Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 268A.T Rigaku Holdings CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Rigaku Holdings Corporation268A.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Health Care›Medical Specialties

Japanese maker of X-ray analysis and diffraction instruments used in materials research and semiconductor labs.

≈ A niche scientific-instruments maker like a smaller BrukerMomentum laggard 0
Mkt cap
$1.66B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
59%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$19.9M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
20.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-1.1 pp
WACC 8.7%
Hurdle
+4 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
5 days
11 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥1,155
1D-8.5%
1W-24.6%
1M-39.0%
3M-45.9%
6M-57.2%
YTD-5.9%
1Y+18.2%
ATR %8.9%
52w lowhigh66.0% off high

What Rigaku does

Japanese maker of X-ray analysis and diffraction instruments used in materials research and semiconductor labs.

Sells costly analytical instruments to labs and factories, and earns repeat income from consumables, service and software on the installed base. Chipmakers' metrology needs and research budgets drive orders. It listed in 2024 after a period of private-equity ownership.

In one line: A niche scientific-instruments maker like a smaller Bruker.

Products and services

  • X-ray diffraction instruments
  • X-ray fluorescence analyzers
  • Thermal analysis instruments

Customers

  • Materials/semiconductor research labs
  • Universities
  • Pharmaceutical companies

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Scientific instruments
  • X-ray diffraction/fluorescence…

What could go right

  • Semiconductor/battery materials R&D spend

What could go wrong

  • Research budget cyclicality

Moat: narrow (process know-how, brand). Specialized X-ray analysis expertise and instrument brand recognition among materials scientists.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 1951 · Employees: 1,971

Named competitors

  • Bruker BRKR
  • JEOL 6951.T
  • Malvern Panalytical private or unlisted

Rigaku at a glance

Size Rigaku (268A.T) is a Japan Health Care company (Medical Specialties) with a market value of $1.66B, the 538th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥1,155 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 57.2%, against +2.4% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 4.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +12.1%); the operating margin is 15.3% (peer median 9.7%).

Valuation It trades at 20.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 25.2× (8th cheapest of 17).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 19% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +15%, so the hurdle is +4 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.1 points below its cost of capital (8.7% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 11 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

507510012511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 103268A.T 43
Six months, rebased to 100: Rigaku against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Rigaku financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥93.0B¥94.2B¥90.7B¥79.9B¥62.7B
Revenue growth—+4%+13%+27%—
Gross profit¥51.8B¥48.9B¥51.3B¥43.1B¥34.4B
EBITDA¥19.7B¥22.4B¥23.4B¥19.8B¥15.2B
Net income¥9.25B¥11.4B¥13.6B¥10.9B¥911M
Free cash flow¥640M¥3.56B¥8.74B¥8.94B¥4.67B
Capital expenditure¥5.59B¥6.65B¥6.36B¥2.83B¥2.72B
Total debt¥66.9B¥62.2B¥61.6B¥62.1B¥63.3B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Rigaku competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%0%+50%CHEMMVITR6849BFLY301087KMTS688016POLYMED3002986960ENOVNVCR688531CNMDMED300049268A.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Rigaku is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+25%+50%+75%20×40×60×CHEMMVITR6849301087688016POLYMED6699300298EMBLA6960ENOV688531CNMDMED300049268A.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Rigaku is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%+30%0%20%CHEMMVITR68493010876880166699300298EMBLA6960ENOVCNMD300049268A.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Rigaku is the large dot.

Rigaku competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (268A.T vs BRKR vs 6951.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Rigaku 268A.T$1.66B-57%+5%15%20.4×18.8%
Bruker BRKR$9.34B+39%+2%9%26.2×25.7%
JEOL 6951.T$1.98B-3%-18%11%14.2×21.3%

How Rigaku compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Rigaku against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure268A.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-39.0%+2.5%lowest of 21
6-month return-57.2%+2.4%lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-66.0%-21.1%lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+4.9%+12.1%8th lowest of 21
Operating margin15.3%9.7%8th highest of 21
Forward P/E20.4×25.2×8th cheapest of 17
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)18.8%11.7%4th most demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)+14.5%+11.3%6th highest of 13
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+4.2 pp-3.8 pp5th most demanding of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital-1.1 pp-0.0 pp11th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA15.3×22.7×5th cheapest of 12
Net debt / EBITDA2.0×0.9×6th most indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Rigaku 268A.TJapan$1.66B-57%+5%15%20.4×18.8%+14.5%
ChemoMetec A/S CHEMM.CODenmark$1.69B+124%+3%49%52.0×17.9%+12.7%
Molbio Diagnostics MOLBIO.NSIndia$1.63Bn/a+35%17%n/an/an/a
Vitrolife VITR.STSweden$1.63B+14%-2%19%27.6×22.0%+22.5%
Nihon Kohden 6849.TJapan$1.63B+8%+1%7%17.6×-2.1%+3.3%
Butterfly Network BFLYUnited States$1.70B+53%+39%-36%n/an/an/a
Cofoe Medical Technology 301087.SZChina$1.71B-5%+33%10%26.9×12.5%+7.4%
Kestra Medical Technologies KMTSUnited States$1.72B+37%+61%-134%n/an/an/a
Shanghai MicroPort Endovascular MedTech 688016.SSChina$1.59B-14%+16%44%17.2×3.1%+23.4%
Poly Medicure POLYMED.NSIndia$1.73B-4%+18%17%40.6×n/an/a
Angelalign Technology 6699.HKHong Kong$1.74B-7%+84%9%52.1×18.1%+25.8%
Sinocare 300298.SZChina$1.58B+15%+7%6%23.6×10.8%+18.3%
Embla Medical hf EMBLA.CODenmark$1.75B+3%+6%14%17.9×-1.8%+8.3%
Fukuda Denshi 6960.TJapan$1.75B-5%0%19%14.6×-3.2%-1.0%
Enovis ENOVUnited States$1.57B+2%+5%3%7.7×22.3%-6.0%
NIPRO 8086.TJapan$1.55B-9%+3%6%14.9×n/an/a
NovoCure NVCRUnited States$1.55B-26%+13%-17%n/an/an/a
Wuxi Unicomp Technology 688531.SSChina$1.80B-36%+53%12%40.7×n/an/a
CONMED CNMDUnited States$1.53B+40%+2%2%11.1×32.4%+9.8%
Medartis MED.SWSwitzerland$1.83B+47%+30%2%74.2×n/an/a
Inner Mongolia Furui Medical Science 300049.SZChina$1.85B-5%+11%25%53.2×6.6%+14.6%

Questions

Who are Rigaku's main competitors?
Named competitors: Bruker (BRKR), JEOL (6951.T), Malvern Panalytical (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes ChemoMetec A/S (CHEMM.CO), Molbio Diagnostics (MOLBIO.NS), Vitrolife (VITR.ST), Nihon Kohden (6849.T), Butterfly Network (BFLY), Cofoe Medical Technology (301087.SZ).
Is Rigaku expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 20.4× against a peer median of 25.2×, 8th cheapest of 17 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 19% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +15%, so the hurdle is +4 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Rigaku stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -57.2% against +2.4% for the median peer; over one year +18.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.