330900078106271300098300790002897301328603267688518.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Shenzhen United Winners Laser is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%0%20%40%60%309060505862717861300098300303000058002897603267688518.SSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Shenzhen United Winners Laser is the large dot.

Shenzhen United Winners Laser competitors and peer comparison

How Shenzhen United Winners Laser compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Shenzhen United Winners Laser against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure688518.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+13.0%-19.9%highest of 21
6-month return-23.5%-22.1%11th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-34.8%-49.8%2nd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+23.5%+20.9%9th highest of 21
Operating margin4.7%7.5%6th lowest of 21
Forward P/E22.5×18.2×5th most expensive of 10
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)31.2%17.8%3rd most demanding of 10
Growth delivered (Del g)+30.1%+8.1%2nd highest of 10
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+1.0 pp+5.0 pp4th least demanding of 10
ROIC minus cost of capital-6.4 pp-2.1 pp6th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA24.1×18.0×2nd most expensive of 5
Net debt / EBITDA-2.5×-0.4×2nd least indebted of 6

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Shenzhen United Winners Laser 688518.SSChina$1.12B-23%+23%5%22.5×31.2%+30.1%
Browave 3163.TWOTaiwan$1.13B-62%+21%4%66.3×n/an/a
Shenzhen Edadoc Technology 301366.SZChina$1.13B+18%+51%12%n/an/an/a
Goode EIS (Suzhou) 301680.SZChina$1.09B-16%+68%18%n/an/an/a
Nichidenbo 3090.TWTaiwan$1.09B+15%+28%-5%12.0×57.2%+11.2%
Korea Circuit 007810.KSSouth Korea$1.09B-36%+21%6%15.1×n/an/a
Changzhou Aohong Electronics 605058.SSChina$1.08B+46%+21%15%n/a8.1%+8.9%
Guangdong Cellwise Microelectronics 688325.SSChina$1.18B-24%+18%7%n/an/an/a
Sihui Fuji Electronics Technology 300852.SZChina$1.18B+8%+48%13%n/an/an/a
Bomin Electronics 603936.SSChina$1.18B-21%+19%1%n/an/an/a
Tong Hsing Electronic Industries ,Ltd 6271.TWTaiwan$1.06B-5%+5%17%13.5×7.6%+2.6%
Bellwether Electronic 7861.TWOTaiwan$1.20B-31%+113%30%n/a17.8%+53.7%
Gosuncn Technology 300098.SZChina$1.04B-27%+20%-3%50.1×33.2%-3.1%
Sungho Electronics 043260.KSSouth Korea$1.04B-54%+44%4%n/an/an/a
Sunshine Global Circuits 300739.SZChina$1.22B-19%+36%7%n/an/an/a
Dongguan YuTong Optical Technology 300790.SZChina$1.23B-24%+21%8%18.2×n/an/a
Shenzhen Jufei Optoelectronics 300303.SZChina$1.23B-35%+2%5%n/a18.0%+8.1%
Shenzhen SEG 000058.SZChina$1.02B-20%-1%9%n/a9.7%+5.3%
Wenzhou Yihua Connector 002897.SZChina$1.24B-26%-7%6%16.9×15.2%+14.4%
WCON Electronics 301328.SZChina$986M-3%+34%16%44.6×n/an/a
Beijing Yuanliu Hongyuan Electronic Technology 603267.SSChina$1.28B-30%-2%8%25.5×24.4%+1.1%

Questions

Which companies are Shenzhen United Winners Laser's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Browave (3163.TWO), Shenzhen Edadoc Technology (301366.SZ), Goode EIS (Suzhou) (301680.SZ), Nichidenbo (3090.TW), Korea Circuit (007810.KS), Changzhou Aohong Electronics (605058.SS), Guangdong Cellwise Microelectronics (688325.SS), Sihui Fuji Electronics Technology (300852.SZ).
Is Shenzhen United Winners Laser expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 22.5× against a peer median of 18.2×, 5th most expensive of 10 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 31% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +30%, so the hurdle is +1 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Shenzhen United Winners Laser stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -23.5% against -22.1% for the median peer; over one year -12.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.