Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 6507.T Sinfonia Technology Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Sinfonia Technology Co., Ltd.6507.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Electrical Products

Japanese maker of power electronics, motors and vibratory parts-feeding equipment for factory automation, rail and autos.

≈ A niche, smaller Parker Hannifin for motion and power controlMomentum laggard 2
Mkt cap
$1.56B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
62%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$19.1M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
14.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+0.6 pp
WACC 11.8%
Hurdle
+7 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · JPY¥8,720
1D-6.1%
1W-26.5%
1M-40.1%
3M-35.2%
6M-38.8%
YTD-3.9%
1Y-17.7%
ATR %9.9%
52w lowhigh48.4% off high

What Sinfonia Technology does

Japanese maker of power electronics, motors and vibratory parts-feeding equipment for factory automation, rail and autos.

In one line: A niche, smaller Parker Hannifin for motion and power control.

Products and services

  • Vibratory parts feeders
  • Railway traction inverters
  • Auto electric motors/actuators
  • Power supply systems

Customers

  • Auto parts assemblers
  • Railway/rolling-stock makers
  • Factory automation integrators

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrial automation
  • Power electronics & motion control
  • Motors, inverters, parts feeders

What could go right

  • Factory automation capex
  • Rail electrification projects

What could go wrong

  • Auto production cycles
  • Competition from larger electrical majors

Moat: narrow (process know-how, installed base). Long-run niche leadership in parts feeders and railway traction electronics.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Employees: 3,729

Named competitors

Sinfonia Technology at a glance

Size Sinfonia Technology (6507.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Electrical Products) with a market value of $1.56B, the 561st largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥8,720 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 38.8%, against -39.2% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 7th highest of 18 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 9.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +25.9%); the operating margin is 14.6% (peer median 8.6%).

Valuation It trades at 14.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 24.6× (4th cheapest of 14).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 15% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is +7 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.6 points above its cost of capital (11.8% WACC).

Relative performance

608010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20266507.T 61Peer median 60
Six months, rebased to 100: Sinfonia Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Sinfonia Technology financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥132B¥128B¥119B¥103B¥109B
Revenue growth—+8%+16%-6%—
Gross profit¥38.1B¥39.0B¥33.6B¥27.0B¥28.7B
EBITDA¥22.5B¥21.7B¥18.7B¥13.5B¥14.9B
Net income¥15.0B¥14.5B¥12.1B¥7.51B¥8.10B
Free cash flown/a¥5.61B¥8.40B¥3.11B¥2.23B
Capital expendituren/a¥7.44B¥3.29B¥7.24B¥4.08B
Total debt¥17.0B¥12.6B¥15.0B¥21.8B¥22.0B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Sinfonia Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-50%-25%0%301389000070301292688143112610HPS-A1035906030633013622865INOXWIND0009013004463015106507.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Sinfonia Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%0×100×200×300×EROC301389301292688143112610HPS-A103590603063301362300913INOXWIND3004466507.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Sinfonia Technology is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+50%+100%0%50%100%EROC301389000070112610HPS-A28653004466002683015106507.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Sinfonia Technology is the large dot.

Sinfonia Technology competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (6507.T vs 6506.T vs 6508.T vs 6503.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Sinfonia Technology 6507.T$1.56B-39%+9%15%14.2×15.4%
Yaskawa Electric 6506.T$5.71B-38%+6%8%19.7×24.8%
Meidensha 6508.T$1.96B-20%+12%10%11.0×5.1%
Mitsubishi Electric 6503.T$59.9B-28%+12%10%17.1×13.2%

How Sinfonia Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Sinfonia Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure6507.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-40.1%-15.8%3rd lowest of 21
6-month return-38.8%-39.2%7th highest of 18
Distance from 52-week high-48.4%-62.4%4th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+9.0%+25.9%7th lowest of 21
Operating margin14.6%8.6%4th highest of 21
Forward P/E14.2×24.6×4th cheapest of 14
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)15.4%13.6%5th most demanding of 11
Growth delivered (Del g)+8.0%+18.4%3rd lowest of 11
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+7.4 pp-13.7 pp4th most demanding of 11
ROIC minus cost of capital+0.6 pp-4.2 pp9th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA11.2×15.4×3rd cheapest of 7
Net debt / EBITDA0.2×0.5×4th least indebted of 7

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Sinfonia Technology 6507.TJapan$1.56B-39%+9%15%14.2×15.4%+8.0%
Hangzhou Gold Electronic Equipment 301669.SZChina$1.56Bn/a+37%9%n/an/an/a
ERock EROCUnited States$1.56Bn/a+43%-19%35.8×12.5%+42.5%
Long Young Electronic (Kunshan) 301389.SZChina$1.55B-41%+103%17%55.4×46.5%+3.3%
Shenzhen SDG Information 000070.SZChina$1.55B-33%+27%-1%n/a28.4%-1.3%
Shandong Hi-tech Spring Material Technology 301292.SZChina$1.54B-46%+46%11%31.8×n/an/a
Beijing Victory Electric 001393.SZChina$1.53Bn/a+31%11%n/an/an/a
Yangtze Optical Electronic 688143.SSChina$1.59B+56%+25%2%296.7×n/an/a
Cswind 112610.KSSouth Korea$1.52B-31%-8%7%11.6×-0.5%+23.8%
Hammond Power Solutions HPS-A.TOCanada$1.60B-41%+51%11%13.7×9.4%+22.8%
Iljin Electric 103590.KSSouth Korea$1.52B-65%+24%9%11.2×n/an/a
Shenzhen Hopewind Electric 603063.SSChina$1.52B-50%-5%9%24.6×14.6%+12.3%
Up-Shine Lighting 301362.SZChina$1.50B-39%+15%7%29.5×n/an/a
Hainan Drinda New Energy Technology 2865.HKHong Kong$1.62B-65%+1%-13%n/a29.6%+53.8%
Shanghai Electric Wind Power 688660.SSChina$1.50B-39%+69%-6%n/an/an/a
Zhejiang Zhaolong Interconnect Technology Co. Limited 300913.SZChina$1.49B-45%+29%12%44.1×n/an/a
Inox Wind INOXWIND.NSIndia$1.49B-39%+17%15%15.4×n/an/a
Aerospace Hi-Tech 000901.SZChina$1.63B-43%-21%1%n/an/an/a
Aerospace Intelligent Manufacturing Technology 300446.SZChina$1.48B-38%-14%5%21.3×2.1%+133.1%
Guodian Nanjing Automation 600268.SSChina$1.48B-35%-5%9%15.2×-0.1%+13.9%
Googol Technology 301510.SZChina$1.65B-30%+66%21%n/a50.5%+14.1%

Questions

Who are Sinfonia Technology's main competitors?
Named competitors: Yaskawa Electric (6506.T), Meidensha (6508.T), Mitsubishi Electric (6503.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Hangzhou Gold Electronic Equipment (301669.SZ), ERock (EROC), Long Young Electronic (Kunshan) (301389.SZ), Shenzhen SDG Information (000070.SZ), Shandong Hi-tech Spring Material Technology (301292.SZ), Beijing Victory Electric (001393.SZ).
Is Sinfonia Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 14.2× against a peer median of 24.6×, 4th cheapest of 14 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 15% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is +7 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Sinfonia Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -38.8% against -39.2% for the median peer; over one year -17.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.