Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 603155.SS Xinyaqiang Silicon Chemistry Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Xinyaqiang Silicon Chemistry Co., Ltd. Class A603155.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Materials›Chemicals: Major Diversified

Chinese producer of organosilicon/silicone chemical products (name-derived; specifics not fully confirmed).

Momentum neutral 59
Mkt cap
$788M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
27%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$49.2M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
37.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-3.5 pp
WACC 8.6%
Hurdle
+27 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
173 days
28 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥11.48
1D-3.5%
1W+2.6%
1M-18.2%
3M-4.7%
6M-5.8%
YTD-2.8%
1Y+6.4%
ATR %8.1%
52w lowhigh46.3% off high

What Xinyaqiang Silicon Chemistry does

Chinese producer of organosilicon/silicone chemical products (name-derived; specifics not fully confirmed).

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials
  • Specialty chemicals
  • Silicone chemicals

Moat: none

Headquarters: China · Employees: 398

Xinyaqiang Silicon Chemistry at a glance

Size Xinyaqiang Silicon Chemistry (603155.SS) is a China Materials company (Chemicals: Major Diversified) with a market value of $788M, the 2802nd largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥11.48 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 5.8%, against -24.8% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 6th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 5.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.6%); the operating margin is 10.4% (peer median 9.1%).

Valuation It trades at 37.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 18.6× (3rd most expensive of 13).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 31% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is +27 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.5 points below its cost of capital (8.6% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 28 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026603155.SS 91Peer median 76
Six months, rebased to 100: Xinyaqiang Silicon Chemistry against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Xinyaqiang Silicon Chemistry financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥678MCN¥589MCN¥714MCN¥667MCN¥1.13B
Revenue growth—-18%+7%-41%—
Gross profitCN¥139MCN¥106MCN¥129MCN¥144MCN¥333M
EBITDACN¥118MCN¥87.4MCN¥120MCN¥126MCN¥323M
Net incomeCN¥95.1MCN¥81.9MCN¥114MCN¥123MCN¥302M
Free cash flowCN¥106MCN¥51.8MCN¥186MCN¥166MCN¥110M
Capital expenditureCN¥40.7MCN¥30.4MCN¥18.1MCN¥50.7MCN¥230M
Total debtCN¥128MCN¥40.8MCN¥118MCN¥110MCN¥201M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Xinyaqiang Silicon Chemistry competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%6882375234497560536644716886694189RPEL301393300082688359002274600165301206603181300121300641603285688750603155.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Xinyaqiang Silicon Chemistry is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%0×100×200×6882375234497560536644714189301393300082002274603181300121JUBLINGREA603155.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Xinyaqiang Silicon Chemistry is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%6882375234497544716886694189002274300121JUBLINGREA300641688750603155.SSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Xinyaqiang Silicon Chemistry is the large dot.

Xinyaqiang Silicon Chemistry competitors and peer comparison

How Xinyaqiang Silicon Chemistry compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Xinyaqiang Silicon Chemistry against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure603155.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-18.2%-14.1%8th lowest of 21
6-month return-5.8%-24.8%6th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-46.3%-40.2%8th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+5.8%+7.6%10th lowest of 21
Operating margin10.4%9.1%9th highest of 21
Forward P/E37.0×18.6×3rd most expensive of 13
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)31.1%17.7%3rd most demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)+3.9%+8.3%5th lowest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+27.2 pp-0.6 pp2nd most demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital-3.5 pp-3.0 pp11th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA33.9×10.6×2nd most expensive of 7
Net debt / EBITDA-10.9×-0.7×least indebted of 8

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Xinyaqiang Silicon Chemistry 603155.SSChina$788M-6%+6%10%37.0×31.1%+3.9%
Hubei Chaozhuo Aviation Technology 688237.SSChina$776M+6%-1%1%41.5×45.3%+26.0%
Daxin Materials 5234.TWTaiwan$767M-42%+10%19%25.7×17.7%+1.5%
JCU 4975.TJapan$759M-26%+2%40%13.6×6.3%+7.0%
Jiangxi Hungpai New Material 605366.SSChina$821M-47%+2%-11%236.0×n/an/a
Sanyo Chemical Industries 4471.TJapan$823M+24%0%10%10.5×-5.1%-2.5%
Polyrocks Chemical 688669.SSChina$831M+40%-8%-6%n/a35.9%+15.2%
KH Neochem 4189.TJapan$732M+20%-11%12%12.3×-5.7%+8.3%
Raghav Productivity Enhancers RPEL.NSIndia$864M+133%+38%28%n/an/an/a
Suzhou Highfine Biotech 301393.SZChina$865M-8%+36%17%32.3×n/an/a
Liaoning Oxiranchem,Inc 300082.SZChina$716M-39%+4%0%35.1×n/an/a
Guangzhou Sanfu Newmaterials Technology 688359.SSChina$870M-41%+8%-7%n/an/an/a
Jiansu Huachang Chemical 002274.SZChina$679M-25%+9%-3%5.7×23.6%+1.3%
Ningxia Zhongke Biotechnology 600165.SSChina$679M-19%+8%-73%n/an/an/a
Shandong Sanyuan Biotechnology 301206.SZChina$676M-18%+15%4%n/an/an/a
Zhejiang Huangma Technology 603181.SSChina$935M-30%+7%17%14.5×n/an/a
Shandong Yanggu Huatai Chemical 300121.SZChina$648M-20%+11%8%16.1×3.2%+12.1%
Jubilant Ingrevia JUBLINGREA.NSIndia$966M-24%+15%10%21.1×27.3%+44.9%
Jiangsu Zhengdan Chemical Industry 300641.SZChina$981M-28%-30%17%n/a8.8%+11.6%
Shandong Jianbang New Material 603285.SSChina$631M-40%+8%22%n/an/an/a
Hunan Xiangtou Goldsky Titanium Industry Technology 688750.SSChina$629M-27%+4%6%n/a30.5%-4.3%

Questions

Which companies are Xinyaqiang Silicon Chemistry's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Hubei Chaozhuo Aviation Technology (688237.SS), Daxin Materials (5234.TW), JCU (4975.T), Jiangxi Hungpai New Material (605366.SS), Sanyo Chemical Industries (4471.T), Polyrocks Chemical (688669.SS), KH Neochem (4189.T), Raghav Productivity Enhancers (RPEL.NS).
Is Xinyaqiang Silicon Chemistry expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 37.0× against a peer median of 18.6×, 3rd most expensive of 13 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 31% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is +27 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Xinyaqiang Silicon Chemistry stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -5.8% against -24.8% for the median peer; over one year +6.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.