Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 688209.SS Shenzhen Injoinic Technology Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Shenzhen Injoinic Technology Co., Ltd. Class A688209.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Semiconductors

Shenzhen-based designer of fast-charging protocol and power-management chips for phone chargers and power banks.

≈ A niche Chinese fast-charging chipmakerMomentum leader 93
Mkt cap
$1.64B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
38%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$56.4M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-2.6 pp
WACC 12.5%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥25.41
1D-4.2%
1W+13.3%
1M-12.6%
3M+28.2%
6M+4.7%
YTD+27.4%
1Y+14.2%
ATR %8.8%
52w lowhigh34.6% off high

What Shenzhen Injoinic Technology does

Shenzhen-based designer of fast-charging protocol and power-management chips for phone chargers and power banks.

Fabless: it designs chips and outsources their manufacture, then sells them to power-bank and charger makers, so volume follows unit sales of those accessories. Competition in charging chips puts steady pressure on prices.

In one line: A niche Chinese fast-charging chipmaker.

Products and services

  • Fast-charging protocol chips
  • Power bank management ICs
  • USB-PD/charger ICs

Customers

  • Phone charger and power-bank OEMs
  • Smartphone accessory brands

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information Technology
  • Semiconductors
  • Power management ICs

What could go right

  • Fast-charging adoption in phones/power banks

What could go wrong

  • Intense domestic price competition
  • Component commoditization

Moat: narrow (process know-how). Protocol-compatibility expertise in a crowded, price-competitive charging-IC niche.

Headquarters: Shenzhen, China · Founded: 2010 · Employees: 765

Named competitors

Shenzhen Injoinic Technology at a glance

Size Shenzhen Injoinic Technology (688209.SS) is a China Information Technology company (Semiconductors) with a market value of $1.64B, the 1512th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥25.41 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 4.7%, against -18.7% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 4th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 12.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +19.0%); the operating margin is 10.6% (peer median 7.1%).

Valuation It trades at 5.8× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 4.6× (9th most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.6 points below its cost of capital (12.5% WACC).

Relative performance

7510012515011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026688209.SS 106Peer median 78
Six months, rebased to 100: Shenzhen Injoinic Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Shenzhen Injoinic Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥1.78BCN¥1.60BCN¥1.42BCN¥1.21BCN¥863M
Revenue growth—+12%+18%+40%—
Gross profitCN¥670MCN¥525MCN¥452MCN¥358MCN¥334M
EBITDAn/aCN¥157MCN¥96.5M-CN¥3.63MCN¥115M
Net incomeCN¥265MCN¥178MCN¥124MCN¥29.4MCN¥155M
Free cash flow-CN¥94.8M-CN¥17.6MCN¥174MCN¥15.5M-CN¥98.9M
Capital expenditureCN¥104MCN¥69.1MCN¥69.8MCN¥37.4MCN¥59.7M
Total debtCN¥85.5MCN¥87.1MCN¥15.4MCN¥14.1MCN¥12.6M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Shenzhen Injoinic Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+200%+400%-50%0%+50%+100%688552429A6882333000776881076278SHLS3001182466AMS8150688209.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Shenzhen Injoinic Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%+150%0×10×20×688552429A68823330007768810724416278030530SHLS6885353001186885032466SILEX688593125630062467688209.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Shenzhen Injoinic Technology is the large dot.

Shenzhen Injoinic Technology competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (688209.SS vs 688484.SS vs 6415.TW vs TXN)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
Shenzhen Injoinic Technology 688209.SS$1.64B+5%+13%11%5.8×n/a
Southchip Semiconductor Technology (Shanghai) 688484.SS$1.95B-21%+9%-2%3.7×n/a
Silergy 6415.TW$4.58B-11%+13%12%6.7×n/a
Texas Instruments TXN$253B-4%+20%41%12.5×23.3%

How Shenzhen Injoinic Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Shenzhen Injoinic Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure688209.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-12.6%-18.6%8th highest of 20
6-month return+4.7%-18.7%4th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-34.6%-46.3%4th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+12.9%+19.0%9th lowest of 21
Operating margin10.6%7.1%8th highest of 21
EV / Sales5.8×4.6×9th most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-2.6 pp-7.2 pp8th highest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Shenzhen Injoinic Technology 688209.SSChina$1.64B+5%+13%11%5.8×n/an/a
Aerospace Nanhu Electronic Information Technology 688552.SSChina$1.64B-19%+19%-6%11.0×35.8%+1.0%
Tekscend Photomask 429A.TJapan$1.64B-36%+10%22%1.6×6.4%+8.7%
Thinkon Semiconductor Jinzhou 688233.SSChina$1.62B-11%+12%18%22.0×44.7%+18.0%
NSING Technologies 300077.SZChina$1.61B-32%+47%1%6.5×n/an/a
Shanghai Anlogic Infotech 688107.SSChina$1.67B-26%+70%-25%11.1×n/an/a
Greatek Electronics 2441.TWTaiwan$1.68B+4%+24%21%2.5×1.6%+2.7%
Taiwan Surface Mounting Technology 6278.TWTaiwan$1.60B-2%+5%7%0.8×6.5%+3.8%
Wonik 030530.KSSouth Korea$1.59B-14%-14%1%4.8×n/an/a
Shoals Technologies SHLSUnited States$1.70B+14%+49%11%2.9×n/an/a
Jiangsu HHCK Advanced Materials 688535.SSChina$1.58B-19%+154%7%11.2×n/an/a
Risen Energy 300118.SZChina$1.71B-42%-52%-39%3.1×38.4%-4.7%
Changzhou Fusion New Material 688503.SSChina$1.71B-53%+41%2%1.0×n/an/a
Cosmo Electronics 2466.TWTaiwan$1.57B+449%-19%-20%58.9×n/an/a
Silex Microsystems SILEX.STSweden$1.55B-32%+13%26%10.3×38.0%+13.0%
Shanghai New Vision Microelectronics 688593.SSChina$1.76B-22%+7%-4%17.2×n/an/a
ams-OSRAM AMS.SWSwitzerland$1.78B-16%-3%8%0.9×n/an/a
Beijing ESWIN Computing Technology 1256.HKHong Kong$1.50Bn/a+20%-57%4.4×n/an/a
Elite Semiconductor Microelectronics Technology 3006.TWTaiwan$1.79B+14%+273%49%0.7×n/an/a
ChipMOS Technologies 8150.TWTaiwan$1.49B-17%+19%8%2.0×n/an/a
C Sun Mfg 2467.TWTaiwan$1.48B-47%+72%22%5.2×12.7%+8.4%

Questions

Who are Shenzhen Injoinic Technology's main competitors?
Named competitors: Southchip Semiconductor Technology (688484.SS), Silergy (6415.TW), Texas Instruments (TXN), Richtek Technology (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Aerospace Nanhu Electronic Information Technology (688552.SS), Tekscend Photomask (429A.T), Thinkon Semiconductor Jinzhou (688233.SS), NSING Technologies (300077.SZ), Shanghai Anlogic Infotech (688107.SS), Greatek Electronics (2441.TW).
Is Shenzhen Injoinic Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 5.8× against a peer median of 4.6×, 9th most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Shenzhen Injoinic Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +4.7% against -18.7% for the median peer; over one year +14.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.