Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 6101.T Tsugami Corp.Open in the cockpit ↗

Tsugami Corp.6101.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Industrial Machinery

Japanese maker of compact CNC lathes, especially popular with manufacturers in China and across Asia.

≈ A value-tier, Asia-focused OkumaMomentum laggard 4
Mkt cap
$1.03B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
78%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$15.0M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
+10.6 pp
WACC 13.4%
Hurdle
-21 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
6 days
12 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥3,590
1D-7.3%
1W-20.8%
1M-38.7%
3M-37.2%
6M-23.4%
YTD+25.0%
1Y+30.4%
ATR %8.5%
52w lowhigh58.4% off high

What Tsugami does

Japanese maker of compact CNC lathes, especially popular with manufacturers in China and across Asia.

Sells compact lathes to makers of small precision parts; China is its biggest market and part of production is done in a Chinese plant, so Chinese factory investment largely decides sales.

In one line: A value-tier, Asia-focused Okuma.

Products and services

  • Swiss-type CNC lathes
  • Compact turning centers
  • Machining centers

Customers

  • Auto parts makers in China
  • Precision component makers
  • Medical device parts makers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Capital goods
  • Machine tools
  • Compact/Swiss-type CNC lathes

What could go right

  • China/Asia manufacturing capex

What could go wrong

  • China capex cyclicality
  • Rising local Chinese competition

Moat: none (process know-how). Competes largely on price and reliability in the value segment against Chinese and Taiwanese rivals.

Headquarters: Nagano, Japan · Founded: 1937 · Employees: 3,515

Named competitors

  • Star Micronics private or unlisted
  • Citizen Machinery private or unlisted
  • DMG Mori 6141.T

Tsugami at a glance

Size Tsugami (6101.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Industrial Machinery) with a market value of $1.03B, the 725th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥3,590 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 23.4%, against -23.3% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 10th lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 23.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +14.3%); the operating margin is 27.4% (peer median 8.7%).

Valuation It trades at 1.1× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 3.6× (3rd cheapest of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +16%, so the hurdle is -21 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 10.6 points above its cost of capital (13.4% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 12 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 756101.T 75
Six months, rebased to 100: Tsugami against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Tsugami financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥140B¥129B¥107B¥83.9B¥95.0B
Revenue growth—+20%+28%-12%—
Gross profit¥52.9B¥48.0B¥36.4B¥23.7B¥26.8B
EBITDA¥40.8B¥36.3B¥24.3B¥13.9B¥17.8B
Net income¥19.1B¥16.7B¥10.9B¥5.38B¥7.70B
Free cash flow¥26.1B¥26.5B¥6.83B¥9.46B¥7.11B
Capital expenditure¥1.63B¥2.12B¥2.10B¥2.47B¥1.22B
Total debt¥9.25B¥9.37B¥11.9B¥17.2B¥18.0B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Tsugami competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-40%-20%0%+20%21556050600020093003820021196883763003070024386376LIAB0028333004886030403004990012883232805331802835636101.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Tsugami is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-25%0%+25%+50%0×10×20×21556050600020093003820021193003070024386376LIAB002833300488603040300499001288323280802835636101.TRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Tsugami is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%+30%0%20%21556050600020093003070024386376LIAB0028336030406101.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Tsugami is the large dot.

Tsugami competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (6101.T vs 6141.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
Tsugami 6101.T$1.03B-23%+24%27%1.1×-5.3%
Dmg Mori 6141.T$2.53B-13%+20%4%0.9×12.9%

How Tsugami compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Tsugami against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure6101.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-38.7%-15.5%lowest of 21
6-month return-23.4%-23.3%10th lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-58.4%-45.8%3rd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+23.7%+14.3%7th highest of 20
Operating margin27.4%8.7%4th highest of 20
EV / Sales1.1×3.6×3rd cheapest of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-5.3%7.5%least demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)+15.9%+9.4%3rd highest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-21.2 pp+1.5 ppleast demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital+10.6 pp-2.0 pp2nd highest of 20
EV / EBITDA3.8×9.4×cheapest of 7
Net debt / EBITDA-0.9×2.2×3rd least indebted of 8

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Tsugami 6101.TJapan$1.03B-23%+24%27%1.1×-5.3%+15.9%
Morimatsu International 2155.HKHong Kong$1.03B-16%+14%3%0.6×-2.4%+17.6%
Allied Machinery 605060.SSChina$1.03B-51%+24%22%4.4×15.5%+13.2%
Miracle Automation Engineering 002009.SZChina$1.03B-27%+6%1%2.8×34.6%-5.1%
Suzhou SLAC Precision Equipment 300382.SZChina$1.04B-31%+11%-4%3.8×n/an/a
Ningbo Kangqiang Electronics 002119.SZChina$1.04B-12%+49%5%2.6×n/an/a
MayAir Technology (China) 688376.SSChina$1.04B-27%+7%9%3.6×n/an/a
Ningbo Cixing 300307.SZChina$1.05B+24%+31%9%2.7×11.0%+9.5%
Jiangsu Shentong Valve 002438.SZChina$1.01B-23%-5%17%3.6×5.9%+6.1%
Nikkiso 6376.TJapan$1.05B-5%+11%8%1.0×6.3%+6.3%
Lindab International LIAB.STSweden$1.01B-10%-3%7%1.1×4.2%+9.4%
Guangzhou KDT Machinery 002833.SZChina$1.05B-20%+19%20%2.4×1.5%+7.6%
Est Tools 300488.SZChina$1.01B+17%+15%29%7.5×15.3%+13.1%
Hangzhou XZB Tech 603040.SSChina$1.06B-34%+4%34%8.5×18.2%+16.5%
Guangzhou Goaland Energy Conservation Tech 300499.SZChina$1.06B-40%+28%5%6.1×n/an/a
Sichuan Zigong Conveying Machine 001288.SZChina$999M+1%-20%3%5.4×n/an/a
Taesung 323280.KSSouth Korea$999M-44%+67%3%19.1×n/an/a
Noritake Co.,Limited 5331.TJapan$991M-19%+9%9%1.2×n/an/a
Phoenix Silicon International 8028.TWTaiwan$991M-26%+24%24%7.4×n/an/a
MACHVISION 3563.TWTaiwan$1.08B-36%+17%37%8.7×7.5%+5.9%
Linco Technology 3644.TWOTaiwan$1.08Bn/an/an/an/an/an/a

Questions

Who are Tsugami's main competitors?
Named competitors: Star Micronics (private or unlisted), Citizen Machinery (private or unlisted), DMG Mori (6141.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Morimatsu International (2155.HK), Allied Machinery (605060.SS), Miracle Automation Engineering (002009.SZ), Suzhou SLAC Precision Equipment (300382.SZ), Ningbo Kangqiang Electronics (002119.SZ), MayAir Technology (China) (688376.SS).
Is Tsugami expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 1.1× against a peer median of 3.6×, 3rd cheapest of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +16%, so the hurdle is -21 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Tsugami stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -23.4% against -23.3% for the median peer; over one year +30.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.