Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 688750.SS Hunan Xiangtou Goldsky Titanium Industry Technology Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Hunan Xiangtou Goldsky Titanium Industry Technology Co., Ltd. Class A688750.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Materials›Chemicals: Major Diversified
Momentum neutral 53
Mkt cap
$629M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
58%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$4.58M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-9.1 pp
WACC 11.4%
Hurdle
+35 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · CNYCN¥13.65
1D-0.4%
1W+8.9%
1M-0.5%
3M-5.9%
6M-26.9%
YTD-31.6%
1Y-34.3%
ATR %3.0%
52w lowhigh40.8% off high

What Hunan Xiangtou Goldsky Titanium Industry Technology does

Employees: 546

Hunan Xiangtou Goldsky Titanium Industry Technology at a glance

Size Hunan Xiangtou Goldsky Titanium Industry Technology (688750.SS) is a China Materials company (Chemicals: Major Diversified) with a market value of $629M, the 3312th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥13.65 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 26.9%, against -21.9% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 4.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.0%); the operating margin is 6.0% (peer median 7.2%).

Valuation It trades at 6.7× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 3.0× (4th most expensive of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 31% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -4%, so the hurdle is +35 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 9.1 points below its cost of capital (11.4% WACC).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 77688750.SS 72
Six months, rebased to 100: Hunan Xiangtou Goldsky Titanium Industry Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Hunan Xiangtou Goldsky Titanium Industry Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥641MCN¥614MCN¥804MCN¥798MCN¥700M
Revenue growth—-24%+1%+14%—
Gross profitCN¥208MCN¥179MCN¥294MCN¥262MCN¥224M
EBITDAn/aCN¥109MCN¥222MCN¥209MCN¥179M
Net incomeCN¥90.0MCN¥59.3MCN¥152MCN¥147MCN¥133M
Free cash flowCN¥255MCN¥109M-CN¥29.3MCN¥180MCN¥9.60M
Capital expenditureCN¥212MCN¥125MCN¥139MCN¥124MCN¥30.7M
Total debtCN¥473MCN¥575MCN¥512MCN¥574MCN¥535M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Hunan Xiangtou Goldsky Titanium Industry Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%-10%0%+10%603285300530300121300839603004300801301206600165002274688267000635002783300082300055603351ACI418949755234688750.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Hunan Xiangtou Goldsky Titanium Industry Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%2.5×5×7.5×603285300530300121300839603004300801301206600165002274688267000635002783300082300055603351ACI418930053749755234688750.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Hunan Xiangtou Goldsky Titanium Industry Technology is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%0%20%40%60%300121300839603004300801002274002783603351418930053749755234688750.SSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Hunan Xiangtou Goldsky Titanium Industry Technology is the large dot.

Hunan Xiangtou Goldsky Titanium Industry Technology competitors and peer comparison

How Hunan Xiangtou Goldsky Titanium Industry Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Hunan Xiangtou Goldsky Titanium Industry Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure688750.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-0.5%-13.3%5th highest of 21
6-month return-26.9%-21.9%8th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-40.8%-38.1%8th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+4.2%+7.0%9th lowest of 21
Operating margin6.0%7.2%10th lowest of 21
EV / Sales6.7×3.0×4th most expensive of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)30.5%6.3%2nd most demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)-4.3%+8.3%2nd lowest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+34.8 pp-3.0 pp2nd most demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital-9.1 pp-0.1 pp4th lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Hunan Xiangtou Goldsky Titanium Industry Technology 688750.SSChina$629M-27%+4%6%6.7×30.5%-4.3%
Shandong Jianbang New Material 603285.SSChina$631M-40%+8%22%5.2×n/an/a
Hunan Lead Power Technology 300530.SZChina$621M+2%+16%-61%28.8×n/an/a
Shandong Yanggu Huatai Chemical 300121.SZChina$648M-20%+11%8%1.1×3.2%+12.1%
Ningbo Bohui Chemical Technology 300839.SZChina$606M-4%+42%4%1.2×3.2%+23.1%
Zhejiang Dragon Technology 603004.SSChina$597M-18%-11%16%4.3×16.4%+1.7%
Shandong Taihe Technologies 300801.SZChina$589M-41%-2%7%1.2×5.3%+12.9%
Shandong Sanyuan Biotechnology 301206.SZChina$676M-18%+15%4%4.0×n/an/a
Ningxia Zhongke Biotechnology 600165.SSChina$679M-19%+8%-73%8.7×n/an/a
Jiansu Huachang Chemical 002274.SZChina$679M-25%+9%-3%0.7×23.6%+1.3%
China Catalyst 688267.SSChina$578M-27%-3%18%3.7×n/an/a
Ningxia Yinglite Chemicals 000635.SZChina$562M+17%-14%-48%2.8×n/an/a
Hubei Kailong Chemical 002783.SZChina$554M-17%-2%8%1.8×-2.4%+12.0%
Liaoning Oxiranchem,Inc 300082.SZChina$716M-39%+4%0%1.3×n/an/a
Beijing WBD New Materials 300055.SZChina$549M-59%+13%-9%1.8×n/an/a
Nanjing Well Pharmaceutical 603351.SSChina$548M-1%+9%13%2.8×9.7%+12.7%
Archean Chemical Industries ACI.NSIndia$544M-33%+6%12%4.8×n/an/a
KH Neochem 4189.TJapan$732M+20%-11%12%1.2×-5.7%+8.3%
Jiangsu Kuangshun Photosensitivity New Material Stock 300537.SZChina$536M-24%+4%4%6.7×58.4%-8.5%
JCU 4975.TJapan$759M-26%+2%40%3.2×6.3%+7.0%
Daxin Materials 5234.TWTaiwan$767M-42%+10%19%5.1×17.7%+1.5%

Questions

Which companies are Hunan Xiangtou Goldsky Titanium Industry Technology's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Shandong Jianbang New Material (603285.SS), Hunan Lead Power Technology (300530.SZ), Shandong Yanggu Huatai Chemical (300121.SZ), Ningbo Bohui Chemical Technology (300839.SZ), Zhejiang Dragon Technology (603004.SS), Shandong Taihe Technologies (300801.SZ), Shandong Sanyuan Biotechnology (301206.SZ), Ningxia Zhongke Biotechnology (600165.SS).
Is Hunan Xiangtou Goldsky Titanium Industry Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 6.7× against a peer median of 3.0×, 4th most expensive of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 31% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -4%, so the hurdle is +35 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Hunan Xiangtou Goldsky Titanium Industry Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -26.9% against -21.9% for the median peer; over one year -34.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.