Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 601615.SS Ming Yang Smart Energy Group Limited Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Ming Yang Smart Energy Group Limited Class A601615.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Industrials›Electrical Products

One of China's largest wind turbine makers, supplying onshore and offshore turbines to wind farm developers.

≈ A Chinese Vestas/Siemens GamesaMomentum laggard 4
Mkt cap
$2.80B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
73%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$58.4M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
19.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-5.4 pp
WACC 5.3%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
168 days
23 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥8.35
1D-2.3%
1W+2.5%
1M-12.7%
3M-28.2%
6M-47.3%
YTD-42.3%
1Y-53.7%
ATR %4.5%
52w lowhigh69.0% off high

What Ming Yang Smart Energy does

One of China's largest wind turbine makers, supplying onshore and offshore turbines to wind farm developers.

Sells wind turbines mostly to large state-owned power companies through competitive bids, so the pace of Chinese wind installations and pricing pressure among turbine makers set results. It specialises in large offshore turbines, where fewer rivals can supply.

In one line: A Chinese Vestas/Siemens Gamesa.

Products and services

  • Onshore wind turbines
  • Offshore wind turbines
  • Floating offshore wind platforms

Customers

  • Chinese state-owned power generators
  • Offshore wind developers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Wind power equipment
  • Wind turbine manufacturing
  • Onshore & offshore turbines

What could go right

  • China and export offshore wind build-out

What could go wrong

  • Turbine price competition
  • Offshore project delays

Moat: narrow (scale, installed base, process know-how). Top-3 domestic turbine maker with offshore/floating technology lead, though pricing remains competitive.

Headquarters: Zhongshan, Guangdong, China · Founded: 2006 · Employees: 13,859

Named competitors

Ming Yang Smart Energy at a glance

Size Ming Yang Smart Energy (601615.SS) is a China Industrials company (Electrical Products) with a market value of $2.80B, the 912th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥8.35 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 47.3%, against -29.7% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 8.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +18.9%); the operating margin is -3.8% (peer median 9.8%).

Valuation It trades at 19.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 18.3× (9th most expensive of 18).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 5.4 points below its cost of capital (5.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 23 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 69601615.SS 53
Six months, rebased to 100: Ming Yang Smart Energy against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Ming Yang Smart Energy financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥35.9BCN¥38.1BCN¥27.1BCN¥28.1BCN¥30.6B
Revenue growth—+41%-4%-8%—
Gross profitCN¥3.44BCN¥3.53BCN¥1.85BCN¥2.03BCN¥5.75B
EBITDAn/aCN¥2.38BCN¥990MCN¥624MCN¥3.82B
Net income-CN¥1.09BCN¥660MCN¥346MCN¥377MCN¥3.44B
Free cash flow-CN¥12.9B-CN¥7.67B-CN¥7.76B-CN¥10.1B-CN¥8.74B
Capital expenditureCN¥1.87BCN¥2.54BCN¥5.65BCN¥7.61BCN¥8.01B
Total debtCN¥44.4BCN¥35.1BCN¥30.0BCN¥29.4BCN¥17.5B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Ming Yang Smart Energy competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%-40%-20%0%+20%30056800130168881965926882791729002498002249688772603376SCHNEIDER3006996674002270600550600330062040002266601615.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Ming Yang Smart Energy is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%+80%0×100×200×300×30056800130168881965926882791729002498688772SCHNEIDER3006996674600330002130062040601615.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Ming Yang Smart Energy is the large dot.

