Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 605255.SS Ningbo TIP Rubber Technology Co., Ltd Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Ningbo TIP Rubber Technology Co., Ltd Class A605255.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Consumer Discretionary›Auto Parts: OEM

Chinese maker of rubber sealing and vibration-damping components for automobiles.

Momentum laggard 3
Mkt cap
$959M
US dollars, full cap
$/day
$6.08M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
n/a
WACC 9.5%
Hurdle
+47 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · CNYCN¥47.71
1D-3.6%
1W-1.9%
1M-15.0%
3M-27.4%
6M-53.2%
YTD-78.1%
1Y-37.2%
ATR %6.4%
52w lowhigh78.1% off high

What Ningbo TIP Rubber Technology does

Chinese maker of rubber sealing and vibration-damping components for automobiles.

Products and services

  • Rubber seals
  • Vibration-damping mounts

Customers

  • Domestic automakers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer discretionary
  • Auto parts
  • Rubber sealing/NVH

What could go wrong

  • Auto production cyclicality

Moat: none. Commodity rubber-parts maker in a competitive segment.

Headquarters: Ningbo, Zhejiang, China · Employees: 639

Named competitors

Ningbo TIP Rubber Technology at a glance

Size Ningbo TIP Rubber Technology (605255.SS) is a China Consumer Discretionary company (Auto Parts: OEM) with a market value of $959M, the 2382nd largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥47.71 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 53.2%, against -21.6% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 9.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.7%); the operating margin is 5.5% (peer median 5.9%).

Valuation It trades at 18.7× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.3× (2nd most expensive of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 48% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +1%, so the hurdle is +47 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 77605255.SS 46
Six months, rebased to 100: Ningbo TIP Rubber Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Ningbo TIP Rubber Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥300MCN¥316MCN¥341MCN¥340MCN¥328M
Revenue growth—-7%0%+4%—
Gross profitCN¥123MCN¥87.1MCN¥107MCN¥93.0MCN¥84.2M
EBITDAn/aCN¥78.3MCN¥90.3MCN¥77.0MCN¥62.6M
Net income-CN¥7.64MCN¥26.1MCN¥33.1MCN¥30.6MCN¥25.6M
Free cash flowCN¥59.2MCN¥69.2MCN¥70.5MCN¥56.3M-CN¥61.2M
Capital expenditureCN¥24.1MCN¥20.3MCN¥17.1MCN¥29.1MCN¥153M
Total debtCN¥810,055CN¥851MCN¥3.75MCN¥5.07MCN¥3.60M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Ningbo TIP Rubber Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%+20%011210600592600698PRICOLLTD603166002537SSWL000030AUTN00244800131160328659756009600022843006950009807220DCH605255.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Ningbo TIP Rubber Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%0×10×20×011210600592600698PRICOLLTD603166002537SSWL0000300024480013116032865975600960002284300695000980600742DCH605255.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Ningbo TIP Rubber Technology is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%20%40%011210600592002537SSWL000030AUTN0024480022840009807220605255.SSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Ningbo TIP Rubber Technology is the large dot.

Ningbo TIP Rubber Technology competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (605255.SS vs 000887.SZ)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
Ningbo TIP Rubber Technology 605255.SS$959M-53%-9%5%18.7×47.5%
Anhui Zhongding Sealing Parts 000887.SZ$3.32B-3%+9%8%1.2×3.8%

How Ningbo TIP Rubber Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Ningbo TIP Rubber Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure605255.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-15.0%0.0%4th lowest of 21
6-month return-53.2%-21.6%lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-78.1%-42.0%2nd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-9.3%+4.7%4th lowest of 21
Operating margin5.5%5.9%10th lowest of 21
EV / Sales18.7×1.3×2nd most expensive of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)47.5%-1.2%most demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)+0.9%+9.4%2nd lowest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+46.7 pp-4.5 pp2nd most demanding of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Ningbo TIP Rubber Technology 605255.SSChina$959M-53%-9%5%18.7×47.5%+0.9%
Hyundai Wia 011210.KSSouth Korea$962M-41%+12%2%0.1×-11.0%+5.2%
Fujian Longxi Bearing (Group) 600592.SSChina$926M-19%-2%11%4.2×14.0%+3.0%
Hunan Tyen Machinery 600698.SSChina$918M-5%+17%-7%10.5×n/an/a
Pricol PRICOLLTD.NSIndia$916M+15%+39%9%2.0×n/an/a
Guilin Fuda 603166.SSChina$1.01B-25%+9%15%3.8×n/an/a
HyUnion 002537.SZChina$1.01B-21%-6%4%1.1×-1.7%+1.7%
Steel Strips Wheels SSWL.NSIndia$898M+153%+33%8%1.5×25.4%+24.3%
FAWER Automotive Parts 000030.SZChina$897M-28%-7%0%0.6×4.9%+9.4%
Autoneum AUTN.SWSwitzerland$896M+7%-1%6%0.6×-7.5%+5.6%
ZYNP Corporation 002448.SZChina$896M-32%+26%13%1.4×-3.0%+16.9%
Chuzhou Duoli Automotive Technology 001311.SZChina$894M-36%+45%7%1.2×n/an/a
Jiangsu Riying Electronics 603286.SSChina$891M-22%+1%-5%6.2×n/an/a
Topre 5975.TJapan$1.04B+32%+5%8%0.4×-1.2%+12.0%
Bohai Automotive Systems 600960.SSChina$1.04B-13%-26%-2%2.2×n/an/a
Zhejiang Asia-Pacific Mechanical & Electronic 002284.SZChina$1.05B-29%+10%9%1.1×-1.8%+13.9%
Zhejiang ZhaoFeng Mechanical & Electric 300695.SZChina$875M-6%+4%11%6.7×n/an/a
Zotye Automobile 000980.SZChina$1.05B-35%-33%-93%21.6×37.5%-17.1%
Changchun FAWAY Group Automobile Components 600742.SSChina$863M-18%-20%2%0.1×n/an/a
Musashi Seimitsu Industry 7220.TJapan$861M-52%+4%6%0.6×9.7%+11.1%
Dauch DCHUnited States$1.07B-32%+41%3%0.7×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Ningbo TIP Rubber Technology's main competitors?
Named competitors: Anhui Zhongding Sealing Parts (000887.SZ). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Hyundai Wia (011210.KS), Fujian Longxi Bearing (Group) (600592.SS), Hunan Tyen Machinery (600698.SS), Pricol (PRICOLLTD.NS), Guilin Fuda (603166.SS), HyUnion (002537.SZ).
Is Ningbo TIP Rubber Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 18.7× against a peer median of 1.3×, 2nd most expensive of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 48% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +1%, so the hurdle is +47 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Ningbo TIP Rubber Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -53.2% against -21.6% for the median peer; over one year -37.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.