Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 688198.SS Beijing Balance Medical Technology Co. Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Beijing Balance Medical Technology Co. Ltd. Class A688198.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Health Care›Medical Specialties

Chinese maker of animal-tissue heart valves, congenital heart disease implants and soft-tissue repair products.

Momentum neutral 47
Mkt cap
$1.47B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
22%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$3.92M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
46.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+8.3 pp
WACC 6.4%
Hurdle
-5 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
167 days
22 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥71.26
1D-1.8%
1W-1.6%
1M+5.4%
3M-14.8%
6M-26.3%
YTD-33.4%
1Y-33.2%
ATR %3.5%
52w lowhigh46.4% off high

What Beijing Balance Medical Technology does

Chinese maker of animal-tissue heart valves, congenital heart disease implants and soft-tissue repair products.

Sells implants made from treated animal tissue, mainly artificial heart valves from cow-heart-sac membrane or pig aorta, plus implants for children with congenital heart defects, to hospitals. Surgeons choose by clinical record, and prices follow hospital procurement rules. It is extending the tissue-treatment know-how into soft-tissue and collagen products.

Products and services

  • Bioprosthetic heart valves (bovine pericardium, porcine aort
  • Congenital heart disease interventional implants
  • Surgical soft-tissue repair products
  • Collagen implants

Customers

  • Cardiac surgery and cardiology hospitals
  • Cardiac surgeons

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Healthcare
  • Medical devices
  • Animal-tissue cardiac implants

What could go right

  • Heart-valve replacement demand in China
  • New collagen-implant line

What could go wrong

  • Device price cuts
  • Hospital procurement pressure

Moat: narrow (IP / patents, regulatory licence). Animal-tissue treatment know-how (anti-rejection, anti-calcification) and device approvals; surgeons' familiarity with the valves.

Headquarters: Beijing, China · Employees: 746

Named competitors

Beijing Balance Medical Technology at a glance

Size Beijing Balance Medical Technology (688198.SS) is a China Health Care company (Medical Specialties) with a market value of $1.47B, the 1661st largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥71.26 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 26.3%, against +8.0% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 10.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.9%); the operating margin is 28.3% (peer median 7.0%).

Valuation It trades at 46.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 21.3× (4th most expensive of 17).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 23% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +28%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 8.3 points above its cost of capital (6.4% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 22 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 110688198.SS 72
Six months, rebased to 100: Beijing Balance Medical Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Beijing Balance Medical Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥653MCN¥614MCN¥500MCN¥370MCN¥294M
Revenue growth—+23%+35%+26%—
Gross profitCN¥593MCN¥509MCN¥419MCN¥319MCN¥258M
EBITDAn/aCN¥230MCN¥156MCN¥113MCN¥88.8M
Net incomeCN¥177MCN¥194MCN¥146MCN¥115MCN¥95.1M
Free cash flowCN¥17.0MCN¥72.6M-CN¥13.8MCN¥25.7MCN¥42.9M
Capital expenditureCN¥125MCN¥136MCN¥163MCN¥129MCN¥105M
Total debtCN¥194MCN¥93.6MCN¥9.79MCN¥12.3MCN¥1.40M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Beijing Balance Medical Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%0%+50%688758ELN3005957716300633CNMDNVCRENOV300298688289VITR2675268ACHEMMBFLYDRTS688198.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Beijing Balance Medical Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%0×50×100×688758ELN3005957716300633CNMD688289688016VITR2675CHEMM688198.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Beijing Balance Medical Technology is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%+30%0%20%688758ELN3005957716CNMDENOV3002986880166849VITR268ACHEMM688198.SSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Beijing Balance Medical Technology is the large dot.

Beijing Balance Medical Technology competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (688198.SS vs EW vs MDT vs 1302.HK)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Beijing Balance Medical Technology 688198.SS$1.47B-26%+10%28%46.6×22.6%
Edwards Lifesciences EW$58.9B+28%+15%29%31.4×17.2%
Medtronic MDT$130B+35%+10%20%16.9×8.6%
LifeTech Scientific 1302.HK$914M-18%+1%12%23.5×13.3%

How Beijing Balance Medical Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Beijing Balance Medical Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure688198.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+5.4%-0.3%8th highest of 21
6-month return-26.3%+8.0%3rd lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-46.4%-21.2%3rd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+10.4%+4.9%9th highest of 20
Operating margin28.3%7.0%4th highest of 20
Forward P/E46.6×21.3×4th most expensive of 17
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)22.6%14.4%3rd most demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)+27.6%+15.5%highest of 13
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-5.0 pp+0.3 pp6th least demanding of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital+8.3 pp+0.1 pp5th highest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Beijing Balance Medical Technology 688198.SSChina$1.47B-26%+10%28%46.6×22.6%+27.6%
Suzhou Sepax Technologies 688758.SSChina$1.45B+19%+28%40%50.8×24.7%+23.6%
El.En ELN.MIItaly$1.44B+11%+3%15%21.8×9.8%+7.7%
Ovctek China 300595.SZChina$1.42B-26%0%28%20.8×9.9%+16.5%
Nakanishi 7716.TJapan$1.42B+8%+15%19%16.3×2.2%+19.7%
Sonoscape Medical 300633.SZChina$1.42B-8%+18%4%36.8×n/an/a
CONMED CNMDUnited States$1.53B+40%+2%2%11.1×32.4%+9.8%
NovoCure NVCRUnited States$1.55B-26%+13%-17%n/an/an/a
NIPRO 8086.TJapan$1.55B-9%+3%6%14.9×n/an/a
Enovis ENOVUnited States$1.57B+2%+5%3%7.7×22.3%-6.0%
Sinocare 300298.SZChina$1.58B+15%+7%6%23.6×10.8%+18.3%
Sansure Biotech 688289.SSChina$1.36B-8%-1%1%39.0×n/an/a
Shanghai MicroPort Endovascular MedTech 688016.SSChina$1.59B-14%+16%44%17.2×3.1%+23.4%
Nihon Kohden 6849.TJapan$1.63B+8%+1%7%17.6×-2.1%+3.3%
Vitrolife VITR.STSweden$1.63B+14%-2%19%27.6×22.0%+22.5%
Molbio Diagnostics MOLBIO.NSIndia$1.63Bn/a+35%17%n/an/an/a
Shenzhen Edge Medical 2675.HKHong Kong$1.31B-51%+132%2%130.1×n/an/a
Rigaku 268A.TJapan$1.66B-57%+5%15%20.4×18.8%+14.5%
ChemoMetec A/S CHEMM.CODenmark$1.69B+124%+3%49%52.0×17.9%+12.7%
Butterfly Network BFLYUnited States$1.70B+53%+39%-36%n/an/an/a
Alpha Tau Medical DRTSUnited States$1.27B+61%n/an/an/an/an/a

Questions

Who are Beijing Balance Medical Technology's main competitors?
Named competitors: Edwards Lifesciences (EW), Medtronic (MDT), Venus Medtech (private or unlisted), Lifetech Scientific (1302.HK). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Suzhou Sepax Technologies (688758.SS), El.En (ELN.MI), Ovctek China (300595.SZ), Nakanishi (7716.T), Sonoscape Medical (300633.SZ), CONMED (CNMD).
Is Beijing Balance Medical Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 46.6× against a peer median of 21.3×, 4th most expensive of 17 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 23% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +28%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Beijing Balance Medical Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -26.3% against +8.0% for the median peer; over one year -33.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.