Ming Yang Smart Energy competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (601615.SS vs 002202.SZ vs VWS.CO vs 300772.SZ)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Ming Yang Smart Energy 601615.SS$2.80B-47%+8%-4%19.4×n/a
Goldwind Science & Technology 002202.SZ$8.58B-45%+11%6%16.6×n/a
Vestas Wind Systems A/S VWS.CO$31.0B+8%+10%7%21.3×0.5%
Windey Energy Technology 300772.SZ$1.09B-42%+23%-2%n/an/a
Sany Renewable Energy 688349.SS$3.50B-22%+30%2%21.7×n/a
Siemens Energy ENR.DE$111B-33%+9%9%26.4×17.3%
Nordex NDX1.DE$11.4B-7%+12%8%19.6×3.7%
GE Vernova GEV$205B-26%+17%7%32.2×24.9%
Dongfang Electric 600875.SS$12.9B-42%+2%5%16.1×n/a

How Ming Yang Smart Energy compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Ming Yang Smart Energy against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure601615.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-12.7%-8.2%8th lowest of 21
6-month return-47.3%-29.7%3rd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-69.0%-48.4%2nd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+8.0%+18.9%5th lowest of 21
Operating margin-3.8%9.8%2nd lowest of 21
Forward P/E19.4×18.3×9th most expensive of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital-5.4 pp-1.4 pp4th lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Ming Yang Smart Energy 601615.SSChina$2.80B-47%+8%-4%19.4×n/an/a
Shenzhen Senior Technology Material 300568.SZChina$2.80B-23%+45%10%27.4×n/an/a
Shijiazhuang Shangtai Technology 001301.SZChina$2.80B-16%+34%13%16.6×n/an/a
Tianneng Battery 688819.SSChina$2.79B-37%+2%0%10.9×-7.9%+5.4%
Mabuchi Motor 6592.TJapan$2.84B+18%+12%12%17.9×5.8%+11.5%
Fortior Technology (Shenzhen) 688279.SSChina$2.76B0%+46%25%62.7×n/an/a
Time Interconnect Technology 1729.HKHong Kong$2.84B-57%+84%7%10.8×n/an/a
Qingdao Hanhe Cable 002498.SZChina$2.74B-37%+21%3%18.3×n/an/a
Zhongshan Broad-Ocean Motor 002249.SZChina$2.73B-21%+1%6%n/a7.7%+9.5%
Zhuhai CosMX Battery 688772.SSChina$2.88B+2%+18%-2%144.1×n/an/a
Daming Electronics 603376.SSChina$2.71B-22%+110%9%n/an/an/a
Schneider Electric Infrastructure SCHNEIDER.NSIndia$2.69B-21%+10%10%76.0×56.2%+17.4%
Weihai Guangwei Composites 300699.SZChina$2.68B-35%+12%16%45.8×13.8%+6.2%
GS Yuasa 6674.TJapan$2.67B-33%+6%10%9.9×n/an/a
Huaming Power Equipment 002270.SZChina$2.66B-19%+7%32%22.3×5.9%+12.3%
Baoding Tianwei Baobian Electric 600550.SSChina$2.65B-36%+13%4%n/a45.5%+7.1%
TDG 600330.SSChina$2.96B-43%+21%-19%320.4×n/an/a
Shenzhen Woer Heat-Shrinkable Material 002130.SZChina$2.98B-37%+20%15%16.4×1.8%+15.6%
Luster LightTech 688400.SSChina$2.63B-37%+10%0%28.1×56.8%+10.7%
Sanil Electric 062040.KSSouth Korea$2.62B-56%+29%36%17.1×15.1%+50.8%
Zhefu 002266.SZChina$3.09B-26%+27%8%9.3×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Ming Yang Smart Energy's main competitors?
Named competitors: Goldwind (002202.SZ), Vestas (VWS.CO), Windey Energy Technology (300772.SZ), Sany Renewable Energy (688349.SS), Siemens Energy (ENR.DE), Nordex (NDX1.DE). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Shenzhen Senior Technology Material (300568.SZ), Shijiazhuang Shangtai Technology (001301.SZ), Tianneng Battery (688819.SS), Mabuchi Motor (6592.T), Fortior Technology (Shenzhen) (688279.SS), Time Interconnect Technology (1729.HK).
Is Ming Yang Smart Energy expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 19.4× against a peer median of 18.3×, 9th most expensive of 18 in its peer set.
How has Ming Yang Smart Energy stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -47.3% against -29.7% for the median peer; over one year -53.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.