Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 6564.T Midac Holdings Co. Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Midac Holdings Co. Ltd.6564.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Trucking
Momentum weak 27
Mkt cap
$326M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
35%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$473,843
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
14.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+7.9 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
7 days
13 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥1,861
1D-4.4%
1W-3.6%
1M-7.1%
3M-12.3%
6M-12.2%
YTD-3.1%
1Y-2.8%
ATR %3.0%
52w lowhigh20.6% off high

What Midac does

Employees: 364

Midac at a glance

Size Midac (6564.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Trucking) with a market value of $326M, the 1310th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥1,861 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 12.2%, against -10.7% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 9th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 13.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.4%); the operating margin is 39.7% (peer median 5.1%).

Valuation It trades at 14.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.2× (7th most expensive of 14).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 7.9 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 13 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 896564.T 88
Six months, rebased to 100: Midac against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Midac financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥12.4B¥11.8B¥10.9B¥9.55B¥7.77B
Revenue growth—+9%+14%+23%—
Gross profit¥7.33B¥6.91B¥6.45B¥5.61B¥4.39B
EBITDA¥6.16B¥5.90B¥5.51B¥4.47B¥3.56B
Net income¥2.99B¥2.89B¥2.86B¥1.91B¥1.69B
Free cash flown/a-¥4.58B¥783M¥798M¥877M
Capital expendituren/a¥7.59B¥3.48B¥1.88B¥2.00B
Total debt¥13.8B¥13.1B¥9.32B¥10.5B¥8.03B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Midac competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-25%0%+25%+50%+75%-20%0%+20%00120290282608301068001228FWRD001317VRLLOG300867600650ULH9304603686HTLD903990686564.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Midac is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%-10%0%+10%+20%0×50×100×150×90283010689369FWRDVRLLOG300867TCIULH603686HTLD6564.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Midac is the large dot.

Midac competitors and peer comparison

How Midac compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Midac against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure6564.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-7.1%-5.0%10th lowest of 21
6-month return-12.2%-10.7%9th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-20.6%-31.9%7th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+13.5%+3.4%4th highest of 21
Operating margin39.7%5.1%highest of 21
Forward P/E14.8×14.2×7th most expensive of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital+7.9 pp-0.3 pp2nd highest of 21
EV / EBITDA9.7×9.0×4th most expensive of 13
Net debt / EBITDA1.3×1.7×6th least indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Midac 6564.TJapan$326M-12%+14%40%14.8×n/an/a
Jushen Logistics 001202.SZChina$315M-26%+16%6%n/an/an/a
Zero 9028.TJapan$311M-11%+2%7%6.7×-19.2%+10.3%
Kerry TJ Logistics 2608.TWTaiwan$391M-8%-1%12%n/a-5.0%+0.8%
Hangzhou Dadi Haiyang Environmental Protection 301068.SZChina$409M-45%+25%3%15.7×16.2%+23.5%
K.R.S.Corporation 9369.TJapan$441M-9%+4%3%32.4×n/an/a
Yongtaiyun Chemical Logistics 001228.SZChina$481M+7%+31%5%n/an/an/a
Forward Air FWRDUnited States$562M+69%0%3%153.6×17.1%+14.5%
San Yang Ma (Chongqing) Logistics 001317.SZChina$606M-11%-51%4%n/a35.8%+7.1%
VRL Logistics VRLLOG.NSIndia$624M+27%+11%14%16.1×6.2%+12.8%
Shengyuan Environmental Protection 300867.SZChina$638M-24%+3%28%11.8×-4.1%+8.5%
Transport Corporation of India TCI.NSIndia$700M-12%+12%8%14.2×14.9%+11.9%
Shanghai Jin Jiang Online Network Service 600650.SSChina$705M-14%-19%-2%n/a5.6%-10.8%
Universal Logistics ULHUnited States$715M+108%-7%4%13.9×n/an/a
Shibusawa Logistics 9304.TJapan$723M+48%+2%5%n/a16.9%+4.1%
Fulongma 603686.SSChina$743M-37%+6%6%27.8×2.4%-2.0%
Heartland Express HTLDUnited States$780M-24%-17%-6%28.2×n/an/a
Sakai Moving Service 9039.TJapan$785M+2%+4%10%13.7×-11.2%+4.5%
Covenant Logistics CVLGUnited States$801M-5%+12%1%12.3×n/an/a
Shanghai Juss Sports and Entertainment 600676.SSChina$802M-36%-14%-15%n/a5.1%-11.0%
Maruzen Showa Unyu 9068.TJapan$922M-15%+3%10%10.5×-7.4%+4.2%

Questions

Which companies are Midac's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Jushen Logistics (001202.SZ), Zero (9028.T), Kerry TJ Logistics (2608.TW), Hangzhou Dadi Haiyang Environmental Protection (301068.SZ), K.R.S.Corporation (9369.T), Yongtaiyun Chemical Logistics (001228.SZ), Forward Air (FWRD), San Yang Ma (Chongqing) Logistics (001317.SZ).
Is Midac expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 14.8× against a peer median of 14.2×, 7th most expensive of 14 in its peer set.
How has Midac stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -12.2% against -10.7% for the median peer; over one year -2.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.