Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 300499.SZ Guangzhou Goaland Energy Conservation Tech Co. Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Guangzhou Goaland Energy Conservation Tech Co. Ltd. Class A300499.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Industrials›Industrial Machinery

Chinese maker of liquid cooling systems for power electronics, EV charging and data-center thermal management.

Momentum laggard 14
Mkt cap
$1.06B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
94%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$63.8M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
51.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-10.4 pp
WACC 15.5%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
168 days
23 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥23.26
1D-4.9%
1W-1.1%
1M-22.2%
3M-7.7%
6M-39.5%
YTD-24.2%
1Y-19.9%
ATR %7.8%
52w lowhigh51.6% off high

What Guangzhou Goaland Energy Conservation Tech does

Chinese maker of liquid cooling systems for power electronics, EV charging and data-center thermal management.

Designs liquid-cooling parts and systems to each customer's equipment, so it is paid per unit for parts designed into the customer's products and orders follow those products' production volumes. Data-centre cooling is a newer area built on the same thermal-design skills.

Products and services

  • Liquid cooling for power electronics
  • Data center cooling
  • EV charging cooling

Customers

  • Power equipment makers
  • Data center operators
  • EV charging infrastructure companies

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Thermal management
  • Liquid cooling systems

What could go right

  • AI data-center and high-voltage power electronics cooling demand

What could go wrong

  • Customer concentration; competitive thermal-management market

Moat: narrow (process know-how, customer qualification). Thermal-engineering expertise qualified into high-voltage power electronics and data-center systems.

Headquarters: Guangzhou, China · Employees: 811

Named competitors

  • Vertiv VRT
  • Boyd (liquid cooling) private or unlisted

Guangzhou Goaland Energy Conservation Tech at a glance

Size Guangzhou Goaland Energy Conservation Tech (300499.SZ) is a China Industrials company (Industrial Machinery) with a market value of $1.06B, the 2182nd largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥23.26 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 39.5%, against -23.4% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 2nd lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 27.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +17.0%); the operating margin is 5.3% (peer median 8.0%).

Valuation It trades at 51.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 26.2× (3rd most expensive of 16).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 10.4 points below its cost of capital (15.5% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 23 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 75300499.SZ 57
Six months, rebased to 100: Guangzhou Goaland Energy Conservation Tech against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Guangzhou Goaland Energy Conservation Tech financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥1.16BCN¥986MCN¥682MCN¥568MCN¥1.90B
Revenue growth—+45%+20%-70%—
Gross profitCN¥355MCN¥260MCN¥133MCN¥113MCN¥336M
EBITDAn/aCN¥63.0M-CN¥39.9M-CN¥31.8MCN¥76.0M
Net incomeCN¥54.7MCN¥28.4M-CN¥50.3M-CN¥31.8MCN¥287M
Free cash flow-CN¥110MCN¥99.3M-CN¥120MCN¥22.0M-CN¥122M
Capital expenditureCN¥23.4MCN¥25.8MCN¥52.8MCN¥24.0MCN¥99.6M
Total debtCN¥116MCN¥47.0MCN¥80.0MCN¥86.3MCN¥289M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Guangzhou Goaland Energy Conservation Tech competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-40%-20%0%+20%60304000283335636376300307242160316968837600211930038260369061016050600020093004613680300499.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Guangzhou Goaland Energy Conservation Tech is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-25%0%+25%+50%0×50×100×603040002833356363762421603169688376300382300263603690688090605060300499.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Guangzhou Goaland Energy Conservation Tech is the large dot.

Guangzhou Goaland Energy Conservation Tech competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (300499.SZ vs VRT)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Guangzhou Goaland Energy Conservation Tech 300499.SZ$1.06B-40%+28%5%51.7×n/a
Vertiv VRT$70.4B-46%+35%21%20.0×25.4%

How Guangzhou Goaland Energy Conservation Tech compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Guangzhou Goaland Energy Conservation Tech against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure300499.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-22.2%-17.1%9th lowest of 21
6-month return-39.5%-23.4%2nd lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-51.6%-52.2%11th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+27.5%+17.0%5th highest of 20
Operating margin5.3%8.0%9th lowest of 20
Forward P/E51.7×26.2×3rd most expensive of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital-10.4 pp-2.1 pp4th lowest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Guangzhou Goaland Energy Conservation Tech 300499.SZChina$1.06B-40%+28%5%51.7×n/an/a
Hangzhou XZB Tech 603040.SSChina$1.06B-34%+4%34%26.2×18.2%+16.5%
Guangzhou KDT Machinery 002833.SZChina$1.05B-20%+19%20%13.4×1.5%+7.6%
MACHVISION 3563.TWTaiwan$1.08B-36%+17%37%26.2×7.5%+5.9%
Nikkiso 6376.TJapan$1.05B-5%+11%8%10.0×6.3%+6.3%
Linco Technology 3644.TWOTaiwan$1.08Bn/an/an/an/an/an/a
Ningbo Cixing 300307.SZChina$1.05B+24%+31%9%n/a11.0%+9.5%
Sunonwealth Electric Machine Industry 2421.TWTaiwan$1.08B-16%+21%16%9.6×-2.5%+7.9%
Lanzhou LS Heavy Equipment 603169.SSChina$1.09B-34%-29%-19%34.6×n/an/a
MayAir Technology (China) 688376.SSChina$1.04B-27%+7%9%28.2×n/an/a
Ningbo Kangqiang Electronics 002119.SZChina$1.04B-12%+49%5%n/an/an/a
Suzhou SLAC Precision Equipment 300382.SZChina$1.04B-31%+11%-4%67.4×n/an/a
Longhua Technology Group (Luoyang) Co 300263.SZChina$1.10B-29%+12%5%36.4×28.8%+11.1%
PNC Process Systems 603690.SSChina$1.10B-23%-36%-48%19.6×32.9%+15.4%
Tsugami 6101.TJapan$1.03B-23%+24%27%n/a-5.3%+15.9%
Morimatsu International 2155.HKHong Kong$1.03B-16%+14%3%14.2×-2.4%+17.6%
Guangzhou Risong Intelligent Technology 688090.SSChina$1.10B-19%+61%4%132.3×43.8%+3.4%
Allied Machinery 605060.SSChina$1.03B-51%+24%22%21.1×15.5%+13.2%
Miracle Automation Engineering 002009.SZChina$1.03B-27%+6%1%28.8×34.6%-5.1%
Tanac Automation 300461.SZChina$1.11B-18%+126%6%n/an/an/a
Gudeng Precision Industrial 3680.TWOTaiwan$1.11B-34%+19%15%21.0×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Guangzhou Goaland Energy Conservation Tech's main competitors?
Named competitors: Vertiv (VRT), Boyd (liquid cooling) (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Hangzhou XZB Tech (603040.SS), Guangzhou KDT Machinery (002833.SZ), MACHVISION (3563.TW), Nikkiso (6376.T), Linco Technology (3644.TWO), Ningbo Cixing (300307.SZ).
Is Guangzhou Goaland Energy Conservation Tech expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 51.7× against a peer median of 26.2×, 3rd most expensive of 16 in its peer set.
How has Guangzhou Goaland Energy Conservation Tech stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -39.5% against -23.4% for the median peer; over one year -19.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.