Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 6841.T Yokogawa Electric CorpOpen in the cockpit ↗

Yokogawa Electric Corp6841.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Electronic Equipment/Instruments

Makes industrial measurement and control systems used in process manufacturing plants.

≈ Japan's Emerson Process Management/Honeywell Process SolutionsMomentum laggard 6
Mkt cap
$6.24B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
82%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$39.9M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
15.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+4.1 pp
WACC 11.3%
Hurdle
-3 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
95 days
9 Feb 2027
Close · JPY¥3,850
1D-4.6%
1W-16.8%
1M-18.8%
3M-32.5%
6M-29.5%
YTD-22.5%
1Y-15.2%
ATR %4.5%
52w lowhigh38.5% off high

What Yokogawa Electric does

Makes industrial measurement and control systems used in process manufacturing plants.

Earns from project sales of control systems for new plants and upgrades, then from years of maintenance, spare parts and system updates on installed systems that can run for decades. Most sales come from outside Japan.

In one line: Japan's Emerson Process Management/Honeywell Process Solutions.

Products and services

  • Distributed control systems
  • Field instrumentation (sensors)
  • Plant automation software

Customers

  • Oil & gas/chemical plants
  • Power/utility operators

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrial automation
  • Process control systems manufacturing
  • Instrumentation + control systems

What could go right

  • Energy transition plant investment
  • Digitalization of process industries

What could go wrong

  • Oil & gas capex cyclicality

Moat: narrow (switching costs, installed base, process know-how). Once installed, plant control systems are costly and risky for customers to replace.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 1915 · Employees: 18,313

Named competitors

Yokogawa Electric at a glance

Size Yokogawa Electric (6841.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Electronic Equipment/Instruments) with a market value of $6.24B, the 203rd largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥3,850 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 29.5%, against -12.6% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 2nd lowest of 15 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 7.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.9%); the operating margin is 12.8% (peer median 15.2%).

Valuation It trades at 15.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 20.5× (3rd cheapest of 15).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +10%, so the hurdle is -3 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.1 points above its cost of capital (11.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 9 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 876841.T 71
Six months, rebased to 100: Yokogawa Electric against the median of its 14 peers (local-currency closes).

Yokogawa Electric financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥621B¥605B¥562B¥540B¥456B
Revenue growth—+8%+4%+18%—
Gross profit¥283B¥276B¥268B¥255B¥205B
EBITDA¥105B¥108B¥106B¥101B¥64.1B
Net income¥51.8B¥58.1B¥52.1B¥61.7B¥38.9B
Free cash flown/a¥74.8B¥88.2B¥55.1B¥31.8B
Capital expendituren/a¥27.7B¥26.9B¥24.1B¥20.8B
Total debt¥24.2B¥34.2B¥34.1B¥32.9B¥57.1B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Yokogawa Electric competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%+20%APARINDSMSASTESE3969RAL6845003670POWERINDIAHONAUTSXI1503NXTFTV6841.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Yokogawa Electric is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%0×100×200×300×APARINDSMSASTESERAL003670POWERINDIAHONAUTSXIFTV6841.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Yokogawa Electric is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%MSASTESE3969RAL6845POWERINDIAHONAUTSXI1503NXTFTV6841.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Yokogawa Electric is the large dot.

Yokogawa Electric competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (6841.T vs EMR vs HON vs ABBN.SW)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Yokogawa Electric 6841.T$6.24B-30%+7%13%15.5×6.8%
Emerson Electric EMR$90.6B+15%+5%21%22.3×19.9%
Honeywell Technologies HON$69.8B-1%-17%18%23.2×4.1%
ABB ABBN.SW$147B-17%+1%18%24.5×4.3%

How Yokogawa Electric compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Yokogawa Electric against its 14 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure6841.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-18.8%-8.6%3rd lowest of 15
6-month return-29.5%-12.6%2nd lowest of 15
Distance from 52-week high-38.5%-27.3%3rd lowest of 15
Revenue growth (TTM)+7.5%+6.9%8th highest of 15
Operating margin12.8%15.2%6th lowest of 15
Forward P/E15.5×20.5×3rd cheapest of 15
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)6.8%16.2%4th least demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)+10.1%+6.6%3rd highest of 13
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-3.3 pp+6.4 ppleast demanding of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital+4.1 pp+1.8 pp7th highest of 15
EV / EBITDA7.9×17.6×cheapest of 13
Net debt / EBITDA-1.6×0.0×3rd least indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Yokogawa Electric 6841.TJapan$6.24B-30%+7%13%15.5×6.8%+10.1%
APAR Industries APARINDS.NSIndia$6.25B+10%+23%9%34.6×n/an/a
MSA Safety MSAUnited States$6.55B0%+8%22%17.5×8.3%+6.8%
Sensata Technologies STUnited States$5.72B-13%+4%16%9.9×5.2%+4.1%
ESCO Technologies ESEUnited States$7.14B-24%+17%16%25.8×25.5%+8.4%
China Railway Signal & Communication 3969.HKHong Kong$7.40B-15%+6%12%7.4×-6.9%-3.6%
Ralliant RALUnited States$7.49B+43%-4%15%19.2×20.5%-0.3%
Azbil 6845.TJapan$4.63B-2%+1%15%18.7×5.5%+3.9%
Posco Future M 003670.KSSouth Korea$10.6B-36%-9%2%282.1×n/an/a
Hitachi Energy India POWERINDIA.NSIndia$13.1B-20%+40%15%79.8×50.3%+19.0%
Honeywell Automation India HONAUT.NSIndia$2.81B-2%+5%13%39.5×32.9%+9.2%
Standex International SXIUnited States$2.76B-13%+8%18%20.9×15.2%+6.3%
Shihlin Electric & Engineering 1503.TWTaiwan$2.51B-20%+8%12%18.9×11.5%+7.7%
NXT NXTUnited States$15.8B-17%+14%19%20.9×22.0%+24.4%
Fortive FTVUnited States$19.5B+8%-22%20%20.0×17.2%-2.1%

Questions

Who are Yokogawa Electric's main competitors?
Named competitors: Emerson Electric (EMR), Honeywell (HON), ABB (ABBN.SW). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes APAR Industries (APARINDS.NS), MSA Safety (MSA), Sensata Technologies (ST), ESCO Technologies (ESE), China Railway Signal & Communication (3969.HK), Ralliant (RAL).
Is Yokogawa Electric expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 15.5× against a peer median of 20.5×, 3rd cheapest of 15 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +10%, so the hurdle is -3 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Yokogawa Electric stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -29.5% against -12.6% for the median peer; over one year -15.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.