Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 6331.T Mitsubishi Kakoki Kaisha,Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Mitsubishi Kakoki Kaisha,Ltd.6331.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Engineering & Construction
Momentum laggard 13
Mkt cap
$376M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
79%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$5.49M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
8.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-0.1 pp
WACC 11.7%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
84 days
29 Jan 2027
Close · JPY¥2,532
1D-4.7%
1W-9.3%
1M-17.0%
3M-18.1%
6M-20.4%
YTD-21.5%
1Y-17.9%
ATR %4.0%
52w lowhigh39.4% off high

What Mitsubishi Kakoki Kaisha,Ltd does

Employees: 1,044

Mitsubishi Kakoki Kaisha,Ltd at a glance

Size Mitsubishi Kakoki Kaisha,Ltd (6331.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $376M, the 1218th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥2,532 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 20.4%, against -14.1% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 7th lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 25.4% over the last twelve months (peer median -5.8%); the operating margin is 10.9% (peer median 4.7%).

Valuation It trades at 8.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.8× (cheapest of 10).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.1 points below its cost of capital (11.7% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 29 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 856331.T 78
Six months, rebased to 100: Mitsubishi Kakoki Kaisha,Ltd against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Mitsubishi Kakoki Kaisha,Ltd financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥86.1B¥84.2B¥59.2B¥47.8B¥44.6B
Revenue growth—+42%+24%+7%—
Gross profit¥19.4B¥18.0B¥13.0B¥11.2B¥8.53B
EBITDA¥10.3B¥10.1B¥6.60B¥5.08B¥3.17B
Net income¥8.03B¥7.55B¥4.88B¥5.40B¥3.04B
Free cash flown/a-¥2.90B-¥4.39B-¥817M¥82.0M
Capital expendituren/a¥4.70B¥1.08B¥2.18B¥914M
Total debt¥16.9B¥5.50B¥3.30B¥3.30B¥3.30B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Mitsubishi Kakoki Kaisha,Ltd competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+200%+400%-20%0%+20%AHLUCONTTFIN18150030019755SWSOLAR002542MULTI3009890368009410PHOE6331.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Mitsubishi Kakoki Kaisha,Ltd is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-40%-20%0%+20%20×40×60×AHLUCONTTFIN0030019755SWSOLARMULTI002949SHA6331.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Mitsubishi Kakoki Kaisha,Ltd is the large dot.

Mitsubishi Kakoki Kaisha,Ltd competitors and peer comparison

How Mitsubishi Kakoki Kaisha,Ltd compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Mitsubishi Kakoki Kaisha,Ltd against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure6331.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-17.0%-7.1%4th lowest of 21
6-month return-20.4%-14.1%7th lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-39.4%-34.2%9th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+25.4%-5.8%2nd highest of 20
Operating margin10.9%4.7%3rd highest of 20
Forward P/E8.2×14.8×cheapest of 10
ROIC minus cost of capital-0.1 pp+0.0 pp9th lowest of 19
EV / EBITDA6.7×8.6×2nd cheapest of 7
Net debt / EBITDA0.9×1.0×5th least indebted of 10

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Mitsubishi Kakoki Kaisha,Ltd 6331.TJapan$376M-20%+25%11%8.2×n/an/a
Ahluwalia Contracts (India) AHLUCONT.NSIndia$375M-38%+12%6%15.4×23.4%+18.2%
Trevi Finanziaria Industriale TFIN.MIItaly$378M+68%-6%10%53.9×-2.8%+6.0%
Tekken 1815.TJapan$381M-2%-5%3%n/an/an/a
Zhongyan Technology 003001.SZChina$371M-16%-38%-30%62.1×8.7%-11.4%
OYO 9755.TJapan$370M-6%-2%5%13.2×-13.5%+9.0%
Sterling And Wilson Renewable Energy SWSOLAR.NSIndia$369M-32%-9%5%14.8×n/an/a
Hangzhou Freely Communication 603602.SSChina$386M-14%+11%-6%n/a-14.4%+18.7%
China Zhonghua Geotechnical Engineering 002542.SZChina$366M-23%-33%-83%n/an/an/a
Steady Energy STEADY.HEFinland$388Mn/an/an/an/an/an/a
Multiconsult MULTI.OLNorway$390M-17%+4%5%14.3×-5.8%+9.6%
LAY-OUT Planning Consultants 300989.SZChina$363M-24%-20%-34%n/an/an/a
Superland 0368.HKHong Kong$392M+405%-6%6%n/an/an/a
Taeyoung Engineering & Construction 009410.KSSouth Korea$360M-24%-35%9%n/a-6.1%-1.0%
Zhenhai Petrochemical Engineering 603637.SSChina$360M-39%-15%8%n/an/an/a
Nichireki 5011.TJapan$394M0%+1%8%13.2×n/an/a
Shenzhen Capol International & Associates 002949.SZChina$359M-15%-19%12%25.4×2.7%-8.7%
Shape Australia SHA.AXAustralia$395M-14%+30%3%13.2×-1.0%+16.6%
Phoenix Asia PHOEUnited States$395M+18%-2%-17%n/an/an/a
Chengdu Expressway 1785.HKHong Kong$395M-8%+2%27%n/an/an/a
CSD Water Service 603903.SSChina$357M-4%-9%-7%n/a-2.1%-8.8%

Questions

Which companies are Mitsubishi Kakoki Kaisha,Ltd's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Ahluwalia Contracts (India) (AHLUCONT.NS), Trevi Finanziaria Industriale (TFIN.MI), Tekken (1815.T), Zhongyan Technology (003001.SZ), OYO (9755.T), Sterling And Wilson Renewable Energy (SWSOLAR.NS), Hangzhou Freely Communication (603602.SS), China Zhonghua Geotechnical Engineering (002542.SZ).
Is Mitsubishi Kakoki Kaisha,Ltd expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 8.2× against a peer median of 14.8×, cheapest of 10 in its peer set.
How has Mitsubishi Kakoki Kaisha,Ltd stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -20.4% against -14.1% for the median peer; over one year -17.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.