Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 002202.SZ Goldwind Science & Technology Co. Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Goldwind Science & Technology Co. Ltd. Class A002202.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Industrials›Electrical Products

One of the world's largest wind-turbine makers, also developing and operating wind farms in China and abroad.

≈ China's answer to Vestas/GE Vernova in wind turbinesMomentum laggard 8
Mkt cap
$8.58B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
71%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$171M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
16.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-0.7 pp
WACC 6.6%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
146 days
1 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥15.13
1D-1.9%
1W+5.1%
1M-9.3%
3M-21.4%
6M-45.1%
YTD-25.8%
1Y-0.8%
ATR %4.3%
52w lowhigh59.1% off high

What Goldwind Science & Technology does

One of the world's largest wind-turbine makers, also developing and operating wind farms in China and abroad.

Sells turbines to developers, mostly state-owned power companies in China, with service contracts running for years after installation. It also builds wind farms and sells stakes in them, which recycles capital and helps win turbine orders. Most sales are in China.

In one line: China's answer to Vestas/GE Vernova in wind turbines.

Products and services

  • Onshore wind turbines
  • Offshore wind turbines
  • Wind farm development & operation
  • Turbine servicing/O&M

Customers

  • Utility/wind-farm developers (domestic and oversea

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Renewable energy equipment
  • Wind power
  • Wind turbines, wind farm…

What could go right

  • Global wind capacity build-out
  • China offshore wind growth

What could go wrong

  • Turbine price competition/margin pressure
  • Policy/subsidy dependent demand

Moat: narrow (scale, IP / patents, installed base). Large domestic turbine manufacturing scale and installed base, but competes on price against Vestas, GE Vernova and other Chinese makers.

Headquarters: Urumqi, China · Founded: 1998 · Employees: 11,890

Named competitors

Goldwind Science & Technology at a glance

Size Goldwind Science & Technology (002202.SZ) is a China Industrials company (Electrical Products) with a market value of $8.58B, the 288th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥15.13 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 45.1%, against -16.5% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 5th lowest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 11.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +14.9%); the operating margin is 6.3% (peer median 13.8%).

Valuation It trades at 16.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.1× (10th most expensive of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.7 points below its cost of capital (6.6% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 1 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 83002202.SZ 54
Six months, rebased to 100: Goldwind Science & Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Goldwind Science & Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥76.9BCN¥72.9BCN¥56.5BCN¥50.4BCN¥46.3B
Revenue growth—+29%+12%+9%—
Gross profitCN¥14.6BCN¥9.73BCN¥7.23BCN¥8.19BCN¥7.84B
EBITDAn/aCN¥7.98BCN¥5.01BCN¥4.17BCN¥4.49B
Net incomeCN¥3.07BCN¥2.66BCN¥1.86BCN¥1.22BCN¥2.20B
Free cash flow-CN¥5.23B-CN¥3.33B-CN¥5.18B-CN¥4.33B-CN¥2.89B
Capital expenditureCN¥9.73BCN¥7.48BCN¥7.67BCN¥6.78BCN¥9.03B
Total debtCN¥66.5BCN¥56.3BCN¥54.4BCN¥55.0BCN¥54.8B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Goldwind Science & Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-50%-25%0%6887776011795801665636656018773898600885SMINAYI6504267260HAVELLS0028505333002636600482603195002202.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Goldwind Science & Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+200%+400%+600%0×50×100×688777601179066858016656601877600885SMINHAVELLS002202.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Goldwind Science & Technology is the large dot.

Goldwind Science & Technology competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (002202.SZ vs VWS.CO vs GEV vs 601615.SS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Goldwind Science & Technology 002202.SZ$8.58B-45%+11%6%16.6×n/a
Vestas Wind Systems A/S VWS.CO$31.0B+8%+10%7%21.3×0.5%
GE Vernova GEV$205B-26%+17%7%32.2×24.9%
Ming Yang Smart Energy 601615.SS$2.80B-47%+8%-4%19.4×n/a

How Goldwind Science & Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Goldwind Science & Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure002202.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-9.3%-6.2%10th lowest of 21
6-month return-45.1%-16.5%5th lowest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-59.1%-40.6%5th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+11.4%+14.9%9th lowest of 21
Operating margin6.3%13.8%3rd lowest of 21
Forward P/E16.6×15.1×10th most expensive of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital-0.7 pp+6.7 pp4th lowest of 21
Net debt / EBITDA5.9×-0.1×most indebted of 10

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Goldwind Science & Technology 002202.SZChina$8.58B-45%+11%6%16.6×n/an/a
SUPCON Technology 688777.SSChina$8.58B-9%-6%-3%116.4×n/an/a
China XD Electric 601179.SSChina$8.51B-35%+7%8%36.0×n/an/a
Anker Innovations Technology 0668.HKHong Kong$8.68Bn/a+28%11%14.8×22.2%+25.8%
Furukawa Electric 5801.TJapan$8.75B-54%+13%6%11.9×n/an/a
Sigenergy Technology 6656.HKHong Kong$8.31B-51%+577%36%11.0×n/an/a
Bizlink 3665.TWTaiwan$8.00B-54%+33%17%14.2×5.3%+25.9%
Zhejiang Chint Electrics 601877.SSChina$7.97B-24%+4%14%10.1×-8.3%+12.1%
Zhuzhou CRRC Times Electric 3898.HKHong Kong$7.95B-24%+17%14%7.5×n/an/a
Hongfa Technology 600885.SSChina$7.81B+8%+34%14%22.9×9.0%+17.2%
Smiths SMIN.LUnited Kingdom$9.45B+5%-34%16%22.6×15.2%-4.2%
Acuity AYIUnited States$9.59B+10%+7%16%15.1×6.6%+6.0%
Fuji Electric 6504.TJapan$9.68B-18%+9%12%13.1×11.3%+7.0%
Hd Hyundai Electric 267260.KSSouth Korea$9.71B-71%+21%25%15.0×0.7%+17.6%
Havells India HAVELLS.NSIndia$7.47B-11%+16%7%44.0×39.8%+16.6%
Shenzhen Kedali Industry 002850.SZChina$7.46B-9%+40%12%22.2×n/an/a
Ngk 5333.TJapan$7.43B-13%+10%16%13.1×4.4%+8.2%
Goldenmax International 002636.SZChina$7.20B+47%+79%30%n/a24.4%+4.4%
China Shipbuilding Industry Group Power 600482.SSChina$10.3B-21%+13%7%23.4×-19.6%+16.5%
Innio INIOUnited States$10.3Bn/a+22%13%17.5×6.5%+22.1%
Goneo Group Co., Ltd.Class A 603195.SSChina$10.4B-15%-2%25%17.4×-2.1%+9.8%

Questions

Who are Goldwind Science & Technology's main competitors?
Named competitors: Vestas Wind Systems (VWS.CO), GE Vernova (GEV), Mingyang Smart Energy (601615.SS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes SUPCON Technology (688777.SS), China XD Electric (601179.SS), Anker Innovations Technology (0668.HK), Furukawa Electric (5801.T), Sigenergy Technology (6656.HK), Bizlink (3665.TW).
Is Goldwind Science & Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 16.6× against a peer median of 15.1×, 10th most expensive of 20 in its peer set.
How has Goldwind Science & Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -45.1% against -16.5% for the median peer; over one year -0.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.