Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 603458.SS Guizhou Transportation Planning Survey & Design Academe Co. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Guizhou Transportation Planning Survey & Design Academe Co. Class A603458.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Industrials›Engineering & Construction
Momentum leader 85
Mkt cap
$462M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
96%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$13.6M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-19.9 pp
WACC 7.5%
Hurdle
+13 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · CNYCN¥10.29
1D-1.5%
1W+8.3%
1M-4.5%
3M+17.1%
6M-14.0%
YTD+2.7%
1Y+18.4%
ATR %5.1%
52w lowhigh37.8% off high

What Guizhou Transportation Planning Survey & Design Academe does

Employees: 2,375

Guizhou Transportation Planning Survey & Design Academe at a glance

Size Guizhou Transportation Planning Survey & Design Academe (603458.SS) is a China Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $462M, the 4055th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥10.29 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 14.0%, against -14.5% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 11th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 19.5% over the last twelve months (peer median -2.8%); the operating margin is -35.2% (peer median 4.2%).

Valuation It trades at 2.6× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.4× (7th most expensive of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 0% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -14%, so the hurdle is +13 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 19.9 points below its cost of capital (7.5% WACC).

Relative performance

7510012511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026603458.SS 85Peer median 85
Six months, rebased to 100: Guizhou Transportation Planning Survey & Design Academe against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Guizhou Transportation Planning Survey & Design Academe financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥1.23BCN¥1.33BCN¥1.50BCN¥2.02BCN¥2.15B
Revenue growth—-11%-26%-6%—
Gross profitCN¥239MCN¥251MCN¥355MCN¥624MCN¥693M
EBITDA-CN¥396M-CN¥359M-CN¥256MCN¥83.8MCN¥286M
Net income-CN¥419M-CN¥386M-CN¥307MCN¥56.6MCN¥162M
Free cash flowCN¥240MCN¥165MCN¥214MCN¥433MCN¥188M
Capital expenditureCN¥17.8MCN¥29.6MCN¥19.3MCN¥33.8MCN¥37.6M
Total debtCN¥748MCN¥988MCN¥1.21BCN¥1.45BCN¥1.87B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Guizhou Transportation Planning Survey & Design Academe competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-20%-10%0%2530PXM6038436035590026286005123007460020371976BBCP188200255125431899DOM688509PRAJINDSYLAMP603357603458.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Guizhou Transportation Planning Survey & Design Academe is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-40%-20%0%+20%0×2.5×5×7.5×2530PXM6038436035590026286005123007460020371976BBCP188200255125431899688509PRAJINDSYLAMP603357603458.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Guizhou Transportation Planning Survey & Design Academe is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%-25%0%25%50%PXM0026283007461976BBCP18821899688509PRAJINDSYL603458.SSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Guizhou Transportation Planning Survey & Design Academe is the large dot.

Guizhou Transportation Planning Survey & Design Academe competitors and peer comparison

How Guizhou Transportation Planning Survey & Design Academe compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Guizhou Transportation Planning Survey & Design Academe against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure603458.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-4.5%-8.4%8th highest of 21
6-month return-14.0%-14.5%11th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-37.8%-30.3%8th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-19.5%-2.8%5th lowest of 21
Operating margin-35.2%4.2%2nd lowest of 21
EV / Sales2.6×1.4×7th most expensive of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-0.4%6.0%6th least demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)-13.7%+2.6%3rd lowest of 13
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+13.2 pp-5.5 pp5th most demanding of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital-19.9 pp-2.8 pplowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Guizhou Transportation Planning Survey & Design Academe 603458.SSChina$462M-14%-19%-35%2.6×-0.4%-13.7%
Delpha Construction 2530.TWTaiwan$462M-11%-59%26%10.2×n/an/a
Polimex - Mostostal PXM.WAPoland$462M-14%+21%4%0.3×2.2%+20.7%
Zhengping Road & Bridge Construction 603843.SSChina$469M-50%-15%-18%4.8×n/an/a
Zhongtongguomai Communication 603559.SSChina$455M-1%+1%-18%6.7×n/an/a
Chengdu Road & Bridge Engineering 002628.SZChina$472M-24%+1%-23%5.3×24.8%-16.2%
Tengda Construction 600512.SSChina$452M-21%+32%-3%0.2×n/an/a
Hanjia Digital Intelligence Science and Technology 300746.SZChina$452M+7%-2%0%3.4×47.6%-10.5%
Poly Union Chemical 002037.SZChina$477M-23%-11%-8%1.4×n/an/a
Meisei Industrial 1976.TJapan$478M-12%-5%13%0.7×-9.6%+3.6%
Concrete Pumping BBCPUnited States$479M+20%+7%12%2.1×9.9%+5.2%
TOA ROAD 1882.TJapan$479M-4%-4%5%0.5×-8.4%+1.6%
Shenzhen Glory Medical 002551.SZChina$479M-17%-3%-17%2.4×n/an/a
Hwang Chang General Contractor 2543.TWTaiwan$480M-32%+31%14%1.4×n/an/a
Fukuda 1899.TJapan$483M+10%+6%6%0.2×-19.9%-2.0%
Global Dominion Access DOM.MCSpain$442M-16%-10%6%0.7×-7.5%+0.3%
Zhengyuan Geomatics 688509.SSChina$440M-16%-22%-44%7.3×30.4%-19.7%
PRAJ Industries PRAJIND.NSIndia$486M-38%+2%2%1.3×49.1%+19.4%
Symal SYL.AXAustralia$439M+2%+28%4%0.7×14.7%+17.9%
Amper AMP.MCSpain$437M-8%-37%7%2.2×n/an/a
Anhui Transport Consulting & Design Institute 603357.SSChina$436M-31%-39%12%1.3×-7.3%+5.7%

Questions

Which companies are Guizhou Transportation Planning Survey & Design Academe's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Delpha Construction (2530.TW), Polimex - Mostostal (PXM.WA), Zhengping Road & Bridge Construction (603843.SS), Zhongtongguomai Communication (603559.SS), Chengdu Road & Bridge Engineering (002628.SZ), Tengda Construction (600512.SS), Hanjia Digital Intelligence Science and Technology (300746.SZ), Poly Union Chemical (002037.SZ).
Is Guizhou Transportation Planning Survey & Design Academe expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 2.6× against a peer median of 1.4×, 7th most expensive of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 0% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -14%, so the hurdle is +13 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Guizhou Transportation Planning Survey & Design Academe stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -14.0% against -14.5% for the median peer; over one year +18.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.